Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

0.79s

  • Silverton v. Brown

    63 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1912

    See Lais v. Smith, 63 Or. 206 ( 127 Pac. 26 ) ; Quinn v. Willamette Pulp & Paper Co., 62 Or. 549 ( 126 Pac. 1 ). We think this question was properly submitted to the jury. … Schooling v. Harrisburg, 42 Or. 494 ( 71 Pac. 605 ). 6, 7.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dorfman

    251 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1968

    See Trotter v. Town of Stayton, 45 Or 301 , 77 P 395 (1904); Starr v. Stark, 7 Or 500 (1879). … See McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific, 245 Or 247 , 421 P2d 957 (1966); Williams v. Goose Lake Valley Irr. Co., 83 Or 302, 310 , 163 P 81 (1917).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hilleary

    147 Or. 185 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1934

    See Leahy v. Cardwell, 14 Or. 172 ( 12 P. 307 ); Morse v. Maerum; 22 Or. 229 ( 29 P. 615 , 30 P. 73 ); Sappingfield v. … In Leahy v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lowe v. Brown

    114 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1925

    This is settled by the amount of the judgment demanded in the complaint: Troy v. Hallgarth , 35 Or. 162 ( 57 P. 374 ); Ferguson v. Beyers , 40 Or. 468 ( 67 P. 1115 , 69 P. 32 ). The plaintiff contends for $250. … Brown, the defendant, upon divers occasions declared that W.L. Lowe, plaintiff herein, was a sheep thief.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • McGuire v. Brown

    217 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1959

    The Act deals with practical matters, and its phraseology should receive practical construction. * * *” Kosmecki v. Portland Stevedoring Co., 190 Or 85, 94 , 223 P2d 1035 . And from Inwall v. … Claussen v. Ireland, 216 Or 289 , 338 P2d 676 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Denton

    257 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1970

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McCormick v. Brown

    356 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 19, 2014

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Pat McCORMICK and Scott Dahlman, Petitioners, v. … Appellate judgment to issue forthwith. 2 McCormick v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mills

    350 Or. 716 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 2011

    260 P.3d 493 (2011) 350 Or. 716 BROWN v. MILLS. (S059407). Supreme Court of Oregon. September 15, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hazell v. Brown

    350 Or. 573 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2011

    258 P.3d 1239 (2011) 350 Or. 573 HAZELL v. BROWN. (S059245). Supreme Court of Oregon. August 18, 2011. Petition for Review Allowed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Sheedy

    90 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1918

    Justice Lord in Galvin v. … Chief Justice Bean, in Reynolds v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Eoff

    271 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1975

    In the essentially similar case of Shepard v. Purvine, ⑥ plaintiffs and defendants likewise disagreed on the duration of the license that admittedly had been given. … Plaintiff testified in answer to a question on whether the escrow had been completed: “No, I don’t think so.” ④ Heisley v. Eastman, 102 Or 137 , 201 P 872 (1921). ⑤ Id.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Moss

    53 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1909

    has not been executed in the form required by law to entitle, it to record, it may be that its proof cannot be made by a certified copy, and that the spreading of it upon the record of the county is a nullity: Musgrove v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ritterman

    156 Or. 405 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1937

    In Schultz v. Walrad, 92 Or. 315 ( 179 P. 904, 991 ), it was held that the court had no jurisdiction to extend the time for filing of the transcript on appeal until a notice of appeal had been served, citing Wolf v. … In Hay v. Yokell, 147 Or. 148 ( 32 P. (2d) 578 ), the plaintiff served and filed notice of appeal on May 26, 1933.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. BELLEQUE

    350 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2011

    253 P.3d 1079 (2011) 350 Or. 230 BROWN v. BELLEQUE. (S059260). Supreme Court of Oregon. April 7, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Drake

    103 Or. 607 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1922

    The view that a revivor against the executor is a sufficient presentation was taken in this state in the case of The Home v. Selling, 91 Or. 428 ( 179 Pac. 261 ). … executrix; or he could at any time before the closing of the estate and within one year after the death of Drake have applied to the court for leave to have the action continued against the executrix, as was done in The Home v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. BELLEQUE

    349 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2010

    246 P.3d 482 (2010) 349 Or. 370 BROWN v. BELLEQUE. (S058820). Supreme Court of Oregon. December 9, 2010. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. NOOTH

    349 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2010

    246 P.3d 482 (2010) 349 Or. 370 BROWN v. NOOTH. (S058736). Supreme Court of Oregon. December 9, 2010. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    349 Or. 171 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 2010

    243 P.3d 69 (2010) 349 Or. 171 STATE v. BROWN. (S058713). Supreme Court of Oregon. October 7, 2010. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spalding v. Brown

    36 Or. 160 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1899

    Dec. 251 ) ; Wallace v. John stone, 129 U. S. 58 (9 Sup. Ct. 243); Conway's Ex'rs v. Alexander, 11 U. S. (7 Cranch) 218 ; Henley v. Hotaling, 41 Cal. 22 ; Slutz v. Desenberg, 28 Ohio. St. 371; Paige v. … Vilhac, 42 Cal. 75 ; Glover v. Payn, 19 Wend. 518 ; Smith v. Crosby, 47 Wis. 160 ( 2 N. W. 104 ); Hays v. Carr, 83 Ind. 275 ; 1 Beach, Mod. Eq. Jur. § 414; 15 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (1 ed.), 785.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Brown

    264 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1973

    Thomas v. … In Downey v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.