Case law

First United Bank Insurance Solutions Inc v. Inservices LLC

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 2, 2023

v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). … See Learning Curve Toys v.

Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Dialite Dial Co.

102 F. Supp. 872 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1951

Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Company, 271 U.S. 23 , 46 S.Ct. 363 , 70 L.Ed. 808 . … Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co., 1894, 151 U.S. 1, 13-15 , 14 S.Ct. 240 , 38 L.Ed. 55 ; Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville R.

Ruhm v. Turner

357 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1973

During the pendency of Plaintiff’s appeal in the State Courts, the United States Court of Appeals for our Circuit on March 16, 1972 decided the case of Lamb v. Brown, 456 F.2d 18 (Tenth Cir. 1972). … In Williams v. United States, supra, the Court refused to apply Chimel v.

Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 12, 2024

Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1163 (10th Cir. 2016). Here, Bridge has graduated from high school since filing this suit. … See United States v.

Duckett v. Allstate Insurance

606 F. Supp. 727 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 7, 1984

Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. State Board for Property and Casualty Rates, 637 P.2d 1251, 1256 (Okl.1981). … Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Ando v. Great Western Sugar Co., 475 F.2d 531 (10th Cir.1973).

Lake v. Carlisle Food Services Products Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 4, 2021

John “Jack” Brown (Brown) was promoted from the position of lean facilitator associate to production supervisor. According to Moon, Brown continued to perform lean initiative activities. … Pippin v. Burlington Resources Oil and Gas Co., 440 F.3d 1186, 1193 (10th Cir. 2006) (quoting Beaird v.

Rudman v. Oklahoma State of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 18, 2022

See, Brown v. State, 23 F.4th 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2022); see also, Doe v. University of Missouri, Case No. 19-cv-04229- NKL, 2022 WL 4043458, at *15 (W.D. Mo. … See, Hiatt v. Colorado Seminary, 858 F.3d 1307, 1315 (10th Cir. 2017) (citing Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, 544 U.S. 167, 183 (2005)).

Davis v. United States

199 F. Supp. 2d 1164 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 25, 2002

On October 15, 1996, plaintiffs appealed this decision to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals in Arlington, Virginia (“Board”), where the appeal was pending at the time the Court issued its original order dismissing this … Harr v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 557 F.2d 747, 749 (10th Cir.1977).

Coleman v. COURT OF APPEALS, DIV. NO. TWO, ETC.

550 F. Supp. 681 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1980

See Stump v. Sparkman, supra ; Pierson v. Ray, supra ; Town of Hopkins v. Cobb, supra ; Atchley v. … Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27, 453 F.2d 645 (5th Cir.1972).

Rose v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

308 F. Supp. 1357 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1970

Wise v. Stockard, 79 F.Supp. 917 (E.D.N.Y.1948); Holstlaw v. Southern Ry. Co., 9 F.R.D. 276 (E.D.Mo.1949); Kuhn v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, 12 F.R.D. 252 (E.D.Mo.1952); Cromer v. … Sollitt Construction Co., 16 F.R.D. 559 (S.D.W.Va.1954); Brown v. Cranston, 132 F.2d 631 , 148 A.L.R. 1178 (Second Cir. 1942), cert. denied, Cranston v. Thompson, 319 U.S. 741 , 63 S.Ct. 1028 , 87 L.Ed. 1698 .

Durham v. Xerox Corp.

846 F. Supp. 939 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1992

Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863, 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982). … See also, Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2510 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986).

Walden v. Elrod

72 F.R.D. 5 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1976

Weisfeld v. … Jannes v. Microwave Communications, Inc., supra. Similarly the demand is excused where the board of directors is subject to the control of the alleged wrongdoers and is hostile to the Plaintiff’s claim. Schreiber v.

Brannon v. Boatmen's Bancshares, Inc.

952 F. Supp. 1478 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1997

Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510 (9th Cir.1996) (same, but adding “(5) causing injury to the plaintiff’s ‘business or property’ ”) (internal citations omitted); McDonald v. Schencker, 18 F.3d 491, 494 (7th Cir.1994). … Board of County Comm’rs v. Liberty Group, 965 F.2d 879 , 884 (10th Cir.1992); Garbade v. Great Divide Mining and Milling Corp., 831 F.2d 212, 213 (10th Cir.1987); Monarch Normandy Square Partners v.

Coats v. United States

405 F. Supp. 1107 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1975

The court has examined the correspondence and it appears that the purpose of his letters is to obtain a judicial ruling on the legality of the latest action of the Youth Corrections Division of the Board of Parole on July … Rivera v. Toft, 477 F.2d 534 (C.A.10 1973).

Fabian v. IND. SCH. DIST. NO. 89 OF OKL. CTY., OKL.

409 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1976

Newmon v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 374 F.Supp. 238 (N.D. Ga.1973). 8. The deliberate policy of defendants resulting in economic loss to plaintiffs properly gives rise to an award of back pay. Robinson v. … Assn. v. Board of Ed., Portland, Ark. Sch. Dist., 446 F.2d 763 (C.A.8, 1971). *101 9. Permanent injunctive relief is inappropriate, as the defendants no longer utilize the condemned policy. 10.

In re Oklahoma Ry. Co.

61 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1945

“Whereas, the board of directors of the Railway Company, at a meeting of said board duly convened and held on the 10th day of April, A. … In Dugan et al. v.

Vieser v. Harvey Estes Construction Co.

69 F.R.D. 378 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1975

Co. v. … The same result was reached in Ward v. Brown, 301 F.2d 445 (10 Cir. 1962). In the event new issues are raised, the right to a jury trial is only revived as to the new issues. Williams v.

Combs

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 13, 2026

.; see also Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350-51 (1999). “Effectuation of service is a precondition to suit . . . .” Jenkins v. … P. 4(m); 28 U.S.C. § 1448; Wallace v. Microsoft Corp., 596 F.3d 703, 706-07 (10th Cir. 2010). The Board argues that dismissal is warranted because the Board has still not been properly served.

Olupitan

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 14, 2026

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma; Michael J. … Davis v. Kan. Dep’t of Corr., 507 F.3d 1246, 1248 (10th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Cashner v.

Olupitan

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 14, 2026

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma; Michael J. … Davis v. Kan. Dep’t of Corr., 507 F.3d 1246, 1248 (10th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Cashner v.