Case law

Brown v. Austin

102 Or. 53 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1921

“Note: After the death of the father of the said Charles Brown, to wit, Paul Brown, and the marriage of mother of Charles Brown, to the said George Gardner, there was loaned to the said George Gardner, by the said Charles … Brown’s mother (then Mrs.

Brown v. Hill

341 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2006

140 P.3d 580 (2006) 341 Or. 197 BROWN v. HILL. No. S53572. OREGON SUPREME COURT. July 18, 2006. Petition for review denied.

State v. Brown

344 Or. 670 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2008

189 P.3d 25 (2008) 344 Or. 670 STATE v. BROWN. No. (S055765). Supreme Court of Oregon. June 20, 2008. Petition for review allowed. Upon consideration by the court. Respondent's petition for review is allowed. … The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Ramirez, 343 Or. 505 , 173 P.3d 817 (2007).

Andrews v. Brown

56 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1910

The objection taken by plaintiff to the trial of either of these *256 issues was well taken: Love v. Morrell, 19 Or. 545 ( 24 Pac. 916 ); Dice v. McCauly, 22 Or. 456 ( 30 Pac. 160 .) 2. … This case is so similar to Love v. Morrill, 19 Or. 545 ( 24 Pac. 916 ), that we deem an extended opinion unnecessary. The decree of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Sprague v. Brown

283 Or. 5 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1978

in no way admitting that Esther Sprague is entitled to anything, but on the other hand, I am only admitting to this escrow in order that the settlement proceeds can be disbursed as outlined in the accounting letter from Brown … Sandblast v. Williams, 254 Or 395 , 460 P2d 1014 (1969), is very close in point on the latter issue. Charles and Frances Williams were purchasing real property on contract.

Brown v. Vogt

272 Or. 482 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1975

Coates v. … See also Foley v. Pittenger, 264 Or 310 , 503 P2d 476 (1972), reinstating a verdict awarding damages for criminal conversation. The allowance of punitive damages in Coates v.

Brown v. Hill

337 Or. 247 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 2004

95 P.3d 728 (2004) 337 Or. 247 BROWN v. HILL S51497. Supreme Court of Oregon. July 20, 2004. Petition for review denied.

Brown v. Portland

73 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1914

The case is governed by the principles announced in Hochfeld v. Portland, 72 Or. 190 ( 142 Pac. 824 ), and Cook v.

Jackson v. Brown

116 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1925

said Brown. … This does not vitiate his lien: 2 Jones on Liens (3 ed.), 642, § 1413, 644, § 1415; Bartels v. McCullough et al., 102 Or. 66 ( 201 Pac. 733 ). Malone v.

Brown v. Moore

3 Or. 435 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1869

Studer v. Brown

244 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1966

Brown, Thatcher’s mother, signed the order for the boys and agreed to hold the supplier harmless for any damage or injury arising out of the use of the chemicals. Mrs. … Brown knew the chemicals were explosive, and that the boys intended to create explosions with them.

Brown v. Bryant

250 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1968

Fletcher v. Walters, 246 Or. 362 , 425 P2d 539 ; Gray v. Galantha, 235 Or 521 , 385 P2d 746 ; Burghardt v. Olson, 223 Or 155 , 349 P2d 792 , 354 P2d 871 ; Williamson v. McKenna, 223 Or 366 , 354 P2d 56 .

Brown v. Whittington

39 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1901

This was no more than Shull could have compelled Brown to do. Mr. … Conv. (3 ed.), § 301; Marks v. Crow, 14 Or. 382 ( 13 Pac. 55 ); Bank of Colfax v. Richardson, 34 Or. 518 ( 75 Am. St. Rep. 664 , 54 Pac. 359 ); Horton v. Dewey, 53 Wis. 410 , 10 N.

Hill v. Brown

282 Or. 499 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1978

See, e.g., Quillin v. Peloquin, 237 Or 343, 346-347 , 391 P2d 603 (1964); Salem King’s Products Co. v. Ramp, 100 or 329, 355, 196 P 401 (1921). See also Russell v. … Brown testified to their recollections of the negotiations in 1964.

Brown v. Haverfield

276 Or. 911 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1976

Brown” ORS 696.030(1) is set out in footnote 2 supra. The legislative history of ORS 696.030(1) supports this interpretation of the statute. … John Black, President of the Salem Board of Realtors, testified that "The problem is that the law permits an owner or his 'regular employees’ to sell his property.

Brown v. Transcon Lines

284 Or. 597 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1978

The plaintiff in that case had made a request to the Public Employe Relations Board (PERB) that it reclassify her as a Revenue Agent 2, contending that she was doing the duties of that position and that she had been denied … Matthews, 201 Minn 113, 275 NW 698, 700 (1937); Urbach v. Urbach, 52 Wyo 207, 73 P2d 953, 961 (1937); State v. Barney, 133 Neb 676, 276 NW 676, 683 (1937); Rennie v.

Brown v. Haun

328 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1999

Brown v. Corson

16 Or. 388 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1888

plaintiffs, “and their legal representatives forever, that said real estate is free from all *389 encumbrances, and that we will, and our heirs, executors, and administrators shall warrant and defend the same to the said Hiram Brown … In Corson’s contest with the railroad company, he decided it was publio land where the railroad company attached, and in the contest of the Railroad Company v.

De Young v. Brown

368 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 2021

Brown BALMER, J. This case concerns attorney fees awarded by the Court of Appeals following its decision in De Young v. Brown, 297 Or App 355, 443 P3d 642 (2019) (De Young I). … De Young v. Brown, 300 Or App 530, 532, 451 P3d 651 (2019) (De Young II). The Court of Appeals explained that “[t]he inherent equitable power to award attorney fees was first recognized in Oregon in Gilbert [v.

Brown v. EBI Companies

289 Or. 455 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

We hold only that a finding of "good cause” was not foreclosed by our decision in Sekermestrovich v. SAIF, as the Board appears to have thought. … It is therefore necessary to return this case to the Board. Reversed and remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board.