Case law

Griffith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

428 F. Supp. 284 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1976

Cicchetti v. Lucey, 514 F.2d 362 (First Cir. 1975); Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55 (Ninth Cir. 1967); Buck v. New York Cent. R.R., 275 F.2d 292 (Seventh Cir. 1960). … Resident Advisory Board v. Tate, 329 F.Supp. 427 (E.D.Pa.1971); 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c).

Consigned Sales Co. v. Sanders

543 F. Supp. 230 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1982

Brown v. Chote, 411 U.S. 452, 456 , 93 S.Ct. 1732, 1735 , 36 L.Ed.2d 420 (1973); Crowther v. Seaborg, 415 F.2d 437 (10th Cir. 1969). Plaintiffs sell fireworks to Oklahoma consumers directly through the mails. … This reasoning was reaffirmed in Minnesota v.

Continental Oil Co. v. Jones

26 F. Supp. 694 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1939

While the bill of sale was authorized by Continental and accepted by Nevada through the action of its Board of Directors, no meeting of the Board of Directors of Conoco was called to authorize the transfer to it on June 20 … In such instances the substance of the transaction will control the form, and the Board therefore was warranted in considering both form and substance in arriving at its conclusion. United States v.

Charles M. Dunning Const. Co. v. United States

115 F. Supp. 250 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1953

In Howard Industries, Inc. v. … Judge Holtzoff, in Warner Construction Company v.

Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. Cooper

91 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1950

“V. No person shall be a member of this foundation unless: A. He is a trustee, B. Or unless he is elected a member by majority vote of the trustees. … Cooper to the exclusion of its Board of Trustees, but finds it was controlled and operated by its Board. The plaintiff vigorously contends that the evidence conclusively proves that J. H.

United States Ex Rel. Coffey v. William R. Austin Construction Co.

436 F. Supp. 626 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1977

Cassity v. R. J. … Commercial Standard Fire & Marine Company, 450 F.2d 785 (5th Cir. 1971); Skolnick v. Board of Commissioners of Cook County, 435 F.2d 361 (7th Cir. 1970).”

Wehrle v. Office Depot, Inc.

954 F. Supp. 234 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1996

Compare, e.g., Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 88 F.3d 118 (5th Cir.1996) (holding Title VII does not recognize same-sex sexual harassment claims); McWilliams v. … Brown’s Westminster Motors, Inc., 921 F.Supp. 1495 (E.D.Va.1996) (recognizing a claim for same-sex sexual harassment under Title VII); Tanner v.

Balthrop v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 10, 2020

In the case of Black v. … Regarding the Brown v.

Rostykus v. Rostykus

385 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 23, 1974

United States v. Lease, 346 F.2d 696 (Second Cir. 1965); United States v. Strebler, 313 F.2d 402 (Eighth Cir. 1963); United States v. Rindskopf, 105 U.S. 418 , 26 L.Ed. 1131 (1881). … Dillard v. Patterson, 326 F.2d 302 (Fifth Cir. 1963) ; Bloom v. United States, 272 F.2d 215 (Ninth Cir. 1959) ; Flan v. United States, 326 F.2d 356 (Seventh Cir. 1964) .

Darrell Harris, Inc. v. United States

770 F. Supp. 1492 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 7, 1991

Board of Educ. v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 864 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806-07 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654 , 82 S.Ct. 993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962). … In his capacity as president, Harris presided at the regular meetings of the Board of Directors.

Sparks v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.

431 F. Supp. 411 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 13, 1977

It basically provides that the State Commissioner of Health, the Chief Administrative Officer of the State Board of Health, shall have authority to enter into agreements with the Federal Government on matters pertaining to … In addition, County Boards of Health are authorized to cooperate with the State Board of Health in, matters of disease prevention and control (63 Okla.St. 1-201-1-218).

Cantu Services Inc v. Worley

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 19, 2020

Biles v. Harris, 521 P.2d 884, 890 (1974). In Biles v. … Conklin v.

Massey v. City of Oklahoma City

643 F. Supp. 81 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1986

Long v. District of Columbia, 469 F.2d 927 (D.C.Cir.1972); Young v. Board of Educ. of Fremont County School Dist., 416 F.Supp. 1139 (D.Col.1976); Bennun v. Board of Governors of Rutgers, 413 F.Supp. 1274 (D.N.J.1976). … Joseph Township v.

Cary v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

9 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1935

Co. v. *711 State, 23 Okl. 510 , 101 P. 262 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. State, 24 Okl. 370 , 103 P. 617 , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 393; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. … Co. v. City of Bartlesville, 40 Okl. 583 , 139 P. 694 ; City of Poteau v. American Indian Oil & Gas Co., 159 Okl. 240 , 18 P.(2d) 523. The federal courts have followed. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Russell, 261 U.

Coleman v. Court of Appeals, Division Number Two of Oklahoma

550 F. Supp. 681 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1980

See Stump v. Sparkman, supra; Pierson v. Ray, supra; Town of Hopkins v. Cobb, supra; Atchley v. … Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27, 453 F.2d 645 (5th Cir.1972).

Airington v. Lindley

506 F. Supp. 222 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1980

Brown, 456 F.2d 18 (10th Cir. 1972), to be applied retroactively pursuant to Radcliff v. Anderson, 509 F.2d 1093 (10th Cir. 1974), and that for that reason, his conviction in number 76-118 should be reversed. … In Lamb v. Brown, supra, the court held that § 1101(a) violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Subsequently, in Radeliff v.

Fant v. Fisher

414 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1976

Since as an inmate he was receiving free room and board, the only expense of the plaintiff, except for voluntary expenditures for personal items, was $75.00 tuition paid every nine weeks. … Paniagua v. Moseley, 451 F.2d 228, 230 (CA10 1971).

Soderstrand v. OKLAHOMA, EX REL. BD. OF REGENTS

463 F. Supp. 2d 1308 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 22, 2006

SODERSTRAND, PH.D., Plaintiff, v. The State of OKLAHOMA, ex rel. … Adickes v. S.H.

Shultz v. Oklahoma

384 F. Supp. 1259 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 26, 1974

See Wynn v. Page, 369 F.2d 930 (CA10 1966) and Chase v. Page, 343 F.2d 167 (CA10 1965). 2. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). 5. The petitioner intelligently, knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal the judgment and sentence imposed in his case. Hines v.

Independent School District 89 v. Bolain Equipment, Inc.

90 F.R.D. 245 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1980

See Rex v. Owens ex rel. State of Oklahoma, supra; Demarco v. Edens, 390 F.2d 836, 845 (Second Cir. 1968); Williams v. Wohlgemuth, supra; Tuma v. American Can Co., supra; William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. … See, e. g., Barcelo v. Brown, 78 F.R.D. 531, 535 (D.P.R.1978) (class action certification unnecessary where there were approximately 150 potential class members); Aiello v.