Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
1.57s
347 Or. 258 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 2009
218 P.3d 540 (2009) 347 Or. 258 STATE v. BROWN. (S057594). Supreme Court of Oregon. October 7, 2009. Petition for review allowed.
Cited 0 timesPublished341 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2006
146 P.3d 884 (2006) 341 Or. 579 Beers v. Brown (S53927). Supreme Court of Oregon. October 31, 2006. Petition for Review Denied.
Cited 3 timesPublished261 Or. 463 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1972
In Rogers v. … In support of this argument, defendant relies upon McDaniel v. The M/V Lisholt, 180 F Supp 24 (SD NY 1959) wherein a fireman boarded the vessel knowing of danger from *471 a fire or explosion, and Bruszewski v.
Cited 4 timesPublished346 Or. 213 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 14, 2009
208 P.3d 963 (2009) 346 Or. 213 BROWN v. BLACKETTER. (S057214). Supreme Court of Oregon. May 14, 2009. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished37 Or. 185 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1900
Co. v. Migeon (C. C.), 68 Fed. 811 ; Harrington *190 v. Chambers, 3 Utah, 94 ( 1 Pac. 362 ) ; Burke v. McDonald, 2 Idaho, 1022 ( 29 Pac. 98 ). Mr. … The claim is made by the defendants that this was sufficient to estop Muldrick from questioning the validity of Brown’s placer location, but Muldrick denies that Brown told him he desired the ditch and water rights for use
Cited 6 timesPublished346 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2009
205 P.3d 888 (2009) 346 Or. 116 STATE v. BROWN. No. (S056916). Supreme Court of Oregon. March 26, 2009. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished345 Or. 618 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 2009
201 P.3d 909 (2009) 345 Or. 618 BROWN v. HILL. No. (S056703). Supreme Court of Oregon. January 13, 2009. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished346 Or. 65 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 2009
204 P.3d 95 (2009) 346 Or. 65 BROWN v. HALL. No. (S056884). Supreme Court of Oregon. March 4, 2009. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished251 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1968
State v. Chinn, 231 Or 259, 266 , 373 P2d 392 (1962). State v. Elkins, supra ( 245 Or 279 ), is in accord. … State v. Howell, 237 Or 382, 386 , 388 P2d 282 (1964). Affirmed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrown v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
363 Or. 744 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text171 Or. 239 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1943
It affected the account, not of Stephenson, but of Brown. … It was in effect a *249 forerunner of an accounting between Brown and tbe estate.
Cited 3 timesPublished41 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1902
Y. 227 ; Potter v. McDowell, 31 Mo. 62 ; Richardson v. Rhodus, 14 Rich. Law, 95; Weeks v. Hill, 88 Me. Ill ( 33 Atl. 778 ); Kehr v. Smith, 87 U. S. (20 Wall.) 31 . In Rose v. Dunklee, 12 Colo. … Kyle, 27 Or. 95 ( 39 Pac. 999 ); Flynn v. Baisley, 35 Or. 268 ( 57 Pac. 908 , 45 L. R. A. 645, 76 Am. St. Rep. 495 ); Mendenhall v. Elwert, 36 Or. 375 ( 52 Pac. 22 , 59 Pac. 805 ); Wright v.
Cited 3 timesPublished135 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1930
And so it was held in Chapman v. … excusing the delay in the filing of a reply, this court will not review the action of the trial court in refusing to permit a reply to be filed after the time provided in the code, and it was also held in Bank of Beaverton v.
Cited 4 timesPublished344 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2008
181 P.3d 769 (2008) 344 Or. 390 STATE v. BROWN. No. S055620. Supreme Court of Oregon. March 26, 2008. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished343 Or. 690 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 26, 2007
174 P.3d 1016 (2007) 343 Or. 690 BROWN v. BLACKETTER. No. S055454. Supreme Court of Oregon. December 26, 2007. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished344 Or. 280 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 2008
180 P.3d 702 (2008) 344 Or. 280 STATE v. BROWN. No. S055707. Supreme Court of Oregon. March 5, 2008. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished138 Or. 58 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1930
This court has very recently decided specifically the extent of the transcript sufficient to confer jurisdiction on the court: Walker v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. , 122 Or. 179 ( 257 P. 701 .) … As was well said in Oxman v.
Cited 3 timesPublished343 Or. 115 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 2007
162 P.3d 988 (2007) 343 Or. 115 BROWN v. BARTLETT. No. S54846. Supreme Court of Oregon. June 19, 2007. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished268 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1974
The following statement concerning abutting property owners’ rights to the use of a street or highway has been quoted with approval in Lowell et al v. … Lowell et al v. Pendleton Auto Co., supra at 404-05. 7 Am Jur 2d 793, Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 240. Contra, Willard Hotel Co. v. District of Columbia, 23 App DC 272 (1904).
Cited 2 timesPublished187 Or. 658 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1950
Appellant has cited the early case of Moore v. Floyd, 4 Or. 260 . … In Hayes v. Nourse, 107 N. Y. 577 , 14 N. E. 508 , 1 Am. St.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna