Case law

State v. Jackson

296 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1984

What I have to say hereafter about the plurality opinion in Texas v. Brown, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983), is unnecessary to a decision in the case at bar. … State v. Louis, supra . [5] I take the facts from Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.

Barrett v. Belleque

344 Or. 91 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 2008

The court relied upon Penrod/Brown v. … Penrod /Brown, 283 Or at 28 .

Atwell v. Schmitt

111 Or. 96 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1924

In the transaction involved here there was not such an exercise of judgment by the directors as to the value of the options as the statute intended should be exercised by a board of directors in the purchase of property or … J., and Burnett and Brown, JJ., concur.

Warren v. MARION COUNTY

222 Or. 307 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1960

State v. Lermeny, 213 Or 574 , 326 P2d 768 (1958); Kempien v. Board of Com’rs. of Ramsey County, 160 Minn 69, 199 NW 442 (1924); 2 Sutherland, Statutory Construction (3rd ed), §4925. … In the creation of an administrative board it is not necessary to prescribe the specific procedure under which it must operate. Peninsula Corporation v. United States, supra; Whittle v.

Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human Resources

297 Or. 562 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1984

See Harris v. … such a claim, see Sterling v.

Watts v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.

88 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1918

Returning in the evening they boarded the train at Rainier and when it arrived near Goble, the brakeman Burgess called that station and just before the train came to a stop the three men raised up from their seats in the … The language and conduct of counsel will justify a reversal only when connected with some judicial error on the part of the trial judge: Nelson v. Brown & McCabe, 81 Or. 472 ( 159 Pac. 1163 ); State v.

Zurich Insurance v. Diversified Risk Management

300 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1985

In Southwest Forest Industries v. … In Stroh v.

SAIF Corp. v. Drews

318 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1993

SAIF argued that the Board misinterpreted the 1990 amendments. The Court of Appeals agreed with the Board’s analysis and affirmed its order. SAIF v. Drews, supra. … Bracke v. Baza’r, 293 Or 239, 244 , 646 P2d 1330 (1982). See Runft v. SAIF, 303 Or 493, 499-500 , 739 P2d 12 (1987) (recognizing that “last injurious exposure” rule may produce arbitrary results); Boise Cascade Corp. v.

Roy v. Palmateer

339 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2005

Roy v. Palmateer, 194 Or App 330 , 95 P3d 1124 (2004). We allowed the state’s petition for review and, as noted, now reverse. 1 The facts that give rise to the present case are undisputed. … He argued that, under this court’s decision in Norris v.

State ex rel. Virginia Glass Products Corp. v. Glens Falls Insurance

254 Or. 340 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1969

Dist. v. Gen. Ins. Co., 240 Or 103 , 399 P2d 351 , we pointed out that the affirmative action of a public body as required by ORS 279.526 is the resolution of the Board. … Dist. v. Gen. Ins. Co., supra. We, therefore, hold that a public body may not retroactively start the time running. To hold otherwise would be to open the door for a public body to circumvent the statute.

Portland University v. Multnomah County

31 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1897

Wasco County, 2 Or. 206; Rhea v. Umatilla County, 2 Or. 298. … Y. 342 ; Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Hodges, 113 *503 Ill. 323 ; Black on Tax Titles, §§ 142, 147.

Saif Corp. v. Allen

320 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1994

Ohlig v. … Because the Board’s action is within the legislative policy behind ORS 656.262(6), the Board did not err. 22 Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., supra, 290 Or at 227 .

Vendrell v. School District No. 26C

226 Or. 263 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1961

See, James & Yost v. Board of Higher Edu., 216 Or 598, 601 , 340 P2d 577 (1959). … Taylor v. Knox Co. Board of Education, 292 Ky 767, 167 SW2d 700 , 145 ALR 1333 (1942) is illustrative. In that ease the defendant board of education purchased liability insurance authorized by statute.

Garbutt v. SAIF Corp.

297 Or. 148 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1984

In Oakley v. … The cases cited in Oakley, Larson v. Compensation Dept., 251 Or 478 , 445 P2d 486 (1968), and Collins v.

Saylor v. Enterprise Electric Co.

110 Or. 231 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1924

BROWN, J. … Why use a board? “A.

Heller v. Ebb Auto Co.

308 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1989

See, e.g., Dennis v. Employment Div., 302 Or 160 , 728 P2d 12 (1986); Hyde v. Employment Division, 302 Or 171 , 728 P2d 19 (1986). … Similarly, although the Board may decide the merits of a compensation claim anew on the referee’s record, see OAR 472- 10-020(l)(b) and (c); Dennis v.

Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, Inc.

264 Or. 614 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1973

Plaintiffs’ contentions—Browning v. C & C Plywood Gorp. … Plaintiffs also say that in Browning v.

Morrow County v. Hendryx

14 Or. 397 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1887

The same doctrine is maintained in Canova et al. v. Comm’rs of Bradford Co., *402 18 Fla. 512 ; Trinity Co. v. Polk Co., 58 Tex. 321 ; Pulaski County v. Judge of Saline Co., 37 Ark. 339 ; Supervisors of Chickasaw Co. v. … Supervisors of Sumner Co., 58 Miss. 619 ; Eagle v. Beard,, 33 Ark. 497 ; State v. McFadden, 23 Minn. 40 ; Askew v. Hale Co., 54 Ala. 639 ; Comm'rs of Currituck Co. v. Comm’rs of Dare Co., 79 N.

Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19

300 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1986

“In Megdal v. … Problems of interest representation on public agencies are discussed in Megdal, v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 307 , 605 P2d 273 (1980), and in City of Roseburg v.

SAIF Corp. v. Dubose

335 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2003

In Mabon v. … In Norton v.