Case law

Emerald PUD v. PP & L

302 Or. 256 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1986

See Brown, People's Utility Districts in Oregon, 20 Or.L.Rev. 3, 3 n 1, 6-8 (1940) (discussion of history of amendment). … (Emphasis added.) [3] Compare Eckles v.

Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. Wasco County

210 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1957

Nottage v. City of Portland, 35 Or 539 , 58 P 883 ; Thomas v. City of Portland, 40 Or 50 , 66 P 439 ; and Brown v. City of Silverton, 97 Or 441 , 190 P 971 , affirm the rule of which we have just taken note. Watson v. … (See concurring opinion of Belt, J., in Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People’s Utility District v.

Russell v. Ford Motor Co.

281 Or. 587 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1978

White Motor Corp., 260 Or 251 , 490 P2d 184 (1971), 4 and in *593 the home, Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co., 262 Or 293 , 498 P2d 766 (1972). Finally, Brown v. … See Brown v. Western Farmers Association, supra, 268 Or at 476-478 .

Phipps v. Stancliff

110 Or. 299 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1924

This policy has been strictly adhered to ever since: Frink v. Thomas, 20 Or. 265 ( 25 Pac. 717 , 12 L. R. A. 239); Robertson v. State Land Board, 42 Or. 183 (70 Pac. 614); Weatherford v. … J., and Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

In Re Richter's Estate

181 Or. 360 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1947

*Page 373 "In Brown v. … Rep. 570 ; Logan v. Brown , 20 Okla. 334 , 95 P. 441 , 20 L.R.A., (N.S.) 298.

Consolidated Ranches, Inc. v. Chase Land & Cattle Co.

242 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1965

Brown called the Mayfields while Eslinger was in Brown’s office, and both Eslinger and Brown informed them that they would receive the $25,000. … Company v. Oregon Automobile Ins. Company, 242 Or 407 , 408 P2d 198 (1965). Affirmed.

State v. Henley

363 Or. 284 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 19, 2018

E.g. , State v. … See also State v.

Major Creek Lum. Co. v. Johnson

99 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1921

The board of trustees transacted their business in a dwelling-house, or some such place. … Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 92 Ala. 145 ( 9 South. 136 ), the head-note reads: “A contract for the purchase of goods, made between a citizen of Alabama and a Missouri corporation, whether made in Alabama or Missouri, is within

State v. Burke

126 Or. 651 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1928

BROWN, J. Section 187, Chapter 207, General Laws of Oregon, 1925, codified as Or. … Hardin, 63 Or. 305 ( 127 Pac. 789 ); State v. Hill, 63 Or. 451 ( 128 Pac. 444 ); State v. Russell, 64 Or. 247 ( 129 Pac. 1051 ); State v. McPherson, 69 Or. 381 ( 138 Pac. 1076 ); State v.

Campbell v. City of Eugene

116 Or. 264 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1925

Leser v. Board of Registry, 139 Md. 46, 73 ( 114 Atl. 840 ).” Ib. (b): “A proposal to amend the state constitution is not legislation.” Warfield v. Vandiver, 101 Md. 78 ( 60 Atl. 538, 542, 543 , 4 Ann. Cas. 692). Ib. … Justice Brown in the ease of State ex rel. v.

Williams v. Gratton

136 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1931

*226 BROWN, J. In support of his petition for attorney fees, Mr. Seabrook testified: “Q. … There must be an agreement, express or implied, for compensation. ’ ’ As we stated in the Faling Case, the case of Forman v. Sewerage & Water Board, 119 La. 49 ( 43 So. 908 , 12 Ann.

State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Whited

239 Or. 149 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1964

The party asserting unconstitutionality labors under a heavy burden of proof: Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, supra; Schmidt v. City of Cornelius, 1957, 211 Or 505 , 316 P2d 511 ; Port of Umatilla v. … Richardson, 1906, 48 Or 309 , 85 P 225 , and may be entirely prohibited: Brown and Bennett v. Powers, 1910, 146 Iowa 729 , 125 NW 833 : Twenty-first Amendment.

Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.

133 Or. 468 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1929

*475 BROWN, J. … A. 585; Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 11, 18 , 116 N. E. 684 , Ann. Cas. 1918B 764, 14 N. C. C. A. 125.)” To the same effect, see Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co., 108 Kan. 320 ( 195 P. 863 , 19 A. L.

State v. Lord

31 L.R.A. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1896

Allen, J., in People v. Canal Board, 55 N. … Brown, 1 Swanst. 265; Attorney-General v. Mayor of Dublin, 1 Bligh (N. S.), 312; Attorney-General v. Eastlake, 45 Eng. Ch. 218-221.

Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. Patterson

124 Or. 112 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1927

BROWN, J. … A. 336); Council Bluffs v. Stewart, 51 Iowa, 385 ( 1 N. W. 628 ); French v. Burlington, 42 Iowa, 614 ; City of Springfield v. Edwards, 84 Ill. 632 ; Law v. People, 87 Ill. 385 ; Prince v.

Teiser v. Swirsky

137 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1931

Before the meeting of the board of directors Swirsky had conferred with *608 Cohen upon more than one occasion. … J., Brown and Band, JJ., concur.

Saif Corp. v. Thompson

360 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 2016

SAIF v. Thompson, 267 Or App 356, 340 P3d 163 (2014). … In Wright v.

Waller v. Lane County

155 Or. 160 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1936

The case of Cropper v. Brown, 76 N. J. Eq. 406 ( 74 Atl. 987 , 139 Am. St. Rep. 770 ), presents an interesting discussion of the point here involved. … Francis v. Board of Review of Peoria County, 231 Ill. 317 ( 83 N. E. 272 , and Trustees of Kentucky Female Orphans’ School v. Louisville, 100 Ky. 470 (19 Ky. L. Rep. 1091, 36 S. W. 921 , 40 L. R.

State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. Felton

350 Or. 592 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 1, 2011

Sopher v. Board of Parole, 233 Or App 178 , 225 P3d 836 (2010) (Sopher II). … State v. Engweiler, 118 Or App 132 , 846 P2d 1163 , rev den, 317 Or 486 (1993) 9Engweiler I). 2. Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 197 Or App 43 , 103 P3d 1201 (2005) (Engweiler IP). 3. Engweiler v.

Johnson v. CRADDOCK

228 Or. 308 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1961

Riesland v. Bailey, 146 Or 574, 578 , 31 P2d 183 , 92 ALR 1207 ; Ruonala v. Board of County Commissioners, 212 Or 309, 318 , 319 P2d 898 . … Board of Public Service, 81 Ohio St 218, 90 NE 389, 391 ; Brown v. City of Houston (Tex Civ App 1898), 48 SW 760 ; Fetters v. Mayor & Council of Wilmington, 31 Del Ch 364, 74 A2d 470, 471 ; State v.