Case law

Atwood

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 15, 2026

Mar. 31, 2022) (finding the town board was “fully synonymous with the actions of the Town” and thus the board was not a separate legal entity and could not be sued); Silagyi v. Indep. School Dist. No. 12, Okla. … Here, the Board has no “separate legal identity” from PCUA. Rather, any official action taken by the Board is fully synonymous with actions taken by PCUA.

Madden v. Regional University System

73 F. Supp. 3d 1341 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 24, 2014

Anderson v. … Quoting Bunger v.

Tillett v. Hodel

730 F. Supp. 381 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1990

Co., 480 U.S. at 15-16 , 107 S.Ct. at 976-77 ; National Farmers Union Insurance Cos. v. Crow Tribe, 471 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 2447 , 85 L.Ed.2d 818 (1985). See also, Brown v. … See, Wheeler v. Swimmer, 835 F.2d 259 (10th Cir.1987); Wheeler v. United States Department of Interior, 811 F.2d 549 (10th Cir.1987); Learned v. Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribe, 596 F.Supp. 537 (W.D.Okla.1984); Sahmaunt v.

Pasqualetti v. Johnson

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 9, 2021

out of a detainee’s suicide, Heidel v. … Mar. 23, 2021), citing Cox v.

Simms

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 3, 2026

Ankeney v. Zavaras, 524 F. App'x 454, 458 (10th Cir. 2013) (unpublished). … Servants of Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir. 2000).

Great Western Financial Corp. v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'n

406 F. Supp. 1286 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 30, 1975

Only one name, “Great Western,” was presented to defendant’s board of directors for approval. 18. The “GW” logo was adopted by the President of defendant, Keith Smith, without action by the board of directors. … . § 1114 ; Roto-Rooter Corp. v. O’Neal, 513 F.2d 44 (5th Cir. 1975); Grant Food, Inc. v. Malone & Hyde, Inc., 248 PTCJ A-9 (C.C.P.A. 1975); Boston Pro. Hockey Assn. v.

Planned Parenthood v. Cline

910 F. Supp. 2d 1300 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 24, 2012

See also, Board of County Commissioners v. … See, Hill v.

Tipton v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

92 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1950

This was the law in Oklahoma without any. deviation therefrom until the case of Arnold et al. v. Board of Commissioners of Creek County, 124 Okl. 42 , 254 P. 31, 32 . … As pointed out in Morrissey v. Carter and National Bank of Claremore v.

Simms

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 3, 2026

See Hayes v. Owen, No. 22-CV-00230- CVE-SH, 2023 WL 8543509, at *2 (N.D. Okla. Dec. 11, 2023). … Zbylski v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist., 154 F. Supp. 3d 1146, 1164 (D. Colo. 2015).

Moore v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 7, 2021

Kendrick v. Penske Transp. Servs., Inc., 220 F.3d 1220, 1225 (10th Cir. 2000) (quoting Simms v. Oklahoma ex rel. … Brown submitted an estimate to State Farm of $27,936.04 for replacement of Moore’s roof. As a result of the communication from Mr.

Sherman-Harris-Golson v. Forest Park Police Department

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 1, 2021

Doc. no. 24, ECF p. 5 (citing Brown, 662 F.3d at 1172-73). … Brown, 662 F.3d at 1173.

Simms

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 3, 2026

See Gomez v. … See Robinson v. Missouri Pac. R.

Hughes v. Oklahoma State of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 31, 2022

Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1161 n. 5 (10th Cir. 2011). … Brown’s] constitutional rights.’”) (quoting Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1165 (10th Cir. 2011)) (other quotation omitted).7 4.

Enterprise Management Consultants, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. Hodel

685 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 23, 1988

Barona Group of Capitan Grande Board of Mission Indians v. American Management and Amusement, Inc., 824 F.2d 710 (9th Cir.1987); Wisconsin Winnebago Business Committee v. … Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, 454 U.S. 464 , 102 S.Ct. 752 , 70 L.Ed.2d 700 (1982); Data Processing Service v.

Freeman v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

239 F. Supp. 661 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1965

It is noted that there is apparently no question regarding the plaintiff’s right to choose either to pursue his federal administrative remedy and seek reinstatement and back pay before the Railway Labor Board, or else to … And see Foster v. Atlas Life Ins.

Dean v. United States

150 F. Supp. 541 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1957

United States v. Krueger, 7 Cir., 1935, 77 F.2d 171 . . As mentioned in Halliday v. … Schatz v. Wintersteen, 1949, 201 Okl. 660 , 208 P.2d 1136 ; Brown v. Chaddick, 1946, 197 Okl. 515 , 172 P.2d 996 . . Cf. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation v.

Lesley v. Rankins

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 17, 2023

The Board’s only statutory guidance in the exercise of its discretion is that it act as the public interest requires.” Shirley v. Chestnut, 603 F.2d 805, 807 (10th Cir. 1979). … Petitioner lacks a protected liberty interest in having the Board follow any specific process. Shabazz v. Keating, 977 P.2d 1089, 1093 (Okla. 1999).

Shauf v. Rios

313 F. Supp. 3d 1262 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 2018

Brown v. Budz , 398 F.3d 904 , 913 (7th Cir. 2005). The second requirement is subjective and requires an official's " 'deliberate indifference' to inmate health or safety." … Freeman v. Alex Brown & Sons, Inc. , 73 F.3d 279 , 281 (10th Cir. 1996).

Summers v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

592 F. Supp. 1240 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1984

Rogers v. Douglas Tobacco Board of Trade, 244 F.2d 471 , 483 (5th Cir.1957); RSE, Inc. v. H & M, Inc., 90 F.R.D. 185 (M.D.Pa.1981); Shires v. Magnavox Co., 432 F.Supp. 231, 235 (E.D.Tenn.1976); Vandervelde v. … Bowles v.

Carr v. Andrus

505 F. Supp. 27 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1980

Attocknie v. Udall, 390 F.2d 636 (Tenth Cir. 1968), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 833 , 89 S.Ct. 104 , 21 L.Ed.2d 104 (1968); Heffelman v. … Attocknie v. Udall, supra; Heffelman v. Udall, supra. These authorities appear to fully support the Defendant’s contention and control the controversy now before this Court.