Case law

Baker v. STEELE

229 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1961

The board had jurisdiction to make the determination, and Baker failed to demonstrate wherein the pro *501 ceedings were irregular. Bechtold et al. v. Wilson et al., 182 Or 360 , 186 P2d 525 , 187 P2d 675 . … Bechtold et al. v. Wilson et al., supra. The city charter admittedly gives the civil service board jurisdiction to decide disputes concerning seniority.

McCleery v. Woodmen of the World

136 Or. 407 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1930

Board, 123 Cal. 24 ( 55 P. 576 ). The doctrine appeals to us as reasonable and sound.” See also Freitas v. Freitas, 31 Cal. App. 16 ( 159 P. 611 ); Jory v. Supreme Council, 105 Cal. 20 ( 38 P. 524 , 26 L. R. … Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.

309 Or. 292 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1990

In this workers’ compensation case, the Court of Appeals concluded that the referee’s findings of fact, which were affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Board, are not supported by substantial evidence. Garcia v. … See Stovall v. Sally Salmon Seafood, 306 Or 25, 31 , 757 P2d 410 (1988); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or 238 , 675 P2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, 293 Or 239 , 646 P2d 1330 (1982).

Multnomah County Sheriff's Office v. Edwards

Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 10, 2017

Audio Recording, Senate Education and General Government Committee, SB 822, Apr 10, 2007 at 47:52 (statement of Paula Brown). … The employer sought judicial review of the board’s decision and asserted, for the first time, that the board lacked jurisdiction to hear med- ical services claims.

Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers

247 Or. 158 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1966

It is for the Board, not the courts, to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged. National Labor Relations *165 Board v. … Wisconsin Board, 351 US 266 , 76 S Ct 794 , 100 L ed 1162 (1956); United Workers v. Laburnum Corp., 347 US 656 , 74 S Ct 833 , 98 L ed 1025 (1954). ③ International Asso. of Machinists v.

In Re Hayes' Estate

161 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1938

R. 498. *16 In Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622 , 29 L. Ed. 257 , 5 S. … The period of his ownership was brief, possibly no longer than five days, but in Brown v. Houston, supra, American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, supra, General Oil Co. v. Crain, supra, Bacon v.

Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

256 Or. 124 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1970

This, we understand, is the import of Sailors v. Board of Education, 387 US 105 , 87 S Ct 1549 , 18 L Ed2d 650 (1967). … Plaintiffs point specifically to the elaboration of the principle in Sailors v. Board of Education, 387 US 105 , 87 S Ct 1549 , 18 L Ed 2d 650 (1967); Kramer v.

Albright v. Browne

55 Or. 599 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1910

Surles v. Sweeney, 11 Or. 21 *602 ( 4 Pac. 469 ) ; Hexter v. Schneider, 14 Or. 184 ( 12 Pac. 668 ) ; Moorhouse v. Donaca, 14 Or. 430 ( 13 Pac. 112 ). … Browne originally secured possession of the property by permission of the Calumet & Oregon Mining Company, the then owner, and hence his right to the goods was not initiated by any tortuous act or maintained by fraud.

State Ex Rel. Swan v. Kozer

115 Or. 638 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1925

BROWN, J. The Secretary of State can be required to act only in compliance with an existing law. … Board, 34 Kan. 606 ( 9 Pac. 765 ); State ex rel. v. Sims, 18 S. C. 460).” That excerpt is quoted in Andrews v. Neil, 61 Or. 471 ( 120 Pac. 383 , 123 Pac. 32 ).

Libby Creek Logging, Inc. v. Johnson

225 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1960

all logs removed up to and including one *339 million board feet. … Heise v. Pilot Rock Lbr. Co., supra; Selman v. Shirley, 161 Or 582, 591-592 , 85 P2d 384 , 91 P2d 312 ; Shafer et ux. v. Ekstrand et ux., 140 Or 582, 589 , 14 P2d 287 ; Hunt v. Ring et al., supra; Lichtenthaler v.

White v. Mears

44 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1904

In David v. … In the case at bar, however, the commissioners for licensing sailors’ boarding houses are evidently not the agents of any municipality. In People v.

Gadalean v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Gadalean)

364 Or. 707 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2019

Gadalean v. SAIF , 286 Or. App. 227 , 398 P.3d 503 (2017). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the Court of Appeals erred, and we affirm the board's denial of coverage. … ORS 656.012 ; see Smothers v.

Strong v. Moore

105 Or. 12 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1922

Robinson by the payment of $1,000 acquired from the Browns an option whereby she could purchase the real property owned by the Browns by paying within a prescribed time the additional sum of $10,000 and giving a note for … The insurers paid $34,000, the full amount of the insurance, the Browns receiving the amount of their mortgage and the Moores receiving the balance of the insurance money.

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Adams

293 Or. 727 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1982

This class action was referred to in the proceedings before the Trial Board as Whitt v. Boe. … Adams v. Transamerica Insurance, 45 Or App 769 , 609 P2d 834 (1980).

Corporation of the Sisters of Mercy v. Lane County

123 Or. 144 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1927

BROWN, J. Section 4235, Or. … Francis v. Board of Review, 231 Ill. 317 ( 83 N. E. 272 ), St. Joseph’s Hospital Assn. v. Ashland County, 96 Wis. 636 ( 72 N. W. 43 ), and State v. Powers, 10 Mo. App. 263 ( 74 Mo. 476 ).

State v. Coats

158 Or. 122 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1937

McDonald, 132 Or. 622 ( 287 P. 220 ); National Thrift Ass’n v. Crews, supra; National Sales Co. v. Manciet, 83 Or. 34 ( 162 P. 1065 , L. R. A. 1917D, 485); Quatsoe v. Eggleston, supra; Fleming v. … Bartee, 187 La. 529 ( 175 So. 50 ); State v. Lowe, 178 N. C. 770 ( 101 S. E. 385 ); Commonwealth v. Plissner (Mass.), 4 N. E. (2d) 241; Johnson v. State, 137 Ala. 101 (34 So. *134 1018); Loiseau v.

Price v. SAIF Corp.

296 Or. 311 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1984

Winters v. Grimes, 124 Or 214, 216-17 , 264 P 359 (1928). … The supreme court’s opinion in Cavins v.

Volp v. Saylor

42 Or. 546 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1903

court of record entered without jurisdiction of the person or authority of law, when it SO' appears upon its-faee, may be vacated at any time by virtue of the power inherent in the court, and even upon its own motion: Ladd v. … Mason, 10 Or. 308 ; White v. Ladd, 41 Or. 324 ( 68 Pac. 739 ).

Southwest Forest Industries v. Anders

299 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1985

” citing Stevens v. … SERVICE ON THE BOARD The Court of Appeals, sua sponte, dismissed this appeal for failure to serve the Board as required by ORS 656.298(3). The same reasoning employed by this court from *219 the time of Demitro v.

White v. Holman

44 Or. 180 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1904

In Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City, 111 U. S. 746 (4 Sup. … Thus in Plumb v. Christie, 103 Ga. 686 ( 30 S. E. 759 , 42 L. R.