Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

1.57s

  • State v. Brown

    347 Or. 258 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 2009

    218 P.3d 540 (2009) 347 Or. 258 STATE v. BROWN. (S057594). Supreme Court of Oregon. October 7, 2009. Petition for review allowed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Beers v. Brown

    341 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2006

    146 P.3d 884 (2006) 341 Or. 579 Beers v. Brown (S53927). Supreme Court of Oregon. October 31, 2006. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barrell v. Brown

    261 Or. 463 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1972

    In Rogers v. … In support of this argument, defendant relies upon McDaniel v. The M/V Lisholt, 180 F Supp 24 (SD NY 1959) wherein a fireman boarded the vessel knowing of danger from *471 a fire or explosion, and Bruszewski v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. BLACKETTER

    346 Or. 213 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 14, 2009

    208 P.3d 963 (2009) 346 Or. 213 BROWN v. BLACKETTER. (S057214). Supreme Court of Oregon. May 14, 2009. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Muldrick v. Brown

    37 Or. 185 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1900

    Co. v. Migeon (C. C.), 68 Fed. 811 ; Harrington *190 v. Chambers, 3 Utah, 94 ( 1 Pac. 362 ) ; Burke v. McDonald, 2 Idaho, 1022 ( 29 Pac. 98 ). Mr. … The claim is made by the defendants that this was sufficient to estop Muldrick from questioning the validity of Brown’s placer location, but Muldrick denies that Brown told him he desired the ditch and water rights for use

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    346 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2009

    205 P.3d 888 (2009) 346 Or. 116 STATE v. BROWN. No. (S056916). Supreme Court of Oregon. March 26, 2009. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hill

    345 Or. 618 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 2009

    201 P.3d 909 (2009) 345 Or. 618 BROWN v. HILL. No. (S056703). Supreme Court of Oregon. January 13, 2009. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hall

    346 Or. 65 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 2009

    204 P.3d 95 (2009) 346 Or. 65 BROWN v. HALL. No. (S056884). Supreme Court of Oregon. March 4, 2009. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    251 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1968

    State v. Chinn, 231 Or 259, 266 , 373 P2d 392 (1962). State v. Elkins, supra ( 245 Or 279 ), is in accord. … State v. Howell, 237 Or 382, 386 , 388 P2d 282 (1964). Affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    363 Or. 744 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Stephenson

    171 Or. 239 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1943

    It affected the account, not of Stephenson, but of Brown. … It was in effect a *249 forerunner of an accounting between Brown and tbe estate.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Case

    41 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1902

    Y. 227 ; Potter v. McDowell, 31 Mo. 62 ; Richardson v. Rhodus, 14 Rich. Law, 95; Weeks v. Hill, 88 Me. Ill ( 33 Atl. 778 ); Kehr v. Smith, 87 U. S. (20 Wall.) 31 . In Rose v. Dunklee, 12 Colo. … Kyle, 27 Or. 95 ( 39 Pac. 999 ); Flynn v. Baisley, 35 Or. 268 ( 57 Pac. 908 , 45 L. R. A. 645, 76 Am. St. Rep. 495 ); Mendenhall v. Elwert, 36 Or. 375 ( 52 Pac. 22 , 59 Pac. 805 ); Wright v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Becker

    135 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1930

    And so it was held in Chapman v. … excusing the delay in the filing of a reply, this court will not review the action of the trial court in refusing to permit a reply to be filed after the time provided in the code, and it was also held in Bank of Beaverton v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    344 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2008

    181 P.3d 769 (2008) 344 Or. 390 STATE v. BROWN. No. S055620. Supreme Court of Oregon. March 26, 2008. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. BLACKETTER

    343 Or. 690 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 26, 2007

    174 P.3d 1016 (2007) 343 Or. 690 BROWN v. BLACKETTER. No. S055454. Supreme Court of Oregon. December 26, 2007. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    344 Or. 280 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 2008

    180 P.3d 702 (2008) 344 Or. 280 STATE v. BROWN. No. S055707. Supreme Court of Oregon. March 5, 2008. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lloyd v. Brown

    138 Or. 58 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1930

    This court has very recently decided specifically the extent of the transcript sufficient to confer jurisdiction on the court: Walker v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. , 122 Or. 179 ( 257 P. 701 .) … As was well said in Oxman v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bartlett

    343 Or. 115 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 2007

    162 P.3d 988 (2007) 343 Or. 115 BROWN v. BARTLETT. No. S54846. Supreme Court of Oregon. June 19, 2007. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Jackson

    268 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1974

    The following statement concerning abutting property owners’ rights to the use of a street or highway has been quoted with approval in Lowell et al v. … Lowell et al v. Pendleton Auto Co., supra at 404-05. 7 Am Jur 2d 793, Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 240. Contra, Willard Hotel Co. v. District of Columbia, 23 App DC 272 (1904).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Harris

    187 Or. 658 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1950

    Appellant has cited the early case of Moore v. Floyd, 4 Or. 260 . … In Hayes v. Nourse, 107 N. Y. 577 , 14 N. E. 508 , 1 Am. St.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.