Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

3,434 results

0.92s

  • Hamilton v. State

    79 Okla. Crim. 108 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1944

    In the case of Cook v. State, 36 Okla. … See, also, Appleby v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 284 , 146 P. 228 ; Watson v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 590 , 124 P. 1101 ; Weitz v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 35 , 104 P. 2d 445 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wilcox v. State

    15 Okla. Crim. 453 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1919

    Laws 1910; Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 177 Pac. 570 , not yet officially reported; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 Pac. 707 ; Scott v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 657 . The appeal is dismissed. DOYLE, P.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Howell v. State

    33 Okla. Crim. 292 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1926

    To effect their entrance into the loft of this house, the officers pried off a board nailed over an opening- into the loft. The defendant denied having any knowledge of the presence of whisky in this house. … Gore v. State, 24 Okla. Cr. 394 , 218 P. 545 ; Russell v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 423 , 221 P. 113 ; Foster v. State, 27 Okla. Cr. 270 , 226 P. 602 ; Hannan v. State, 29 Okla. Cr. 203 , 223 P. 249 ; Reutlinger v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gooden v. State

    617 P.2d 248 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1980

    O’Brien v. State, Okl.Cr., 540 P.2d 579 (1975). … Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 541 P.2d 242 (1975).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Clay v. State

    593 P.2d 509 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1979

    Stockton v. State, Okl.Cr., 508 P.2d 663 (1973), Bass v. State, Okl.Cr., 489 P.2d 1343 (1971). This position is not correct. Menna v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); Delaune v. State, Okl.Cr., 569 P.2d 463 (1977) and Burks v. State, Okl.Cr., 568 P.2d 1311 (1977).

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by Davis v. State, 70 O.B.A.J. 3763 (1999)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Basham v. State

    340 P.2d 461 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 27, 1959

    Gorum v. State, supra. In Forte v. U. S., 68 App. … State, 30 Okl.Cr. 31 , 234 P. 782 ; Brown v. State, 81 Okl.Cr. 303 , 164 P.2d 249 , 166 P.2d 1021 ; Phillips v. State, 29 Ga. 105 ; Kansas v. Cardwell, 90 Kan. 606 , 135 P. 597 , L.R.A. 1916B, 745 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Miller v. State

    781 P.2d 846 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1989

    See also Brown v. State, 762 P.2d 959, 962 (Okl.Cr.1988). … Compare Brown at 962; Johnson at 490-91. Regardless of this Batson requirement, appellant cites Peters v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Byrne v. State

    482 P.2d 620 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1971

    In Bland v. … Furthermore, there is nothing in the record to indicate that defendant was denied access to the chalk board illustration.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bruton v. State

    305 P.2d 1045 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1957

    Walker v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 284 , 207 P.2d 341 ; Frizzell v. State, Okl.Cr., 299 P.2d 547 ; Runyon v. State, Okl.Cr., 304 P.2d 353 . … He cites Goodner v. State, 32 Okl.Cr. 192 , 239 P. 928 ; Price v. State, 1 Okl.Cr. 358 , 98 P. 447 ; Lail v. State, 14 Okl.Cr. 596 , 174 P. 1099 ; and Roddie v. State, 19 Okl.Cr. 63 , 198 P. 342 , as his authority.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State

    54 Okla. Crim. 236 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 6, 1933

    had shot a fellow and had to- make a quick get *238 away, and that they wanted the car; that the driver speeded up the car and steered into1 a fence post, either knocking or causing one of the men to fall off the running board … In the recent case of Braley v. State, 54 Okla.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. State

    38 Okla. Crim. 181 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1927

    The only affirmative testimony as to a search warrant is that of the witness Nelms, constable of Brown township. In view of the testimony of R. N. … Smith v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 392 , 246 P. 1109 ; Howell v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 292 , 243 P. 997 ; McClary v. State, 34 Okla. Cr. 403 , 246 P. 891 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State

    581 P.2d 467 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1978

    We find the present case totally unlike Brown v. State, supra. … Cf., Brown v. State, supra; Fite v. State, Okl.Cr., 526 P.2d 956 (1974). And yet, countless times this Court has observed the prosecutor seize upon the flimsiest of reasons for introducing such evidence. Why?

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Carney v. State

    29 Okla. Crim. 83 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1925

    Wildman, business man, King Rhodes, farmer, cattleman, and deputy sheriff, and John Brown, each testified that they had known the defendant from 5 to 15 years, and knew his general reputation and character *85 as to being … Davidson v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 85 , 175 P. 120 ; Kirby v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 330 , 220 P. 74 , 33 A. L. R. 1212.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Collier v. State

    54 Okla. Crim. 441 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1933

    In Blackwell v. State, 54' Okla. … Cr. 217 , 144 Pac. 629 ; McClure v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 60 , 237 Pac. 145 ; Loveless v. State, 43 Okla. Cr. 146 , 277 Pac. 672 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cheney v. State

    66 O.B.A.J. 3916 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1995

    Brown, 753 P.2d at 910 . In Moore v. … State, 767 P.2d 887, 890 (Okl.Cr.1988) (prior incidents where husband attacked wife was properly admitted in marital homicide case); Brown v.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • In Re Williams

    341 P.2d 652 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1959

    Following the above, the date of execution was advanced to give counsel time to appear before the Pardon and Parole Board to seek a recommendation by that Board to the Governor that the death sentence be reduced to that of … But we have here a felony case, and no doubt can be cast upon the application of the rule that we have quoted from Brown v. State, supra. See also the later cases of Landon v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Reeves v. State

    36 Okla. Crim. 409 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1927

    Cr. 449 , 148 P. 1061 ; State Board of Dental Examiners v. Pollock, 125 Okla. 170 , 256 P. 927 ; Coulson v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 403 , 127 P. 1090 ; Wilson v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 493 , 129 P. 82 ; Gobin v. State, 9 Okla. … S.) 1089; Jackson v. State, *411 22 Okla. Cr. 338 , 211 P. 1066 ; State ex rel., etc., v. Board, etc., 31 Wash. 492 , 72 P. 110 . There is some contention made that the court admitted incompetent evidence.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gatewood v. State

    57 Okla. Crim. 200 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1935

    S. 1931, provides: “No warrant shall be issued to search a private residence, occupied as such, unless it, or some part of it, is used as a store, shop, hotel, boarding house, or place for storage, or unless such residence … Cosby v. State, 30 Okla. Cr. 405 , 236 Pac. 906 ; McClure v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 60 , 237 Pac. 145 ; Dibrell v. State, 36 Okla. Cr. 177 , 253 Pac. 108 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shackelford v. State

    473 P.2d 330 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1970

    The proprietor’s wife reported the incident immediately to the police, describing the men as being of the same build, one wearing a grayish-brownish shirt with a little design, and one having brown hair and the other black … State, 61 Okl.Cr. 169 , 66 P.2d 955 , Bowdry v. State, 64 Okl.Cr. 86 , 77 P.2d 753 , and others. This contention ignores the undisputed fact that whatever the state of mind of Sgt.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hubbard v. State

    62 O.B.A.J. 2252 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1991

    Brown v. State, 674 P.2d 46, 48 (Okl.Cr.1983). … Penny v. State, 765 P.2d 797, 800 (Okl.Cr. 1988). The United States Supreme Court stated in Keeble v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.