Case law

Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources Commission

345 Or. 56 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 2008

See Brown v. Baker, 39 Or 66, 72-73 , 65 P 799 (1901) (identifying origin of appropriation doctrine as local mining customs throughout the “Pacific Coast” during and subsequent to California gold rush). … Dist. v.

Thompson Optical Institute v. Thompson

119 Or. 252 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1925

BROWN, J. Robert A. Thompson, defendant herein, R. A. Thompson, and Dr. Thompson are one and the same person. *255 The defendant, by his counsel, has carried on a vigorous defense to plaintiff’s suit. … . *263 In Thorn v.

State Accident Insurance Fund v. Anderson

321 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1995

In Anderson , the Court of Appeals relied on this court’s opinion in Brown v. … [Brown,] 284 Or at 602 .” Anderson, 124 Or App at 654 .

Goldsmith v. The Revenue Cutter

6 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877

(Briggs v. Light Boats, 11 Allen, 157 .) … In the ease of United States v.

State v. Claypool

145 Or. 615 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1934

There must be deception and change of conduct in consequence, in order to estop a party from showing the truth. 2 Story’s Equity Jurisprudence, sec. 1543; People v. Brown, 67 Ill. 435 . … Swift v. Board of Com’rs of Hennepin County, 76 Minn. 194 ( 78 N. W. 1107 ).

Houghton & Palmer v. Beck

9 Or. 325 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1881

(Kelly v. Barnett, 16 How. Pr. R., 135; Fairchild v. Gwynne, 9 Abb. Pr., 23 .) … (Ross v. Hamilton, 3 Barb., 610 ; Blake v. Graves, et al., 18 Iowa, 313 .)

Cannon v. Farmers' Union Grain Agency

103 Or. 26 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1921

L.; Kyle v. Puppy, 19 Or. 186 ( 25 Pac. 141); Flegel v. Koss, 47 Or. 366, 370 ( 83 Pac. 847 ); Lewis v. Clark, 66 Or. 461, 463 ( 134 Pac. 1194 ); Warren v. Dinwoodie, 88 Or. 342, 344 ( 171 Pac. 1175 ); Bailey v. … Stutz, supra, evidence was admitted showing the proceedings of a school board which were not recorded.

Landauer v. State Industrial Accident Commission

175 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1944

E. 49 ; Bushnell v. Ind. Board, 276 Ill. 262 , 114 N. E. 496 ; Haiselden v. Ind. Board, 275 Ill. 114 , 113 N. E. 877 . Kansas: Gen. Stat. 1915, §§ 5896-5942; Pittman v. … Chmielewska v. Butte & Superior Mining Co., 81 Mont. 36 , 261 P. 616 . (Death case.) New Hampshire: Laws, 1911, Ch. 163; Brown v. Comvay Electric Light and Power Co., 82 N. H. 78, 129 A. 633 . New Jersey: Mahoney v.

Spokane County v. Pacific Bridge Co.

106 Or. 550 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1923

Edmunson, 87 Or. 476, 487 ( 171 Pac. 186 ); Cathcart v. Marshfield, 89 Or. 401 ( 174 Pac. 138 ); Duniway v. Hadley, 91 Or. 343, 346 ( 178 Pac. 942 ); State v. … v.

Thielsen v. Linde

127 Or. 639 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1927

Co. v. Spillman, 23 Or. 587 ( 32 Pac. 688 ), and authorities there cited. … Brown, J., concurs. Rossman, J., concurs in the result. Coshow, J., did not participate in this opinion.

Witham v. McNutt

186 Or. 668 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1949

Brown v. Bailey, 151 Or. 496 , 51 P. 2d 671 , the proceeding was in the nature of quo warranto. There was a failure to post one of the required notices in one of the precincts. … Instructions and all other election board supplies were also furnished.

Brady v. East Portland Sheet Metal Works

222 Or. 584 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1960

The agreed commission for performance by plaintiff was that provided by Portland Eealty Board rules. … This procedure is pursuant to the holding in Brown v. Bonesteele, 218 Or 312 , 344 P2d 928 .

Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

298 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1984

The following year, in Brown v. … We are aware of the dicta in Brown v.

Hurlburt v. Morris

68 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1913

Brown, were paid to him. … Rep. 501); Kilbourn v. Sunderland, 130 U. S. 505, 514 ( 32 L. Ed. 1005 , 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 594); Clews v. Jamieson, 182 U. S. 461, 478, 481 ( 45 L. Ed. 1183 , 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 845).

Rockwood & Co. v. Parrott & Co.

142 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1933

Potter v. Shields, 174 Mich. 121 ( 140 N. W. 500 ); Fruit Dispatch Co. v. C. C. Taft Co., 197 Iowa 409 ( 197 N. W. 302 ); Seefus v. DeVaughn, 108 Neb. 628 ( 188 N. W. 235 ); Leonard Seed Co. v. … Dollen & Sons v. Carl R. Miller Tractor Co., 241 N. W. 307; Tamkin v. Nelson-Dowling Coal Co., 82 N. H. 96 ( 130 Atl. 26 ); Smith v. Bank of State Riley Ch. (S. C.) 152; Habersham v. Rodrigues, 1 Speers (S.

Gerber v. Multnomah County

143 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1933

See also: Bailey v. Benton County, 61 Or. 390 ( 111 P. 376 , 122 P. 755 ); Gigoux v. Yamhill County, 73 Or. 212 ( 144 P. 437 ); Spencer v. School District No. 1, 121 Or. 511 ( 254 P. 357 ). … Although defendant referred to this motion as one for a directed verdict, it was in effect nothing more than a motion for an involuntary nonsuit: Wicks v. Sanborn, 72 Or. 321 ( 143 P. 1007 ); Brown v.

Mt. Sexton Properties, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

306 Or. 465 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1988

Greene v. Lindsey, 456 US 444, 450 , 102 S Ct 1874 , 72 L Ed 2d 249 (1982). The cases on which plaintiffs rely, beginning with Mullane and extending to Mennonite Board of Missions v. … Brown v. City of Salem, 251 Or 150, 155 , 444 P2d 936 (1968) (quoting Utley v. St. Petersburg, 292 US 106, 109 , 54 S Ct 593 , 78 L Ed 1155 (1934)).

Deniff v. Charles R. McCormick & Co.

105 Or. 697 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1922

L.; State v. Hembree, 54 Or. 463 ( 103 Pac. 1008 ); Stamm v. Wood, 86 Or. 174 ( 168 Pac. 69 ); State v. Rader, 94 Or. 432, 456 ( 186 Pac. 79 ). … McBride, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Buckley

18 Or. 228 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1889

When he was not under oath he made statements to the police officers of the city of Portland tending to show that one Brown had made a felonious assault upon him with a knife; but, when the charge against Brown was examined … If it had been proven upon the trial that Brown did in fact stab the defendant in the abdomen, then it might have been claimed that the case was brought within the principle of U. S. v. Brown, 21 Pac. Rep. 461 .

State ex rel. Pierce v. Slusher

119 Or. 141 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1926

Law, 193, 195; Maine v. Waterville Savings Bank, 68 Me. 515 ; Union Pac. *149 R. R. Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 217 Fed. 540 ( 133 C. C. A. 392 ) (this case was reversed on another point); Flanigan v. … Medford, 81 Or. 119 ( 156 Pac. 787 , 158 Pac. 666 ); Wagoner v. LaGrande, 89 Or. 192 ( 173 Pac. 305 ); Brown v. Silverton, 97 Or. 441 ( 190 Pac. 971 ); Spencer v. Merchant, 100 N. Y. 585 ( 3 N. E. 682 ); Id., 125 U.