Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokwd

1,782 results

1.08s

  • Finch v. United States

    263 F. Supp. 309 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1967

    United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 767 , 85 L.Ed. 1058 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Burgess v. Bryant

    505 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 6, 1980

    Crosswhite v. Brown, 424 F.2d 495 (Tenth Cir. 1970); Wright v. St John’s Hospital, 414 F.Supp. 1202 (N.D.Okla.1976); Seibert v. McCracken, 387 F.Supp. 275 (E.D. Okla.1974). … See Crosswhite v. Brown, supra; Seibert v. McCracken, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • DeFries v. Town of Washington, Okl.

    875 F. Supp. 756 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1995

    Carnes v. Parker, 922 F.2d 1506, 1510 (10th Cir.1991). In Cleveland Board of Educ. v. … In Young v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Trant v. Oklahoma

    874 F. Supp. 2d 1294 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 19, 2012

    Even if this immunity extended to the Board’s action, it would not apply to conduct that is simply an administrative employment decision. Bogan v. … See Canary v. Osborn, 211 F.3d 324, 329 (6th Cir.2000) (declining to extend immunity to school board’s employment renewal decisions).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Velharticky v. Independent School District No. 3 of Roger Mills County

    846 F. Supp. 941 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 17, 1993

    In Hicks v. … In Harlow v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Shepherd Mall State Bank

    324 F. Supp. 1029 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1971

    See Mid-Eastern Electronics Inc., v. First National Bank, 380 F.2d 355 , (4 C.A. 1967); American Card Company v. H. M. H. Company, 97 R.I. 59 , 196 A.2d 150 ; Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. … A more pertinent case involving a trustee in bankruptcy in a situation in pre-code law similar to the present case is Brown v. Camp, 275 F. 612, 613 , in which the Fifth Circuit said: “John E.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Zwingle v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.

    241 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1965

    People’s Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co., 246 U.S. 79 , 38 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed. 587 ; Mebco Realty Holding Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, (D.C.N.J., 1942), 45 F.Supp. 340 ; Lawlor v. … The test appears to be set out in United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re Sandridge Energy, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation

    302 F.R.D. 628 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 22, 2014

    Kahn v. … [were] a product of the Board’s valid exercise of its business judgment.” Pfeiffer v. Leedle, 2013 WL 5988416 *4 (Del. Ch.2013).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Oklahoma State of

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 14, 2024

    See Morganroth & Morganroth v. DeLorean, 213 F.3d 1301, 1313 (10th Cir. 2000); see also Brown v. Presbyterian Healthcare Serv., 101 F.3d 1324, 1332 (10th Cir. 1996). … In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Erwin first recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against the Oklahoma County Board of Commissioners because he “alleged no custom or policy attributable to the Board

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smith v. Griffith

    437 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 4, 1977

    Plaintiffs assert that notwithstanding the rulings in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Perry v. … In Summers v. Civis, supra, notice and hearing was claimed pursuant to standards of the North Central Association of College and Secondary Schools adopted by the Board of Education, 3 and in Singleterry v. Ind. Sch.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Harth

    280 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1968

    In Ekberg v. … In United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Meyers v. Keeler

    414 F. Supp. 935 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 3, 1976

    He cites several cases to include deHass v. … In Brody v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Amoco Pipeline Co. v. Montgomery

    487 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1980

    See, White v. B. K. Trucking Co., Inc., 405 F.Supp. 1068, 1069-1070 (W.D.Okl. 1975); Sunray DX Oil Company v. Brown, 477 P.2d 67, 70 (Okl.1970); Wootan v. Shaw, 205 Okl. 283 , 237 P.2d 442, 444 (1951). … See, Danculovich v. Brown, supra, 593 P.2d at 194 n.10; Woods, supra, at 14.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Bryson v. MacY

    611 F. Supp. 2d 1234 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 30, 2009

    Brown v. Gray, 227 F.3d 1278 , 1290 & n. 7 (10th Cir.2000); Houston v. Reich, 932 F.2d 883 (10th Cir. 1991). G. … In Brown v. Hartshorne Pub. Sch. Dist. # I, 926 F.2d 959, 962 (10th Cir.1991), the Tenth Circuit concluded that Oklahoma’s savings provision applies to a § 1983 claim. 10 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • TA’VION MURPHY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE OKLAHOMA COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE AUTHORITY, et al.

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 20, 2026

    CIV-25-1556-SLP ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE ) OKLAHOMA COUNTY CRIMINAL ) … See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Oklahoma Bankers Ass'n v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n

    625 F. Supp. 993 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1984

    As this Court determined in granting summary judgment in favor of the Bank Board in Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Empie, CIV-83-500-W (W.D.Okla. … Id. at 116 , 57 S.Ct. at 99 (citations omitted); e.g., Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 12 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2848 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Furrow & Co. v. American Airlines, Inc.

    102 F. Supp. 808 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1952

    Jones v. Northwest Airlines, 1945, 22 Wash.2d 863 , 157 P.2d 728 ; Lichten v. Eastern Air Lines, D. C., 87 F.Supp. 691 ; Mack v. Eastern Air Lines, D.C., 87 F.Supp. 113 . … Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros., 1921, 256 U.S. 566 , 41 S.Ct. 584 , 65 L.Ed. 1094 ; Boston & Maine R. R. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. Guthrie Independent School District No. I-1

    942 F. Supp. 511 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1996

    In light of existing OHahoma law, the Court finds Plaintiffs’ reliance on School Board, District No. 18 of Garvin County v. … Mozert v. Hawkins County Board of Education, 827 F.2d 1058, 1066 (6th Cir.1987). That is not the situation before this Court.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Coyle Public Schools

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 10, 2021

    Brown v. Ent. Merchants Ass'n, 564 U.S. 786, 794 (2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). … Apache Tribe of Oklahoma v. Brown, 966 F. Supp. 2d 1188, 1197–98 (W.D. Okla. 2013) (quoting Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc., 556 U.S. 635, 639–40 (2009)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Draper v. Phelps

    351 F. Supp. 677 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1972

    In Green v. … Green v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.