Case law

In re Crum

103 Or. 296 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1922

People v. Amos, 246 Ill. 299 ( 92 N. E. 857 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 239 ). … People v. Amos, supra, note, 138 Am. St. Rep., page 243. *302 In People v. MacCabe, 18 Colo. 186 ( 32 Pac. 280 , 36 Am. St. Rep. 270 , 19 L. R.

Chocktoot v. Smith

280 Or. 567 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1977

Brown’s claim depended on whether he was the son of James Brown, the divorced husband of his mother, Rena Chocktoot Brown. … Reversed and remanded. 1 Cf O’Toole v. Franklin, 279 Or 513 , 569 P2d 561 (1977); McEvoy v. Helikson, 277 Or 781 , 562 P2d 540 (1977). 2 See, e.g,, Christy v. Saliterman, 288 Minn 144, 179 NW2d 288 (1970); Fuschetti v.

State v. Fuller

354 Or. 295 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 3, 2013

Like the defendant in State v. … As discussed in Benoit, this court determined in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

State v. Woodley

306 Or. 458 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1988

Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977). … Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19, 300 Or 507 , 716 P2d 724 (1986); Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).

Lange v. St. Johns Lumber Co.

115 Or. 337 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1925

Phillips v. Library Co., 55 N. J. L. 307, 310 ( 27 Atl. 478, 479 ). In Kelley v. … Brown, Rand and Belt, JJ., concur.

King v. Miller

53 Or. 53 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1908

Law (2 ed.), 882; Brown v. Scott, 25 Cal. 189 ; Heisen v. Smith, 138 Cal. 216 ( 71 Pac. 180 : 94 Am. St. Rep. 39 ; Bolen v. Crosby, 49 N. Y., 183 . 2. … Hawes, Parties, § 34; Sheridan v. Mayor, 68 N. Y. 30 ; Allen v. Brown, 44 N. Y. 228 ; Curtin v. Kowalsky, 145 Cal. 431 ( 78 Pac. 962 ).

Boldman v. Mt. Hood Chemical Corp.

288 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1979

Witt v. Jackson, 57 Cal2d 57, 17 Cal Rptr 369, 366 P2d 641 (1961); Brown v. Southern By. Co., 204 NC 668, 169 SE 419 (1933); Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Adams, 91 Idaho 151 , 417 P2d 417, 420-423 (1966). … Any conflict as to what may be a just and proper distribution shall be resolved by the board [Workers’ Compensation Board].”

Dodds v. Mayer Et Ux.

135 Or. 43 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 1930

The parol evidence rule would not have excluded proof that a part of the consideration for the deed was a promise upon the part of the Mayers to provide board and lodging for the grantor: Brown v. … Cahalin, 3 Or. 45 ; Watson v. Smith, 7 Or. 448 ; Houston v. Greiner, 73 Or. 304 , ( 144 P. 133 ); Savage v. Scroggin, 83 Or. 51 , ( 162 P. 1061 ); Devlin on Real Property (3d Ed.) § 807.

Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.

86 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1917

In Brown v. Buffalo etc. R. Co., 27 Hun (N. … We infer that Brown v. Buffalo etc. R. Co., 27 Hun (N. Y.), 342, was also a case involving the rights of preferred stock. The case of Robinson v. Smith, 3 Paige (N. Y.), 222, 231 ( 24 Am.

State v. Kock

302 Or. 29 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1986

As emphasized in State v. Brown, supra, and State v. Bennett, 301 Or 299 , 721 P2d 1375 (1986), the police need clear guidelines for their actions. … See California v. Carney, 471 US 386 , 105 S Ct 2066 , 85 L Ed 2d 406 (1985). On the other hand, constitutional scholars, see State v. Brown, supra, 301 Or at 279 (Linde, J., dissenting); State v.

In re Ramirez

Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2018

The Culp v. … Lenske, 269 Or at 164; see also State v.

Temple v. Osburn

55 Or. 506 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1910

Brown, and it could not possibly have any greater effect—Price v. Sisson, 13 N. J. … Pancoast v. Duval, 26 N. J. Eq. 445, 448; Dickerson v. *511 Tillinghast, 4 Paige, 215 ( 25 Am. Dec. 528 ) ; Mingus v. Condit, 28 N. J. Eq. 318; Cary v. White, 52 N. Y. 139 ; Wells v. Morrow, 38 Ala. 125 . 5.

State v. Pinnell

311 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1991

State v. Douglas, 310 Or 438, 440 , 800 P2d 288 (1990); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 350 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … See State v.

In re Clark

79 Or. 325 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1916

Brown, Attorney General, and Mr. Walter H. Evans, District Attorney, contra. In Banc. Mr. Justice Burnett delivered the opinion of the court. … The rule on such subjects is well stated in State ex rel. v.

Stout v. State Industrial Accident Commission

172 Or. 346 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1943

Brown say to you? A. Mr. … Brown were owned by Mr. Brown. The ore also belonged to Mr. Brown. Transporting one’s property does not constitute transportation for hire. Weller v. Kolb's Bakery & Dairy, 176 Md. 191 , 4 A. (2d) 130, 132.

Carmichael v. Carmichael

106 Or. 198 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1923

BROWN, J. Did the court err in overruling plaintiff’s motion as to the matter alleged in bar of his suit? *203 Plaintiff charged impotency on the part of the defendant. … Taylor, 11 Or. 303 ( 8 Pac. 354 ); Adams v. Adams, 12 Or. 176 (6 Pac. 677); Wheeler v. Wheeler, 18 Or. 261 ( 24 Pac. 900 ); Mendelson v. Mendelson, 37 Or. 163 ( 61 Pac. 645 ); Crim v.

In re Ramirez

Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2018

The Culp v. … Lenske, 269 Or at 164; see also State v.

Younger v. City of Portland

305 Or. 346 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1988

Christian Retreat Center v. Board of Commissioners of Washington County, 28 Or App 673 , 560 P2d 1100 ; rev den (1977).” Younger v. City of Portland,_Or LUBA_(86-046) (January 30,1987) (slip op at 21-22). … See also Brown v.

Heisley v. Eastman

102 Or. 137 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1921

Brown could not: Shaw v. … A. 484); McBroom v. Thompson, 25 Or. 559, 566 ( 37 Pac. 57 , 42 Am. St. Rep. 806 ); Shaw v. Proffitt, 57 Or. 192, 212 ( 109 Pac. 584 , 110 Pac. 1092 , Ann. Cas. 1913A, 63); Kelsey v.

In re Ramirez

Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2018

The Culp v. … Lenske, 269 Or at 164; see also State v.