Case law

Smith v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 27, 2023

Standard of Review The Social Security Act (Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. … The hypothetical questions should reflect the specific capacity/limitations established by the record as a whole.

Latham v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2023

Standard of Review The Social Security Act (the Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability … Additionally, the plaintiff’s brief confusingly combines its discussion of the plaintiff’s physical complaints with her mental limitations, often without clearly explaining how the plaintiff is more limited than

Vida v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 23, 2021

Agency Proceedings The Social Security Act (the Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. … (“Clearly, an ALJ doesn’t commit error by omitting limitations not supported by the record”); Arles v. Astrue, 438 Fed. App’x 735, 740 (10th Cir. 2011).

Jennings v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2022

Standard of Review The Social Security Act (the Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability … She also stated she has not started physical therapy yet, but clearly it has been recommended, as discussed below[.

Terry v. Bear

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 23, 2019

To demonstrate “cause,” the prisoner must “show that some objective factor external to the 11 As used in § 2254(d)(1), the phrase “clearly established Federal law” means “the governing legal principle or principles” … Petitioner does not clearly identify which part of Detective Morris’s testimony Petitioner believes qualifies as inadmissible “testimonial” hearsay under Crawford.

Cresap v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 2, 2022

Colvin, 727 F.3d 1061, 1074 (10th Cir. 2013) (“The Commissioner need not establish that a prior job exists in significant numbers in the national economy. . . .”). … Plaintiff’s Job as a Housekeeping Cleaner Qualifies as Past Relevant Work.

Lillard v. Stockton

267 F. Supp. 2d 1081 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 16, 2003

In the agreement, Plaintiffs warranted that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Regulation D in the 1933 Act; that they were qualified purchasers, defined by the Investment Company Act; and that they met all suitability … At this stage of the proceedings, no facts have been established for the record.

Richter v. Nelson

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 17, 2024

Hatfield, Pitts, Lowery, and other named defendants opposed the amendment, arguing that OKDHS could not be added as a party because it was immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. … CONCLUSION Plaintiff’s arguments pursuant to both Rule 59 and Rule 60 fail to establish a basis for relief.

Thomas L Pearson and the Pearson Family Members Foundation, The v. University of Chicago, The

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2023

Accordingly, the court denies the University’s motion with respect to Plaintiffs’ claim that the University breached the Grant Agreement by failing to hire qualified faculty. 2. … These uncontroverted material facts establish that the University complied with its obligation under Article 3 of the Grant Agreement to appoint a qualified Institute Director prior to September 1, 2016.

Royer v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2023

Standard of Review The Social Security Act (Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. … Although portions of the plaintiffs argument are poorly organized and sparse in citation to the well-established legal requirements that apply, the plaintiff's brief clearly sets forth an argument that the

Irving v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 16, 2023

Standard of Review The Social Security Act (the Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. … At step two, the claimant must establish an impairment or combination of impairments that is severe. See Lax, 489 F.3d at 1084.

Ball v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2022

Standard of Review The Social Security Act (the Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability … Thus, the period between plaintiff’s alleged December 31, 2011 onset date and her DLI establishes a one-day relevant period by which plaintiff must establish disability. (See R. 16-17).

Sanders v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.

676 F. Supp. 2d 1271 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 28, 2009

. # 359, at 18 (Corporate HR established the guidelines and communicated those to the local business units). McNeely described the MSGs as “overarching guidelines” for the Fall 2002 RIF. … Wooten also testified that he told Sanders that she might be able to return to C & E in the future if a position for which she was qualified opened up. 16 Id. *1288 110.

Cowan v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 5, 2024

Standard of Review The Social Security Act (Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. … Under agency regulations, the ALJ’s decision must give “specific reasons for the weight given to the individual’s symptoms, be consistent with and supported by the evidence, and be clearly articulated so the

United States v. Osage Wind, LLC

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 18, 2024

To establish an entitlement to treble damages, a Plaintiff must demonstrate ejectment through an active force by the trespasser. Ansay, 450 F.2d at 436. … At the time of negotiating the Surface Leases, Defendants clearly believed that the wind farm could be removed from the surface estate within 12 months.

Tilley

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 25, 2026

Id. ¶ 54.2 Plaintiff also alleges that Wahlgren acted “in conformity with and pursuant to the practices and policies established by [defendant], both through [defendant’s] own example . . . and in conformance with the established … The fact that plaintiff’s legs were immobile is not clearly a result of any injury, rather than the simple fact that he was restrained.

Ni Fuel Co., Inc. v. Jackson

257 B.R. 600 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 1, 2000

Each case clearly involves some claims which are not core and not related to the bankruptcy. … In addition, the remaining claims do not appear to qualify as “arising in” a bankruptcy case because the causes of action can exist outside of the bankruptcy action. 16 .

Coats v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 11, 2019

The Campos court concluded that it would consider Plaintiff to have met the full-time requirement if she can provide a reasonable calculation method establishing that she worked in excess of 30 hours in any “regular work … Moreover, Krueger’s response to Wright’s June 2, 2015, inquiry clearly stated that Plaintiff’s hourly rate was “$52.7361 hourly, plus a separate night shift differential rate of $5.00 hourly for hours worked between 1900

Anderson v. Boeing Co.

222 F.R.D. 521 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 29, 2004

Rule 702 provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience … Boeing also argues that Siskin’s analyses do not speak “clearly and directly to an issue in dispute in the ease.” Id. at 6, citing Daubert v.

Winfrey v. Nunn

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 9, 2024

2004-4372 is Indian; (6) that he has “a significant blood quantum of 91% African aboriginal”; (7) that he has “full equity in tandem with members of the Five Tribes as long as American Indians have the right privilege or immunity … the extent the state district court’s determination that Winfrey is not Indian constitutes a factual finding, Winfrey’s allegations that he is a Chickasaw Freedman or a descendant of Chickasaw or Creek Freedmen do not clearly