Case law

Institute for Justice v. Hawkins

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 9, 2019

Utah Wilderness All. v. Palma, 707 F.3d 1143, 1153 (10th Cir. 2013) (quoting Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1253-54 (10th Cir. 2007)) (internal citation omitted); see also, Brown v. … Brown, 822 F.3d at 1164 (citing Summers v. Earth Island Inst., 555 U.S. 488, 492–93, 129 S.Ct. 1142, 173 L.Ed.2d 1 (2009)).

Rigsby v. Oklahoma State of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 21, 2021

See Hensel v. Office of the Chief Admin. Hearing Officer, 38 F.3d 505, 508 (10th Cir. 1994) (Oklahoma); Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 551 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2007)(California)(citations omitted). … Williams v. Meese, 926 F.2d 994, 996 (10th Cir. 1991).

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Zaina Restaurant, Inc. d/b/a ZamZam Mediterranean Grill et al.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 13, 2026

Khalik v. United Air Lines, 671 F.3d 1188, 1190 (10th Cir. 2012) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … J & J Sports Prods., 2016 WL 8650479, at *1 (internal quotation marks omitted); see also J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Brown, No. CIV-08-482-M, 2009 WL 3157369, at *3 (W.D. Okla.

Coyle v. Skirvin

38 F. Supp. 174 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1941

Quincy v. Steel, 120 U.S. 241 , 7 S.Ct. 520 , 30 L.Ed. 624 ; Wathen v. Jackson Oil & Refining Co., 235 U.S. 635 , 35 S.Ct. 225 , 59 L.Ed. 395 , Stone v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc. [5 Cir.], 56 F.(2d) 553 . Cf. … In Ames v.

Carroll v. United States

227 F. Supp. 3d 1242 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 3, 2017

Laughter Smith, who was also traveling westbound on 1—44, approached the scene while driving a school bus from Riverside Indian School, a Native American boarding facility in Anadarko, Oklahoma. Upon observing Ms. … McBride v.

Hetronic International Inc v. Hetronic Germany GMBH

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 8, 2019

United States v. Schneider, 594 F.3d 1219, 1228 (10th Cir. 2010) (quoting from Life Plus Int'l v. … Brown, 317 F.3d 1 Many of plaintiff’s objections plainly disregard the court’s carefully-explained conclusion (doc. no. 310, at 41, et seq.) that there are triable issues of fact as to the defenses of waiver and acquiescence

LITTLE GIANT PUMP CO. v. Diversitech Corp.

505 F. Supp. 2d 1107 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 24, 2007

Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 , 102 S.Ct. 2799 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982). … AquaTex Indus., Inc. v. Techniche Solutions, 419 F.3d 1374, 1382 (Fed.Cir.2005).

Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

715 F. Supp. 1055 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1989

See United States v. 677.50 Acres of Land in Marion County, Kansas, supra. … While it is true that property interests may be created by independent sources such as state statutory law, Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

Jolayemi

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 4, 2026

Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991); see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam). But the court cannot serve as Petitioner’s advocate, creating arguments on his behalf. See Yang v. … is permitted to seek review of such order by the Board of Immigration Appeals”).

Taken v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

934 F. Supp. 1294 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1996

In the leading case on the subject, DeCintio v. … Browning-Ferris, 833 P.2d 1218 (Okla.1992), and what the effect of List v. Anchor Paint Mfg. Co., 910 P.2d 1011 (Okla. *1302 1996), may be.

Maher ex rel. Estate of Maher v. Oklahoma ex rel. Tourism & Recreation Department

165 F. Supp. 3d 1089 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 29, 2016

Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1164 (10th Cir.2011) (internal quotations omitted). … See Porro v.

United States v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

112 F. Supp. 646 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1953

In United States v. South Buffalo R. Co., Judge Augustus N. … Justice Clarke in Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v.

Professional Construction Consultants, Inc. v. Grimes

552 F. Supp. 539 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1982

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 2213 n. 10, 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, at 153 , 99 S.Ct. 970, at 973 , 59 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979); Parklane Hosiery Co. v. … United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., supra; Knickerbocker Agency v. Holz, supra.

United States v. Bradshaw

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 17, 2024

No. 10-1 at 22–23]; a complaint filed by the Oklahoma State Board of Osteopathic Examiners (“Osteopathic Board”) on February 15, 2024, against Dr. Bradshaw [Doc. … Most of the conduct underlying the Osteopathic Board’s findings appears to have occurred after the conduct underlying the sixteen violations here. With that said, the Osteopathic Board found that Dr.

Simco-Horvath v. Brewer

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2022

No. 17) that dismissed Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, rendering moot that party’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. … See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, these Motions to Dismiss (Doc.

Nichols v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

948 F. Supp. 988 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1996

See Wagner & Brown v. Ward Petroleum Corp., 876 F.Supp. 255 (W.D.Okla.1994). In Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. … The Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Byus v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., 912 P.2d 845 (Okla.1996) and Willard v.

Walker

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 14, 2025

Defendants, as invitors, “[have] the duty to exercise reasonable 8 Brown v. Perez, 835 F.3d 1223, 1232 (10th Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Trevizo v. … Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 144 F.3d 664, 672 (10th Cir. 1998). 12Martinez v. Angel Expl., LLC, 798 F.3d 968, 974 (10th Cir. 2015) (citing Scott v.

Missouri-K.-T. R. v. Sanders

45 F. Supp. 602 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1942

People v. New York, etc., R. Co., 22 Hun.(N.Y.) 533.” In Jones v. … Co. v.

Ingram v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

888 F. Supp. 2d 1241 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 18, 2012

Co., Ltd. v. … Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 , 102 S.Ct. 2799 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982). To prevail on her claims, plaintiff must establish both that (1) Aredia and/or Zometa in fact caused Mr.

Arkon Solutions Inc v. Platinum Chemical Corporation

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 29, 2023

Gamble, Simmons & Co. v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 175 F.3d 762, 773 (10th Cir. 1999). … Burke v. City of Oklahoma City.” Brown v. Elephant Talk N. Am. Corp., No. CIV-18-902-PRW, 2022 WL 1527523, at *3 (W.D. Okla.