Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
884 results
0.95s
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 15, 2025
When Shaver and Farar-Brown urged July and Proctor to stop beating Ashlock, July accused Farar-Brown of being a snitch and struck Farar-Brown in the eye with a gun or a fist. … See Brown v. Davenport, 596 U.S. 118, 134 (2022) (“While AEDPA announced certain new conditions to relief, it did not guarantee relief upon their satisfaction.”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 31, 2023
Mengert walked into the private screening room with Morroney and Whitney Brown, another TSA employee, and either Morroney or Brown closed the door to the screening room. Dkt. # 51-2, at 9. … Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250 (1986); Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir. 1993).
Cited 0 timesUnknown766 F. Supp. 1018 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1991
Baker v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 903 F.2d 1342 (10th Cir.1990); Guinn v. Church of Christ of Collinsville, 775 P.2d 766 (Okla.1989); Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74 (Okla.1986); Williams v. … Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74 (Okla.1986); Williams v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., 688 P.2d 1294 (Okla.1984); Breeden v. League Services Corp., 575 P.2d 1374 (Okla.1978); Floyd v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 17, 2026
KANE; LOUISE KANE ROARK; ANN KANE SEIDMAN; MARK KANE; PAMELA BROWN; GARY BROWN, Consolidated Defendants. … But an eighty-percent across-the- board reduction would be excessive.
Cited 0 timesUnknown779 F. Supp. 2d 1283 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 15, 2011
Calhoun v. … See Eames v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Cities Service Oil Co.
277 F. Supp. 665 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1967
The Union has cited the holding of United Steelworkers of America v. … The parties agreed to be bound by the National Labor Relations Board determination of this issue, which was made. Both sides are bound by this decision and the dispute is resolved. In United States Gypsum Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSanders v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.
676 F. Supp. 2d 1271 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 28, 2009
At the meeting, the names of the managers were written on a white board and each was discussed and ranked. Wooten Testimony, Tr. at 330. … In Burk v.
Cited 2 timesPublished46 F. Supp. 3d 1175 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 29, 2014
In Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth and Faragher v. … See Jarvis v.
Cited 0 timesPublished757 F. Supp. 2d 1130 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 2, 2010
In Fields v. … Additionally, in Walters v.
Cited 1 timesPublished506 F. Supp. 2d 851 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2007
She did not feel that she was denied access to the board based on her nonattendance of the board meetings. Id. at 10. However, according to Wolfard, “there were male colleagues that did attend the board. … See Sprague v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSleepy Lagoon, Ltd. v. Tower Group, Inc.
809 F. Supp. 2d 1300 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 19, 2011
Haveron advised Preserver’s Board of Directors (the Board) about Tower’s interest in acquiring Preserver, and the Board voted to pursue a more formal process in which Tower and other interested bidders could submit offers … Tower submitted a proposed purchase price to the Board, and the Board agreed to negotiate exclusively with Tower. Id. Tower drafted a proposed SPA and submitted it to Preserver.
Cited 13 timesPublished939 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 14, 1996
Anderson v. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2024
See Morris, 2010 WL 333527, at *5 (involving a police department and individual police officers); see also Brown, 926 F.2d at 962 (involving a school board and individual school board members). Here, Okla. … school board members who were not named in the first action against the school board); Nusbaum v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown827 F. Supp. 2d 1312 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 25, 2011
EEOC v. … Brown v. Board of Regents, 353 Fed.Appx. 169, 173 (10th Cir.2009); Wilbanks v. Nordam Group, Inc., 2010 WL 4272581 , *17 (N.D.Okla. Oct. 25, 2010). 4 . Braun points to Fr.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2025
When Shaver and Farar-Brown urged July and Proctor to stop beating Ashlock, July accused Farar-Brown of being a snitch and struck Farar-Brown in the eye with a gun or a fist. … See Brown v. Davenport, 596 U.S. 118, 134 (2022) (“While AEDPA announced certain new conditions to relief, it did not guarantee relief upon their satisfaction.”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHane v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.
47 F.2d 244 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1931
My' attention has been directed to the cases of Hunt v. Pearce (C. C. A.) 284 F. 321 ; Keenan v. Gladys Belle Oil Co. (D. C.) 11 F. (2d) 418; Community Bldg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 8 F.(2d) 678 ; Kelly v. … Armstrong v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. (C. C.) 192 F. 608 ; Patchin v. Hunter (C. C.) 38 F. 51 ; Ames v. Chicago, S. F. & C. Ry. Co. (C. C.) 39 F. 881, 883 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedAmerican Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers Union
44 F.R.D. 236 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1968
Co. v. United States for Use of Pickard, 371 U.S. 57 , 83 S.Ct. 108 , 9 L.Ed.2d 31 (1962). … Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange, 270 U.S. 593 , 46 S.Ct. 367 , 70 L.Ed. 750 (1926).
Cited 6 timesPublished265 F. Supp. 3d 1265 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 31, 2017
Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE •THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the- Defendants’ Objections To Court’s First Proposed Jury Instructions, Doc. 339, filed August 10, 2017 (Doc. 348)(“Ob-jections”). … Reis v. Hazelett Strip-Casting Corp., 28 A.3d 442, 466 (Del. Ch. 2011)(quoting Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc., 663 A.2d 1134, 1143 (Del. Ch. 1994)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
5 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1934
New Jersey Bell Telephone Company v. State Board of Taxes *825 and Assessments of the State of New Jersey, 280 U. S. 338 , 50 S. Ct. 111 , 74 L. Ed. 463 ; Western Union Telegraph Company v. State of Texas, 105 U. … City of Sapulpa v. Land, 101 Okl. 22 , 223 P. 640 , 35 A. L. R. 872; Baughman v. Weicker, 136 Okl. 33 , 276 P. 208 ; City of Ardmore v. Excise Board, 155 Okl. 126 , 8 P.(2d) 2.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSales & Advertising Promotion, Inc. v. Donrey, Inc.
598 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1984
Brown Shoe Company v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). 9. … Pacific Engineering v. Kerr McGee, supra; and Telex v. IBM, supra. 16.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna