Case law

Umpqua Valley Bank v. Wilson

120 Or. 396 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1926

This distinction was pointed out in the recent case of Beall v. Board of Trade, 164 Mo. App. 186 ( 148 S. … Brown, Belt and Rand, JJ., concur.

Central Oregon Irr. Co. v. Public Service Commission

101 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1921

.” *463 The case of Thayer v. … J., and Brown, J., took no part in the consideration of this case.

State v. Anderson

242 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1965

State v. Byrd, 240 Or 159 , 400 P2d 522 (1965). … McGowen v.

Rockwell v. Portland Savings Bank

39 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1901

It was held in Kellogg v. Miller, 22 Or. 406 ( 29 Am. St. … That was the payment of an independent obligation of Browne’s, and would seem, under some of the authorities, not to be a valuable consideration, within the doctrine invoked: Solary v. Stultz, 22 Pla. 263.

Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of Portland

43 L.R.A. 435 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1899

Rep. 3 ; Ogg v. Lansing, 35 Iowa, 495 , 14 Am. Rep. 499 ; Brown v. Inhabitants of Vinalhaven, 65 Me. 402 , 20 Am. Rep. 709 ; Barbour v. … Rep. 357 ; Pittsburgh City v. Grier, 22 Pa. 54 , 60 Am. Dec. 65 ; Mersey Docks Board v. Gibbs, 11 H. L. Cas. 686).

Fleischner v. Florey

111 Or. 35 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1924

Ed. 531 ); United States v. Keehler, 76 U. S. 83 ( 19 L. Ed. 574 ); Cameron v. Hicks, 65 W. Va. 484 ( 64 S. E. 832 , 17 Ann. Cas. 926); Pine Island Board of Ed. v. Jewell, 44 Minn. 427 ( 20 Am. St. Rep. 586 , 46 N. … J., and Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

Drainage District No. 7 v. Bernards

89 Or. 531 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1918

Board of Commrs. of Polk County, 87 Minn. 325 ( 92 N. W. 216 , 60 L. R. A. 161). To the same effect are: Laguna Drainage Dist. v. Charles Martin Co., 144 Cal. 209, 214 ( 77 Pac. 933 ), and Brown v. Keener, 74 N. … Rep. 750); Ross v. Board of Supervisors, 128 Iowa, 427 ( 104 N. W. 506 , 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 431); Spencer v. Merchant, 125 U. S. 345, 355 ( 31 L. Ed. 763 , 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 921); Phipps v.

State v. Meharry

342 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2006

See State v. … See State v. Kosta, 304 Or 549, 555 , 748 P2d 72 (1987) (recognizing that vehicle’s inherent mobility creates exigency); State v. Bennett, 301 Or 299, 301 , 721 P2d 1375 (1986) (same); Brown, 301 Or at 278 (same).

Gulick v. Copeland

186 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1949

Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co., 45 Or. 335 , 77 P. 485 ; Crider v. Turnbow, 162 Or. 622 , 94 P. (2d) 285 . Defendant is seeking equitable relief, and, being in a court of equity, he must do equity. … Brown’s act in giving plaintiffs credit for $300 on the purchase price, plaintiffs quote from Cranston v. West Coast Life Ins.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Moore

299 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1985

Both the Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found that the transaction was a loan. … In re Brown, 298 Or 285, 291 , 692 P2d 107 (1984).

Koennecke v. Waxwing Cedar Products, Ltd.

273 Or. 639 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1975

Browne said they were not going to carry the fire insurance because you had it; is that right? “A Yeah.” We find nothing in the transcript to prompt us to take a different view of the testimony. See Cook v. … In Waterway Terminals v. P. S.

State v. Knowles

289 Or. 803 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1980

State v. Brown and State v. Hammang, both supra, were concerned with the Oregon Constitution. … The distinction, however, was not preserved in State v. Brown. STATE V. BROWN ANALYZED Any attempt at straightforward statutory analysis of double jeopardy founders on our decision in State v.

State v. Boyd

271 Or. 558 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1975

The trial court granted this motion upon the authority of State v. Brown, supra. … State v.

State v. Leverich

269 Or. 45 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1974

Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). … ORS 134.140 (2); State v. Mayes, 245 Or 179, 184 , 421 P2d 385 (1966).

Rohrbacher v. Strain

95 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1920

Thus in Keady v. United Rys. Co., 57 Or. 325 ( 100 Pac. 658 , 108 Pac. 197 ), it was held that the undertaking on appeal might be examined to identify the judgment appealed from, citing also Moorhouse v. … Donica, 13 Or. 435 ( 11 Pac. 71 ); Salem Traction Co. v. Anson, 41 Or. 562 ( 67 Pac. 1015 , 69 Pac. 675 ).

Kidder v. Nekoma Lumber Co.

196 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1952

Phillips v. Graves, 139 Or 336, 349 , 9 P2d 490 , 83 ALR 1 ; McKinley et al. v. Tice et al., 129 Or 190, 196 , 276 P 1110 ; Spratt v. Brown-Petzel Lumber Co., 105 Or 672, 680 , 210 P 700 . … Hospes v. Lumberman’s Board of Exchange, 33 Minn 471, 23 NW 838 . Common knowledge, as well as the foregoing definition, teaches that scaling does not comprehend assistance “in obtaining or securing sawlogs”.

Golden Shear Barber Shop v. Morgan

258 Or. 105 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1971

Compensation Com. v. … Co. v. State U. C.

State v. Leland

190 Or. 598 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1951

State v. … Lemon v.

Slate Construction Co. v. Pacific General Contractors, Inc.

226 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1961

Tolman, 12 Or. 289 , 7 Pac. 103 ; Morrill v. Morrill, 20 Or 96 , 25 Pac. 362 , 11 L.R.A. 155 , 23 Am St. Rep. 95; Belle v. *150 Brown, 37 Or. 588 , 61 Pac. 1024 ; White v. Ladd, 41 Or. 324 , 68 Pac. 739 , 93 Am. St. … A meeting of the Board of Directors of Pacific was held on October 30,1948.

Cain v. Rijken

300 Or. 706 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1986

As this court stated in Stewart v. … As we said in Nylander v.