Case law

Partlow v. Clark

295 Or. 778 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1983

Temple v. Osburn, supra, was a suit to remove a cloud on 163 acres in Lane County. On January 19,1905, the patent from the United States Government to Texana Brown conveying that land was recorded in the deed records. … Texana Brown was the former wife of S. W. Brown, one of the defendants. On October 7,1905, Texana Brown for a valuable consideration conveyed the land to Minnie B. Temple, the plaintiff.

State v. Fogle

254 Or. 268 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1969

Jones v. *275 City of Forrest City, 239 Ark 211 , 388 SW2d 386 (1965); State v. Fox, 177 Neb 238, 128 NW2d 576 (1964); and State v. … In Kyhl v.

Gantenbein v. Bowles

103 Or. 277 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1922

Thomason, 30 Or. 162 ( 45 Pac. 296 ); Goldsmith v. Elwert, 31 Or. 539 (50 Pac. 867); Board of Regents v. Hutchinson, 46 Or. 57 ( 78 Pac. 1028 ); McCoy v. Crossfield, 54 Or. 591 ( 104 Pac. 423 ); Miller v. … McBride, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. State Dental Ass'n v. Smith

201 Or. 288 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 1954

Co. v. Bean, 167 Or 535, 546 , 119 P2d 575 ; ORS 42.230. *291 In Swift & Co. and Armour & Co. v. Peterson, 192 Or 97, 108 , 233 P2d 216 , Mr. … Leonard v. Ekwall, 124 Or. 351, 359 , 264 P. 463 ; Fox v. Galloway, 174 Or. 339, 346 , 148 P2d 922 .”

Roberts v. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.

358 Or. 413 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 10, 2015

CTS Corp. v. … Ross v.

Moulton v. Logan

157 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1937

Ed. 402 ); Miles v. Logan, (Tex. Civ. App.) 265 S. W. 421 ; Flemming v. Stahl, 83 Fed. 940 ; Sharpe v. Los Angeles, 136 Cal. App. 732 ( 29 P. (2d) 797 ); Morgan v. Nunn, 84 Fed. 551 ; 14 R. C. L. 374, § 76; 46 C. … There are possibly exceptional cases, as observed by Circuit Judge (afterwards supreme court justice) Lurton in Morgan v.

State Ex Rel. Cady v. Allen

254 Or. 467 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1969

In Ryf v. … This was the import of our holding in Romero v.

Dunn v. University of Oregon

9 Or. 357 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1881

(Angell and Ames on Corporations, section 76; Thomas v. … Osborn v. The Bank of the United States, 9 Wheat., 738 ; Michigan State Bank v. Hastings, 1 Douglas, [Mich. R.,] 225; Garr v. Bright, 1 Paige Ch., 157 .)

Norpac Foods, Inc. v. Gilmore

318 Or. 363 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1994

On review, the Board reversed the referee’s decision, relying on Boyd v. … In reaching that conclusion, the Board and the Court of Appeals have relied on this court’s decision in Cope v. West American Ins. Co., supra. Both the Board and the Court of Appeals have misread the decision in Cope .

City of Portland v. GARNER

226 Or. 80 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1960

Winslow v. … Bechtold v. Wilson, 182 Or 360, 377 , 186 P2d 525 , 187 P2d 675 ; Safeway Stores v. State Board of Agriculture, 198 Or 43, 53 , 255 P2d 564 .

La Forge v. Ellis

175 Or. 545 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1944

Cr. 104 , 93 P. (2d) 21 ; Arnold v. Board of Barber Examiners, 45 N. M. 57, 109 P. (2d) 779 ; State v. McMasters, 204 Minn. 438 , 283 N. W. 767 . To the contrary are: City of Mobile v. … R. 349; Noble v. Davis, 204 Ark. 156 , 161 S. W. (2d) 189 ; In re Kazas, 22 Cal. App. (2d) 161, 70 P. (2d) 962 ; Duncan v. City of Des Moines, 222 Iowa 218 , 268 N. W. 547 ; State Board of Barber Examiners v.

Wemett v. Mount

134 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1930

Brown, 52 Or. 33 ( 95 P. 1114 ). … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Robinson v. Holmes

57 Or. 5 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1910

Pl. & Pr. 534; Edwards, Bills & Notes (3 ed.) § 948; 8 Cyc. 126; Lightstone v. Laurencel, 4 Cal. 277 ; Dowling v. Hunt, 2 Ariz. 8 ( 7 Pac. 496 ) ; Malott v. Jewett, 1 Kan. App. 14 ( 41 Pac. 674 ) ; Galbraith v. … The judgment is therefore reversed as to the defendants, Brown and Fannie Barton, and the cause is remanded, with directions to sustain their demurrers. Reversed.

McCabe-Duprey Tanning Co. v. Eubanks

57 Or. 44 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1910

Brown, contra. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Moore. 1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the transcript was not filed within the prescribed time. … Brown. For respondent there was a brief over the name of Mr. Marcus W. Robbins. The motion will therefore be denied. Denied.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Geurts

290 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1980

It is enough if the Board of Governors takes responsibility for the composition of a trial board in *245 fact and not only in law, that is to say, if the proposed membership is reported to the Board of Governors and the board … U S Const, amend V: "No person shall ... be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, . . .” 8 Cf. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).

SAIF Corp. v. Kurcin

334 Or. 399 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 2002

SAIF v. Kurcin, 160 Or App 489, 494 , 981 P2d 1277 (1999). We allowed claimant’s petition for review. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and affirm the Board’s order. … The Court of Appeals concluded that “[w]hether to grant a continuance is a matter committed to the discretion of the Board.” SAIF v. Kurcin, 160 Or App at 492 .

Miller v. Grants Pass Irrigation District

297 Or. 312 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1984

Stevenson v. State of Oregon, supra, 290 Or at 9-10 . … See Bradford v. Davis, 290 Or 855, 864-65 , 626 P2d 1376 (1981).

Livesley v. Johnston

45 Or. 30 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1904

Its terms unmistakably import a sale of the hops to the amount of 20,000 pounds, to be grown by Johnston in each of the five years designated, and an agreement upon his part *42 to deliver them at Woodburn, on board the cars … Co. v. Town of Chico, (C. C.) 24 Fed. 893 ; Zaleski v. Clark, 44 Conn. 218 ( 26 Am. Rep. 446 ); McCarren v. McNulty, 7 Gray, 139 ; Brown v. Foster, 113 Mass. 136 ( 18 Am. Rep. 463 ); Gibson v.

State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. Cook

340 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 13, 2006

The Court of Appeals ultimately dismissed the petition, 3 Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 197 Or App 43 , 103 P3d 1201 (2005) (Engweiler IV). In Engweiler v. … Harris v. Board of Parole, 288 Or 495, 503 , 605 P2d 1181 (1980).

Ebbtide Enterprises v. Tucker

303 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1987

The issue is whether the rule of Bauman v. … The responsibility question was nevertheless subject to the Board’s de novo review. See Destael v. Nicolai Co., 80 Or App 596 , [ 723 P2d 348 ] (1986).