Case law

Zhang

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 22, 2026

Petitioner’s appeal is pending before the Board of Immigration Appeals, so this provision does not apply to him. B. Section 1226 governs Petitioner’s detention. … See, e.g., Cunha v.

Abalos

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2026

An immigration judge’s decision to detain may be further appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Id. § 236.1(d)(3). … See Moore v.

Kumar

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 27, 2026

However, on July 29, 2026, Petitioner appealed the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the appeal is currently pending. Id. … McCleskey v.

Zhang

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 16, 2026

Dragomirescu v. U.S. … See United States v.

Hice v. Turn Key Health Clinics LLC

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 3, 2024

Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). 1 “[T]o establish municipal liability, a plaintiff must first demonstrate a ‘municipal policy or custom,’ which may take one of the following forms: ‘(1) a formal regulation or policy

Lott v. Oklahoma City City of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 28, 2022

Aug. 24, 2021) (citing Henning v. Union Pac. R. Co., 530 F.3d 1206, 1217 (10th Cir. 2008)). 8 United States v. … Co., 827 F.3d 1256, 1266 (10th Cir. 2016)); see also Brown v. Elephant Talk North America Corp., 2021 WL 5919366, at *1 (W.D. Okla. Oct. 7, 2021). 12 Robinson v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, 365 F.

Quintana-Torres

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 6, 2026

However, Petitioner has until August 3, 2026, to appeal the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Therefore, the removal order is not yet final under 8 C.F.R. … Soberanes v. Comfort, 388 F.3d 1305, 1310 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687-88 (2001)). IV.

Aldens, Inc. v. Ryan

454 F. Supp. 465 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1976

Compare Gallagher v. … Aldens’ standard credit agreement complies with Regulation Z as promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board pursuant to the Federal Truth in Lending Act.

Hartman v. United States

923 F. Supp. 2d 1287 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 8, 2013

Co., Ltd. v. … Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 , 102 S.Ct. 2799 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982).

Lewis v. Edmond City of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 6, 2021

Brown v. Gray, 227 F.3d 1278, 1286 (10th Cir. 2000) (quoting Allen v. Muskogee, 119 F.3d 837, 841-42 (10th Cir. 1997) (citing City of Canton, 489 U.S. 378, 389–91 (1989))). … Brown v. Gray, 227 F.3d 1278, 1288 (10th Cir. 2000) (citing Allen, 119 F.3d at 842)); see also Simpson v. Little, 500 F. Supp. 3d 1255, 1267 (N.D.

Farrow v. Weatherford City of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 26, 2025

Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1163 (10th Cir. 2011). of equal protection “by their hostile and disparate treatment of Plaintiff, retaliation, and constructive discharge based on his sexual orientation”); [Doc. … See Ellis v.

Whitson

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2026

See Dutcher v. Matheson, 733 F.3d 980, 988 (10th Cir. 2013). … Co. v. Brown, 107 P.3d 609, 613 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). “A duty to speak may arise from partial disclosure.” Uptegraft v.

Merrick

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2026

See Dutcher v. Matheson, 733 F.3d 980, 988 (10th Cir. 2013). … Co. v. Brown, 107 P.3d 609, 613 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). “A duty to speak may arise from partial disclosure.” Uptegraft v.

Martin v. Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 23, 2024

Thrifty Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc. v. … V.

Baker v. Puckett

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 13, 2022

Id (citing Deposit Bank of Frankfort v. Board of Councilmen of City of Frankfort, 191 U.S. 499 (1903)); see also Collins v. D.R. … Sch. of Law at Andover, Inc. v. Am.

Inter Insurance Agency Services Ltd. v. Insurance Department of the State of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 15, 2024

Co. v. … Software, Inc. v. RTV, Inc., 377 F.

Turner

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2026

See Dutcher v. Matheson, 733 F.3d 980, 988 (10th Cir. 2013). … Co. v. Brown, 107 P.3d 609, 613 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). “A duty to speak may arise from partial disclosure.” Uptegraft v.

Nguyen

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2026

See Dutcher v. Matheson, 733 F.3d 980, 988 (10th Cir. 2013). … Co. v. Brown, 107 P.3d 609, 613 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). “A duty to speak may arise from partial disclosure.” Uptegraft v.

Salaises v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 7, 2024

Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of Wichita, 226 F.3d 1138, 1160 (10th Cir. 2000). The court applies the same standards under either rule. Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1160 n. 4 (10th Cir. 2011). … See generally, Christian v. Am. Home Assur.

Bonilla v. Gerlach

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 2, 2025

Turner v. Pub. Serv. Co. of Colorado, 563 F.3d 1136, 1149 (10th Cir. 2009) (quotation marks omitted). … Zbylski v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist., 154 F. Supp. 3d 1146, 1163 (D. Colo. 2015).