Case law

Gump v. Halberstadt

15 Or. 356 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1887

In Curtis v. Brown, 5 Cush. 488 , Shaw, C. … Brown, 118 Mass. 138 ; Furbish v. Goodnough, 98 Mass. 296 .) In Fullam, v. Adams, 37 Vt. 401 , Poland, C.

Washington County Police Officers Ass'n v. Washington County

321 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1995

The order of the Employment Relations Board is affirmed. … ERB held: “In short, [the] manual provisions that the Association challenges are consistent with the directives that this Board has issued in [Washington County Police Officers Association v.

Fieger v. Imperial Skating Rink

148 Or. 137 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1934

Rogers v. Meyerson Printing Co., 103 Mo. App. 683 ( 78 S. … Where two or more tort-feasors inflict injury or damage, both or either of them may be charged: *149 Brown v. Jones et al., 130 Or. 424 ( 278 P. 981 ); Stamos v.

Crowe v. Albee

87 Or. 148 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1918

In Imperial Water Co. v. … Wulzen v.

Shoulders v. SAIF Corp.

300 Or. 606 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1986

SAIF cites Forney v. … In Korter v.

Sheldon v. U.S. Bank (In re Comp. of Sheldon)

364 Or. 831 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 2019

The Court of Appeals held that the board applied the wrong standard, vacated the board's decision, and remanded the case to the board to apply the standard in the manner directed by that court. Sheldon v. … See, e.g. , Hamilton v. SAIF , 256 Or.

MacEwan v. HOLM

226 Or. 27 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1961

Disabled Police Veterans Club v. Long, supra. Similarly, the transcribed minutes of a local school board meeting prior to approval by the board were held to be a “public writing” in Conover v. … Board of Education of Nebo School Dist., supra. And in International Union v.

No Special Rights Committee v. Keisling

312 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1991

ORS 250.085(2). 2 Brown v. Roberts, 309 Or 667, 669 , 791 P2d 488 (1990). We, therefore, dismiss the petition as to the committee. We also dismiss the petition as to Mabon. … Brown v. Roberts, supra, 309 Or at 669 . *462 Petition to review ballot title dismissed.

First National Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

127 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1928

The bonds were afterward returned to Brown and given to Mrs. Brown. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Ring v. Patterson

137 Or. 234 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1931

Olcott, supra; State ex rel. v. Board of Health of Hudson County, 53 N. J. Law, 594 ( 22 Atl. 226 ); Ewbank v. Turner, 134 N. C. 77 ( 46 S. E. 508 ); Williams v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 93 Tenn. 619 ( 27 S. … W. 1019 ); State v. Gregory, 83 Mo. 123 , 53 Am. Rep. 565 ; Van Vleck v. Board of Dental Examiners, 5 Cal. Unrep. Cas. 636 ( 44 P. 223 , 44 L. R. A. 635); Raaf v.

State v. Walters

105 Or. 662 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1922

Finding this place “locked up,” Palmer suggested that he and Thorpe board a street-car “and go around on the street-ear.” Thorpe and Palmer entered a street-car, and the patrol-wagon “went back.” … Brown, J., not sitting.

Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc.

297 Or. 10 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1984

In Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597 , 588 P2d 1087 (1978), the plaintiff filed a workers’ compensation claim and was discharged for so doing. … In Brown , plaintiff was entitled to a wrongful discharge remedy and in Campbell , plaintiff was not. What is the difference? The statutory right pursued in Brown related directly to the plaintiffs role as an employee.

Johnson v. Underwood

102 Or. 680 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1922

BROWN, J. 1. Appellant’s assignments numbered 1, 2 and 3, involving a motion for nonsuit, for a directed verdict, and a requested instruction, cover the same ground, thus presenting but one question. … On redirect examination of Irvin, he was asked: “ * * I will ask you to look at this picture, for instance; here is the running-board, which appears to be stove in, in a way; would that necessarily indicate that that running-board

Re Determination of Water Rights of Hood River.

114 Or. 112 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1923

At the hearing before the Water Board Mr. … Burnett, Brown and McCourt, JJ., dissent in special opinions.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Maddox

295 Or. 448 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1983

“February 19,1980: Court of Appeals affirms (without opinion) the Board’s order in compensability case. Maddox v. SAIF, 44 Or App 520 , 605 P2d 1391 (1980). … “March 9,1981: Court of Appeals remands compensability case to Board. Maddox v. SAIF, 51 Or App 2 , 624 P2d 643 (1981). *451 “December 7,1981: Board on remand holds claim not compensable.

SAIF Corp. v. Sprague

346 Or. 661 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2009

Sprague v. … SAIF v. Sprague, 221 Or App 413 , 190 P3d 443 (2008) (Sprague III). The majority concluded that the board had complied with the remand instructions and affirmed the board’s decision.

Johnston v. Leach

197 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1953

We accept, and will apply the general views as to the nature of gross negligence expressed in Bauch v. Stecklein; Boss v. Hayes; Callander and Stone v. Brown; and Baird v. Boyer, all supra. … Herzog v. Mittleman, supra.

Westfall v. Westfall

100 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1921

BROWN, J. We have set down the facts at some length in the statement for the reason that this case is out of the ordinary. The contradictory statements of plaintiff and defendant raise questions of veracity. … Eq. 412 ( 2 Atl. 376 ); States v. States, 37 N. J. Eq. 195; Foss v. Foss, 12 Allen, 26 ; Crehore v. Crehore, 97 Mass. 330 ( 93 Am. Dec. 98 ); Carris v. Carris, 24 N. J. Eq. 516.”

Splonskofsky v. Minto

62 Or. 560 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1912

In Hamilton v. … People, 75 Ill. 561 ; Munson v. Miner, 22 Ill. 594 ; Samuels v. Drainage Com’n, 125 Ill. 536 ( 17 N. E. 829 ) ; People v. Knopf, 183 Ill. 410 ( 56 N. E. 155 ) ; Rosell v. Board of Education, 68 N. J.

State v. Miglavs

Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 2004

State v. Miglavs , 186 Or App 420 , 63 P3d 1202 (2003). We allowed defendant's petition for review. … See State v.