Case law

J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of Revenue

321 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1995

For example, in this case, the Tax Court discounted an appraisal performed by taxpayer’s appraiser, Brown, in part, because Brown “was not aware of $6 million of functional obsolescence in the Boardman sale and admitted * … In this case, the Tax Court overruled its previous decision in Johnson v.

Mallatt v. LUIHN

206 Or. 678 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1956

Parsons, 191 US 17 , 48 L ed 73, 24 S Ct 8 ; Brown v. New Jersey, 175 US 172, 175 , 44 L ed 119, 20 S Ct 77 ; Ex parte Reggel, 114 US 642, 651 , 29 L ed 250, 5 S Ct 1148 ; Missouri v. Lewis, 101 US 22, 31 , 25 L ed 989. … The Hurlbut case was approved and followed in Kelley v. State Board of Social Welfare, 86 Cal App2d 627, 186 P2d 429 .

Teiser v. Swirsky

137 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1931

Before the meeting of the board of directors Swirsky had conferred with *608 Cohen upon more than one occasion. … J., Brown and Band, JJ., concur.

Putnam v. Kozer

119 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1926

BROWN, J. This is an appeal from a judgment order of the Circuit Court of Oregon for Marion County, commanding Sam A. … Section 26 provides that any person desiring to vote at a primary nominating election shall declare to the clerk of his election board his name, his residence, and political party.

State v. Lyon

304 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1987

In State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), we held that polygraph evidence is not admissible, over proper objection, in any civil or criminal trial in this state. … Cullin v. State, 565 P2d 445,457 (Wyo 1977). Accord Corbett v. State, supra. We noted in Brown that the leading case on stipulations for the admission of polygraph evidence is State v.

Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4J

301 Or. 358 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1986

See, e.g., State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986)(searches and seizures), State v. Kennedy, 295 Or 260 , 666 P2d 1316 (1983)(double jeopardy); Hewitt v. … Des Moines Community School Dist., 393 US 503 , 89 S Ct 733 , 21 L Ed 2d 731 (1969); James v. Board of Education of Central Dist.

Mansker v. Astoria

100 Or. 435 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1921

See, also, McGough v. Lancaster Burial Board, L. R. 21 Q. B. Div. 323 (57 L. J. Q. B. (N. S.) 568, 36 Week. Rep. 822, 52 J. P. 740). 16, 17. … J., and McBride and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Goldstein

109 Or. 497 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1923

Tbis is a proceeding institnted by tbe state on tbe relation of tbe members of tbe Griev *498 anee Committee and of the Board of Chancellors of the Multnomah Bar Association, to disbar Morris A. … That on the 29th day of June, 1922, in the City of Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, Tom Dillon, alias Edward Brown, and John Goulen were engaged and equally concerned in the common enterprise of the illicit manufacture

Chapman v. River

100 Or. 43 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1921

BROWN, J. … "We are well aware that in other jurisdictions courts have held that, whenever power is given to establish highways by proceedings before local tribunals, such as boards of supervisors, boards of commissioners, and common

Pittenger Equipment Co. v. Timber Structures, Inc.

189 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1950

In April and May it shipped to the defendant the following invoices of lumber: 132,444 board feet, 109,221 board feet, 114,421 board feet, 98,-811 board feet, 128,156 board feet and 149,920 board feet. … Coggs, [1 Brown, Pari. Cas. 140,] and Taylor v.

West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West Linn

349 Or. 58 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 2010

The Ninth Circuit rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the city had effected a per se taking of its money and the plaintiffs citation to Brown v. … Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 142 , 117 P3d 990 (2005) (citations omitted).

McDowell v. Employment Department

348 Or. 605 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 2010

See Henthorn v. … See generally City of Portland v.

Cawston v. Sturgis

29 Or. 331 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1896

E. 355 ); Speed v. Hollingsworth, 54 Kan. 436 ( 38 Pac. 496 ); Lynch v. Mercantile Trust Company, 18 Fed. 486 ; Antle v. Sexton, 137 Ill. 410 ( 27 N. E. 691 ); Jackson v. Armstrong, 50 Mich. 65 ( 14 N. … Law), 138; Flint v. Lewis, 61 Ill. 299 ; Hallam v. Todhunter, 24 Iowa, 166 ; Sears v. Stinson, 3 Wash. 615 ( 29 Pac. 205 ).

State v. Roach

271 Or. 764 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1975

We granted defendant’s petition for review to determine the applicability of the principles announced in State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). The relevant facts are undisputed. … Brown, supra. However, as we have explained in State v. Hammang, decided this day, the principle announced in State v. Brown does not require the consolidation of charges.

Marcum v. Adventist Health System/West

345 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 2008

Brown[, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984)] and [State v.] O’Key[, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995)]. … In Jennings v.

Thorsen v. Hooper

50 Or. 497 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1908

The debt due from the Buell estate on the claim presented by Brown was not subject to attachment by Brown’s creditor at the time the writ of garnishment was served upon Thorsen, one of the administrators. … E. 660 ); Brumagin v. Tillinghast, 18 Cal. 265 ( 79 Am. Dec. 176 ); Evans v. Hughes County, 3 S. D. 244 ( 52 N. W. 1062 ); Commercial Bank of Rochester v. City of Rochester, 42 Barb. 488 ; Erkens v.

Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics Commission

300 Or. 415 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1985

Ultimate approval of the plan was vested in SAIF’s board of directors. … We last reviewed the question whether nonpenal statutes can be unconstitutional for vagueness in Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).

Hanley v. Combs

48 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1906

Dec. 384 ); Hansbrough v. Peck, 72 U. S. (5 Wall.) 497 ( 18 L. Ed. 520 ); Gibbons v. Hayden, 3 Kan. App. 38 ( 44 Pac. 445 ); Neis v. O’Brien, 12 Wash. 358 ( 41 Pac. 59 , 50 Am. St. *414 Rep. 894 ) ; Walter v. … in on his contract with plaintiff 150 head belonging to Brown if necessary.

Houston v. Zahm

65 L.R.A. 799 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1904

Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. 87 N. Y. 400 . … Curtis, 19 Pick. 459 ; Bronson v. Coffin, 108 Mass. 175 ( 11 Am. Rep. 335 ); King v. Wight, 155 Mass. 444 ( 29 N. E. 644 ). 5.

Friberg v. Elrod

136 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1930

Jackson County, supra; Memphis Trust Co. v. Brown-Ketchum Iron Works, 166 Fed. 398, 403, 405 ( 93 C. C. A. 162 ); Sweeney v. U. S., 109 U. S. 618 ( 27 L. Ed. 1053 , 3 S. Ct. 344 ). … Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.