Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoknd

884 results

0.95s

  • July v. Dowling

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 15, 2025

    When Shaver and Farar-Brown urged July and Proctor to stop beating Ashlock, July accused Farar-Brown of being a snitch and struck Farar-Brown in the eye with a gun or a fist. … See Brown v. Davenport, 596 U.S. 118, 134 (2022) (“While AEDPA announced certain new conditions to relief, it did not guarantee relief upon their satisfaction.”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mengert v. United States

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 31, 2023

    Mengert walked into the private screening room with Morroney and Whitney Brown, another TSA employee, and either Morroney or Brown closed the door to the screening room. Dkt. # 51-2, at 9. … Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250 (1986); Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir. 1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marshall v. Nelson Electric

    766 F. Supp. 1018 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1991

    Baker v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 903 F.2d 1342 (10th Cir.1990); Guinn v. Church of Christ of Collinsville, 775 P.2d 766 (Okla.1989); Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74 (Okla.1986); Williams v. … Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74 (Okla.1986); Williams v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., 688 P.2d 1294 (Okla.1984); Breeden v. League Services Corp., 575 P.2d 1374 (Okla.1978); Floyd v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bjorklund v. Miller

    779 F. Supp. 2d 1283 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 15, 2011

    Calhoun v. … See Eames v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Cities Service Oil Co.

    277 F. Supp. 665 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1967

    The Union has cited the holding of United Steelworkers of America v. … The parties agreed to be bound by the National Labor Relations Board determination of this issue, which was made. Both sides are bound by this decision and the dispute is resolved. In United States Gypsum Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sanders v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.

    676 F. Supp. 2d 1271 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 28, 2009

    At the meeting, the names of the managers were written on a white board and each was discussed and ranked. Wooten Testimony, Tr. at 330. … In Burk v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hawkins v. Smith

    46 F. Supp. 3d 1175 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 29, 2014

    In Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth and Faragher v. … See Jarvis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • HNATH v. Hereford

    757 F. Supp. 2d 1130 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 2, 2010

    In Fields v. … Additionally, in Walters v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Clarke v. Bank of Commerce

    506 F. Supp. 2d 851 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2007

    She did not feel that she was denied access to the board based on her nonattendance of the board meetings. Id. at 10. However, according to Wolfard, “there were male colleagues that did attend the board. … See Sprague v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sleepy Lagoon, Ltd. v. Tower Group, Inc.

    809 F. Supp. 2d 1300 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 19, 2011

    Haveron advised Preserver’s Board of Directors (the Board) about Tower’s interest in acquiring Preserver, and the Board voted to pursue a more formal process in which Tower and other interested bidders could submit offers … Tower submitted a proposed purchase price to the Board, and the Board agreed to negotiate exclusively with Tower. Id. Tower drafted a proposed SPA and submitted it to Preserver.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Crystal Bay Marina v. Sweeden

    939 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 14, 1996

    Anderson v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richter v. Nelson

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2024

    See Morris, 2010 WL 333527, at *5 (involving a police department and individual police officers); see also Brown, 926 F.2d at 962 (involving a school board and individual school board members). Here, Okla. … school board members who were not named in the first action against the school board); Nusbaum v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Braun v. St. Pius X Parish

    827 F. Supp. 2d 1312 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 25, 2011

    EEOC v. … Brown v. Board of Regents, 353 Fed.Appx. 169, 173 (10th Cir.2009); Wilbanks v. Nordam Group, Inc., 2010 WL 4272581 , *17 (N.D.Okla. Oct. 25, 2010). 4 . Braun points to Fr.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • July v. Tinsley

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2025

    When Shaver and Farar-Brown urged July and Proctor to stop beating Ashlock, July accused Farar-Brown of being a snitch and struck Farar-Brown in the eye with a gun or a fist. … See Brown v. Davenport, 596 U.S. 118, 134 (2022) (“While AEDPA announced certain new conditions to relief, it did not guarantee relief upon their satisfaction.”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hane v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.

    47 F.2d 244 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1931

    My' attention has been directed to the cases of Hunt v. Pearce (C. C. A.) 284 F. 321 ; Keenan v. Gladys Belle Oil Co. (D. C.) 11 F. (2d) 418; Community Bldg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 8 F.(2d) 678 ; Kelly v. … Armstrong v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. (C. C.) 192 F. 608 ; Patchin v. Hunter (C. C.) 38 F. 51 ; Ames v. Chicago, S. F. & C. Ry. Co. (C. C.) 39 F. 881, 883 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • American Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers Union

    44 F.R.D. 236 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1968

    Co. v. United States for Use of Pickard, 371 U.S. 57 , 83 S.Ct. 108 , 9 L.Ed.2d 31 (1962). … Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange, 270 U.S. 593 , 46 S.Ct. 367 , 70 L.Ed. 750 (1926).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • SFF-TIR, LLC v. Stephenson

    265 F. Supp. 3d 1265 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 31, 2017

    Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE •THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the- Defendants’ Objections To Court’s First Proposed Jury Instructions, Doc. 339, filed August 10, 2017 (Doc. 348)(“Ob-jections”). … Reis v. Hazelett Strip-Casting Corp., 28 A.3d 442, 466 (Del. Ch. 2011)(quoting Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc., 663 A.2d 1134, 1143 (Del. Ch. 1994)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

    5 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1934

    New Jersey Bell Telephone Company v. State Board of Taxes *825 and Assessments of the State of New Jersey, 280 U. S. 338 , 50 S. Ct. 111 , 74 L. Ed. 463 ; Western Union Telegraph Company v. State of Texas, 105 U. … City of Sapulpa v. Land, 101 Okl. 22 , 223 P. 640 , 35 A. L. R. 872; Baughman v. Weicker, 136 Okl. 33 , 276 P. 208 ; City of Ardmore v. Excise Board, 155 Okl. 126 , 8 P.(2d) 2.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sales & Advertising Promotion, Inc. v. Donrey, Inc.

    598 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1984

    Brown Shoe Company v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). 9. … Pacific Engineering v. Kerr McGee, supra; and Telex v. IBM, supra. 16.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.