Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
884 results
1.77s
World Pub. Co. v. United States
72 F. Supp. 886 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 16, 1947
Helvering v. National Grocery Co., supra; Helvering v. Chicago Stock Yards Co., supra; and see Universal Steel Co. v. Commissioner, 5 T.C. 627 ; Southland Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner, 7 T.C. 1488 ; Semagraph Co. v. … the war, a program of this nature could not be effectuated until after cessation of hostilities, and for that reason the financial welfare of the Company can only be protected in the most effective way by an action of the Board
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 8, 2023
District of Columbia v. Wesby, 138 S. Ct. 577, 589 (2018) (quoting Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 341 (1986)). … Hinkle v. Beckham Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Com’rs., 962 F.3d 1204, 1241 (10th Cir. 2020) (quoting Board of Cnt. Com’rs. Of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 (1997)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown295 F. Supp. 3d 1221 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 13, 2018
Comm'rs v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 404, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) ). A municipality cannot be liable under § 1983 solely because its employee caused injury or damage. See Graves v. … (citing Brown v. State , 989 P.2d 913 (Okla. Crim. App. 1998) and Humphreys v. State , 947 P.2d 565 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997) ).
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 28, 2025
Berry v. Oklahoma, 495 F. App’x 920, 921 (10th Cir. 2012);3 accord Callahan v. Poppell, 471 F.3d 1155, 1159 (10th Cir. 2006). … Brown v. City of Tulsa, 124 F.4th 1251, 1264 (10th Cir. 2025) (citing Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690, 694 (1978)). state a plausible claim. See Dkt.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLutheran Church of the Good Shepherd v. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 25, 2024
The board was also unlikely to have any insulating properties and it was not installed for the purpose of insulation, and the actual insulation was protected by the TPO membrane, the cover board, and the older roof membrane … Broom v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 21, 2022
(Exhibit 19, RCSO Use of Force Review Board). III. ANALYSIS A. … See Coronado v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown724 F. Supp. 2d 1159 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 2, 2010
But see Sotheby’s, Inc. v. … See White v.
Cited 25 timesPublished231 B.R. 809 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1997
Snap-On Tools, Inc. v. Freeman, 956 F.2d 252 , 255 (11th Cir.1992); Enterprise Energy Corp. v. … For a discussion of the constitutionality of § 363(m)'s stay requirement, see See More Light Investments v. Brown, 25 B.R. 1005, 1008-1009 (D.Mass.1982). 6 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedHajoca Corporation v. R&R Plumbing, LLC
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 1, 2024
See Tripodi v. … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Ops., S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 22, 2023
Flora observed that S.R.’s “chest was congested” and noted that S.R. discharged “brown- greenish kind of mucus” when he was intubated. Id. at 53 [350]. … Roland Auer, a board-certified neuropathologist. Dkt. # 2, at 16-20; Dkt. # 31.14 In his report, Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 11, 2025
See Brown v. Eppler, 725 F.3d 1221, 1230-31 (10th Cir. 2013) (noting that authorization to proceed in forma pauperis only excuses prepayment of the filing fee). … Zimomra v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 7, 2021
See, i.e., Hayes v. … .”); Tamos v. Aurora Loan Servs., 2010 WL 966856, at *1 (S.D. Fla.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 6, 2024
(alteration in original) (quoting Brown v. Davenport, 596 U.S. 118, 134 (2022)). … See Smith v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 16, 2025
See Brown v. Eppler, 725 F.3d 1221, 1230-31 (10th Cir. 2013) (noting that authorization to proceed in forma pauperis only excuses prepayment of the filing fee). … See Goldlawr, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 21, 2022
Bryson v. Oklahoma City, 627 F.3d 784, 788 (10th Cir. 2010) (quoting Brammer-Hoelter v. … Martinez v. Winner, 771 F.2d 424, 444 (10th Cir. 1985); Brown v. Las Cruces Police Dep’t, 347 F. Supp. 3d 792, 811 (D.N.M. 2018); Stump v. Gates, 777 F. Supp. 808, 815-16 (D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownOklahoma Digital Abstract, LLC v. Imersion Global, Incorporated
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 19, 2019
To date, neither of ODA’s abstract plants have been certified by the Oklahoma Abstractor’s Board. … See also Weyerhaeuser Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownStewart v. Social Security Administration
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 22, 2023
Brown v. Berryhill, No. 17-cv-00556-GKF-GBC, 2019 WL 2488730, at *6 (N.D. Okla. Mar. 11, 2019). … See, e.g., Kenneth R.C. v. Saul, No. 19-CV-255-FHM, 2020 WL 3249977, at *2-*3 (N.D. Okla. June 16, 2020); Brown, 2019 WL 2488730, at *6; Carolyn Y. v. Berryhill, No. 17-CV-286-GKF-FHM, 2018 WL 5660752, at *3-*6 (N.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownT.D. Williamson, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 25, 2021
Co. v. Beaty, 455 P.2d 684, 688 (Okla. 1969). … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 7, 2025
Hail v. … See Gibson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 2026
Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). An amendment is futile when the amended complaint “would be subject to dismissal” under Rule 12(b)(6). Mountain View Pharmacy v. … Davis is a member of MESTA’s board of trustees and is thus covered by the plain language of Okla. Stat. tit. 60, § 179. /d. On its own, this bars Mr. Barnes’s claim for relief against Mr. Davis.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna