Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

2.31s

  • Moore v. Schermerhorn

    210 Or. 23 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1957

    Brown v. Miles, 193 Or 466 , 238 P2d 761 , is not controlling. … In the case of State Land Board v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Matter of Marriage of Fromdahl

    314 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1992

    State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 407 ; State v. Lyon, supra, 304 Or at 224 . … We need not decide in this case whether the concerns identified by this court in State v. Brown, supra, and State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Bailey

    Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2014

    set out in Brown was not affected by Hudson. … Brown, 422 US at 605.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • School District No. 7 v. Weissenfluh

    236 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1963

    Smith, 75 Or Adv Sh 653, 377 P2d 8 (1962); Vestal v. Pickering, 125 Or 553 , 267 P 821 (1928); Hammond Lumber Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 85 Cal App2d 568, 193 P2d 503 (1948); State ex rel Resenstahl v. … County School Board v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hartford Ins. v. Central R. R.

    74 Or. 144 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1914

    Co., 53 Or. 66 ( 99 Pac. 76 ); Palmer v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co., 56 Or. 262 ( 108 Pac. 211 ); Gynther v. Brown & McCabe, 67 Or. 318 ( 134 Pac. 1186 ). … The neglect to show that one half of the capital stock had been taken, or a board of directors elected, was a failure to prove that plaintiff had ever been organized as a de jure corporation; and, as it could transact no

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • J. W. Copeland Yards v. Phillips

    275 Or. 193 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1976

    The law applicable to such a situation is stated to be as follows in Brown v. Farrell; Farrell v. … Justice McBride in Bartels v. McCullough, 102 Or 66 , 201 P 733 (1921): " 'In Mason v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.

    222 Or. 78 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1960

    This the defendant asserts may not be done, citing as authority therefor Baines v. Coos Bay Nav. Co., 41 Or 135, 138 , 68 P 397 ; Brown v. Feldwert, 46 Or 363, 365, 367 , 80 P 414 ; Interior Warehouse Co. v. … The stated purpose was to show that “this transaction has been handled as any other transaction is handled, open and above board.”

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • State v. Wiltse

    373 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 7, 2024

    Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 381-82, 823 P2d 956 (1991) (citing State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56, 800 P2d 259 (1990)). … State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221, 233, 744 P2d 231 (1987) (citing State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 440-41, 687 P2d 751 (1984)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. State Tax Commission

    229 Or. 609 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1962

    Also see Annotation, 81 ALR 1271 ; Brown, Personal Property 180, § 61 (1936); Restatement, 1 Contracts 151-158, §§ 133-135. We hold that the wife’s interest in the contract was that of a donee beneficiary. … Rhodes v. Rhodes, 266 SW2d 790 , 44 ALR2d 1266 (Ky. 1953); Ireland v. Lester, 298 Mich 154 , 298 NW 488 (1941); Silverthorne v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • School District No. 68 v. Hoskins

    194 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1952

    Hall v. Dunn, 52 Or 475 , 97 P 811 , 25 LRA NS 193; Dayton v. Board of Equalization, 33 Or 131, 136 , 50 P 1009 ; Schirott v. … In Cookinham v.

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by Meury v. Jarrell, 269 Or. 606 (1974)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Peters v. Johnson

    124 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1928

    His failure to comply with the statute in this respect constitutes negligence per se: Marshall v. Olson, 102 Or. 502 ( 202 Pac. 736 ); Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co., 97 Or. 263 ( 191 Pac. 333 ); Northwest Door Co. v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Kankkonen v. HENDRICKSON

    232 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1962

    State Land Board v. Gennies, 204 Or 443 , 283 P2d 655 (1955). The other is that “a thing once proved to exist continued as long as is usual with things of that nature.” ORS 41.360 (32). … Fink v. Prudential Insurance Co., 162 Or 37 , 90 P2d 762 (1939).

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • SAIF Corp. v. DeLeon

    352 Or. 130 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2012

    Insurer argues that, in Greenslitt v. … Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Seibel v. Liberty Homes, Inc.

    305 Or. 362 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1988

    Dehnart v. Waukesha Brewing Co., 21 Wis 2d 583 , 124 NW2d 664, 671 (1963). But compare, e.g., Rutzen v. Monroe Cty Long Term Care Program, 104 Misc. 2d 1000 , 429 NYS 2d 863, 865-66 (Sup Ct 1980), quoting Labor Board v. … Gullett Gin Co., 340 US 361, 364 , 71 S Ct 337 , 95 L Ed 337 (1951) (no offset for unemployment benefits); Brown v. A.J. Gerrard Mfg. Co., 715 F2d 1549 (11th Cir 1983); Green Forest Public Schools v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State of Oregon v. Anderson

    207 Or. 675 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1956

    See, also, State v. Carothers, 1 Greene (Iowa) 464; People v. Neff, 191 NY 286 , 84 NE 63 . … Madden v. Crawford, 207 Or 76 , 295 P2d 174 ; State v. Brumfield, 104 Or 506 , 209 P 120 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Miller v. SCHRUNK

    232 Or. 383 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1962

    Baker v. Steele, et al, 229 Or 498, 501 , 366 P2d 726 (1962). First, does the petition allege ultimate facts that the Board exceeded its jurisdiction? … The majority opinion in Safeway Stores v. State Bd. Agriculture, 198 Or 43, 53 , 255 P2d 564 (1953), and the dissent at 198 Or 103 , support City of Portland v. Garner, supra.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State v. Dilley

    15 Or. 70 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1887

    (Hastings v. Palmer, 20 Wend. 225 .) Our statute prescribes substantially the same course. (Civ. Code, § 194.) … (Shepard v. Potter, 4 Hill, 202 .) This may appear to be a very refined view of the question, but the objection to the. admission of the testimony was wholly technical.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Cabler v. Alexander

    111 Or. 257 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1924

    The court, in the case of Martin v. Hughes, 67 N. … Brown, Rand and Coshow, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Kleinsorge v. Reid

    221 Or. 558 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1960

    In Dunn et al. v. State University, 9 Or 357 , this court held that the board of directors of the. University of Oregon was a corporation. In Liggett v. … If, in due course, the action is dismissed as against the board, see Bacon v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hoffmire v. Martin

    29 Or. 240 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1896

    Anderson, 96 Ill. 372 ; Prutsman v. Baker, 30 Wis. 644 ( 11 Am. Rep. 592 ); Brown v. Brown, 66 Me. 316 ; Cook v. Brown , 34 N. H. 460; Williams v. Schatz, 42 Ohio St. 47 ; Provart v. Harriss, 150 Ill. 40 ( 36 N. … To the same effect are Lang v. Smith, 36 W. Va. 734 ( 17 S. E. 213 ); Stephens v. Rinehart, 72 Pa. St. 434; Reed v. Douthit, 62 Ill. 348 ; Hathaway v. Payne, 34 N. Y. 92 ; Wheelwright v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.