Case law

Chapman v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 30, 2021

United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1, 12 n. 27 (1970). … Berreth v. Frazee, No. 19-CV- 00027-PAB-KMT, 2019 WL 10250759, at *2 (D. Colo. Apr. 1, 2019); Hilda M. v. Brown, No. 10-CV-02495-PAB-KMT, 2010 WL 5313755, at *3 (D. Colo.

City of Clinton, ex rel. Schuetter v. First Nat. Bank

39 F. Supp. 909 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1941

See Board of Com’rs of Greer County v. Clarke & Courts, 12 Okl. 197 , 70 P. 206 . The Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, in Board of County Com’rs v. … In Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v.

Spray v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 27, 2021

See Self v. Crum, 439 F.3d 1227, 1230-31 (10th Cir. 2006). Defendant concedes that Ms. Spray’s duodenal ulcer was a serious medical condition. … However, in Barrios v.

Chapman v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 26, 2021

See Jojola v. … Nail v.

Rohde v. University of Central Oklahoma Board of Regents

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 26, 2021

THE _ ) BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE ) UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ) OKLAHOMA, a/k/a THE ) UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ) OKLAHOMA … See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT.

Chapman v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 21, 2020

See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); Predator Int’l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180–81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007). … IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Board’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3], Taylor’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4], and Hedderman’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc.

Norberg v. Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 30, 2020

Gobbo Farms & Orchards v. Poole Chemical Co., 81 F.3d 122, 123 (10th Cir. 1996). Instead, amendment via Rule 15 is the proper procedure for voluntarily dismissing some, but not all, claims. See Gronholz v. … Cir. 1987) (treating a dismissal, purportedly brought under Rule 41, of a single claim as an amendment of the complaint); Klay v.

Bowens v. Board of County Commissioners of Custer County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 1, 2020

In Purvey v. … See Bd. of County Comm’rs of Bryant County, Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). Rather, there must be proof of a policy or custom that is the cause of the constitutional violation.

Bowens v. Board of County Commissioners of Custer County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 2, 2020

Defendant Board argues this claim should be dismissed based on the law set forth by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Bosh v. Cherokee Building Authority, 2013 OK 9, 305 P.3d 994. … Defendant Board argues that Bosh stands for the proposition that the only permissible claim under § 30 is one for excessive force. Defendant Board also references Barrios v.

Cox v. Board of County Commissioners of Kingfisher County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 2, 2020

CIV-20-104-SLP ) BOARD OF COUNTY ) COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY ) … See, e.g., Allen v. Town of Colcord, Okla., 874 F. Supp. 2d 1276, 1290-91 (N.D. Okla. 2012) (setting forth elements).

United States v. Mendonca

412 F. Supp. 613 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1976

Brown had no prior knowledge of the search warrant before he gave his free and voluntary consent to search the premises. See Leeper v. … White v. United States, 444 F.2d 724 (Tenth Cir. 1971); United States v. Wixom, 441 F.2d 623 (Seventh Cir. 1971); United States v. Hughes, 441 F.2d 12 (Fifth Cir. 1971); United States v.

Graves v. McElderry

946 F. Supp. 1569 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 3, 1996

Rosen v. Brown, 970 F.2d 169, 175 (6th Cir.1992) (quoting, Bachrach v. Secretary of Commonwealth, 382 Mass. 268 , 415 N.E.2d 832, 834 (1981)). … See Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 , 112 S.Ct. 2059 , 119 L.Ed.2d 245 (1992); Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); McDonald v.

Olupitan v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 1, 2025

Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1161 n.9 (10th Cir. 2016). … “Faculty members of the Board will be chosen by the faculty of the college for a three-year term,” and “student members of the Board will be appointed for a term of one year by the dean of the college, upon recommendation

Olupitan v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2025

Foltz v. Columbia Cas. Co., No. CIV-15-1144-D, 2016 WL 4734687, at *2 (W.D. Okla. Sept. 9, 2016) (citing Weeks v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. I-89 of Okla. Cnty., 230 F.3d 1201, 1211 (10th Cir. 2000)); accord Cole v. … Bell v. City of Okla. City, No. CIV-16-1084, 2017 WL 3219489, at *2 (W.D. Okla. July 28, 2017) (quoting Macheca Transp. Co. v. Phila. Indem. Ins.

Brashear v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 5, 2019

Id. at ¶ 4.5 The allegation that the board is responsible for the Oklahoma County Jail is incorrect as a matter of law. Meade v. … In Jantzen v.

Payne v. WS Services, LLC

216 F. Supp. 3d 1304 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 25, 2016

Smith v. Berks Cmty. Television, 657 F.Supp. 794, 795 (E.D. Pa. 1987). Her wearing of the sandwich board certainly did not hasten that process. … Essentially, any interpretation of the sandwich board that WSS discriminated “had to come in the form of insinuation from the language.” Krebsbach v. Henley, 725 P.2d 852, 856 (Okla. 1986).

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. A & D Brown Enterprises Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 3, 2021

Louis Baptist Temple v. Fed. Deposit Ins. … Co. v.

Gerks v. Deathe

832 F. Supp. 1450 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1993

Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863, 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 *1453 (1982). … See Katzer v. Baldor Electric Co., 969 F.2d 935 (10th Cir. 1992); Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74 (Okla. 1986).

DeMarsh v. Payzant

550 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 12, 1981

Morrison v. Morrison, supra; Wright, supra; see Popple v. United States, supra. … In this connection, it has been held that a United States District Court is not a plenary reviewing body for a school board’s administrative actions, and this Court therefore will not displace the judgment of the Defendants

Daniels v. Board of Regents for the University of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 10, 2023

) ) THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE ) UNIVERSITY … See Jojola v.