Case law

Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Hardin

404 F. Supp. 961 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1974

It seems that the owners of the company merely agreed on the plan as controlling Board Members. The initial efforts to get $1,000,000.00 in life insurance for each Brewer and Stephens and $500,000.00 for Hardin failed. … Marshall v. Amos, 471 P.2d 896 at 905 (Okl.1970). The burden of proof is on one who seeks to establish a constructive trust. Johnson v. Rowe, 185 Okl. 60 , 89 P.2d 955 (1939). In State of Ohio v.

Grace v. United Founders Life Insurance

53 F.R.D. 8 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1971

An analogous case is Brown v. First Nat. Bank of Wewoka, Okl., 14 F.R.D. 339 (D.C.Okl.1953). . Redmond’s assertion that he proceeds against Plaintiff under Rule 13(b), F.R. Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. is without merit.

Martina O. Olupitan, MHA v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma et al.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 26, 2026

See Olupitan v. Okla. ex rel. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Okla., No. CIV-24-349-G, 2025 WL 1 Defendants are: State of Oklahoma ex rel. The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma; Michael J. … Am. v. Matrix Serv., Inc., 426 F.3d 1281, 1290 (10th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Coca-Cola Company v. Cahill

350 F. Supp. 1231 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1972

Defendant Triple “AAA” Company was recently denied an application to register “Tacóla” by the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The Plaintiff opposed such application. Coca-Cola Company v. … In such denial the Appeal Board in a majority opinion said, “Notwithstanding that we do not find actual confusion, it is our opinion that there is here a likelihood of confusion.”

Melton v. University of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2021

Board of County Commissioners, 952 P.2d 492 (Okla. 1997). … Grillot v. Oklahoma ex rel. University of Oklahoma Board of Regents, No. 19-241, 2019 WL 3558183 (W.D. Okla. Aug. 5, 2019), at *3-4 (Friot, J.). The Court agrees with this explanation.

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Conner

871 F. Supp. 1424 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1993

Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District, 464 P.2d 748, 755 (Okla.1968). … Bradford Securities Processing Services, Inc. v.

Moss v. Burkhart

220 F. Supp. 149 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1963

Article V, Section 9(a). … See: WMCA, Inc. v. Simon, 374 U.S. 802 , 83 S.Ct. 1691 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1028 ; Wesberry v. Sanders, 374 U.S. 802 , 83 S.Ct. 1691 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1029 ; Reynolds v. Sims, 374 U.S. 802 . 83 S.Ct. 1692 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1029 ; Vann v.

Cantu Services Inc v. Worley

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 12, 2021

After Cantu served its subpoena duces tecum on Brown, Brown then produced the requested materials for in camera review on July 7, 2021. … No. 110, pp. 10—11 (citing Motley v. Marathon Oil Co., 71 F.3d 1547, 1551 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing White v. American Airlines, Inc., 915 F.2d 1414, 1424 (10th Cir. 1990))).

Easter v. Independent School District No 103 of Lincoln County Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 28, 2024

Plaintiff does not plead any facts related to actions taken by the board, however. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Plaintiff does not identify either a formal regulation or policy, nor a final decision by a policymaker.

Ingram v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2022

Brown argued that “the isolated incident of drifting left of center, unaccompanied by other driving irregularities,” is not a traffic violation under Oklahoma City ordinances. Suppl. R. Vol. V at 5. … V at 8 (quoting Okla. City Mun. Code ch. 32, art. V § 32-191(b) (1980)).

Berry v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 7, 2024

Banks v. Reynolds, 54 F.3d 1508, 1515 (10th Cir. 1995); see also Smith v. … Brown in this regard. See United States v.

Forbis v. Educators Automobile Insurance

239 F. Supp. 667 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1965

And the case of Wheeler v. Hartford Life Ins. … Co. v. Johnston & Harder, Inc., 348 Pa. 512 , 35 A.2d 721 , which holds that basis for assessment of damages would be agent’s loss of profits on business he could write during the notice period. Also, see Foster v.

Ledford v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

318 F. Supp. 1333 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1970

Co., Limited of Edinburgh, Scotland v. Rice, 193 Okl. 418 , 144 P.2d 953 (1944) and Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Board of Education, 201 Okl. 250 , 204 P.2d 982 (1949). … Co. v. Cooksey, 285 P.2d 223 (Okl. 1955).

Marcum v. Dahl

535 F. Supp. 48 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1981

Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Schmidt v. … Gonzales v. Fairfax-Brewster School, Inc., 569 F.2d 1294 (Fourth Cir. 1978).

Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority

320 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1970

Urban Development Act of 1961 for cities of 10,000 or less) provide that before the exercise of the authority or powers of the Urban Renewal Authority, the approval thereof shall be by resolution of the local governing board … City of Kansas City v. Robb, 183 Kan. 834 , 332 P.2d 520 (1958); Isaacs v. Oklahoma City, 437 P.2d 229, at p. 236 , (Okl.1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 825 , 19 L.Ed.2d 79 , 88 S.Ct. 63 (1967). Also see Kramer v.

R v. Fallin

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2019

Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 278 (1986). Here, Both Governor Stitt and Mr. Brown have been sued in their official capacities. … v.

Kyle v. Jones

92 F. Supp. 600 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1950

The company furnished its workers board and room in a type of barracks. … (Citing Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.

Montemayor v. Martin

645 F. Supp. 917 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1986

The conspiracy in which petitioner participated, along with several of his brothers, was one of the five largest “Mexican brown” heroin distribution rings in the western hemisphere. … Brest v. Ciccone, 371 F.2d 981, 982-983 (8th Cir.1967). See also Baker v. Day, 436 F.Supp. 593 (W.D.Okla.1977).

General Mfg. Corp. v. Gray

48 F.2d 602 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1931

In Brown v. Piper, 91 U. S. 37 , at page 41, 23 L. Ed. 200 , is found the following language: “There is another view of the ease that may properly be taken. … these projectors are not arranged to project the ball diagonally or in other words in the general direction of the opponent’s goal but diagonally across the field nor is there a projector arranged on the median line of the board

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education

87 F. Supp. 526 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1948

Hague v. C. I. O., 307 U.S. 496, 514 , 59 S.Ct. 954 , 83 L.Ed. 1423 ; Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157 , 63 S.Ct. 877 , 87 L.Ed. 1324 . … Sipuel v. Board of Regents, 332 U.S. 631 , 68 S.Ct. 299 , 92 L.Ed. 247 ; Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337 , 59 S.Ct. 232 , 83 L.Ed. 208 .