Case law

King v. State

92 Okla. Crim. 389 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1950

"In Farmer v. State, 86 Okla. … "In Matthews v State, 67 Okla.

Turnage v. State

40 Okla. Crim. 180 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 26, 1928

In Menefee v. State, 30 Okla. … Cummings v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 274 , 240 P. 1078 ; Raymer et al. v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 385 , 241 P. 499 ; Cooley v. State, 34 Okla. Cr. 281 , 246 P. 650 .

Foster v. State

27 Okla. Crim. 270 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1924

In the case of Gore v. State, 24 Okla. … In Russell v. State, 25 Okla.

Carter v. State

763 P.2d 394 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1988

Nelson v. State, 687 P.2d 744, 746 (Okl.Cr.1984). … Brown v. State, 518 P.2d 898, 901 (Okl.Cr.1973); Hays v. State, 617 P.2d 223, 228 (Okl.Cr.1980). In the case at bar, the chain of custody was admittedly broken when members of appellant’s family entered the vehicle.

Neal v. State

696 P.2d 508 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1985

Officer Harris stated that he was unable to determine the contents of appellant’s jacket so he removed several items from appellant’s coat pocket: a cigarette lighter, a pocket knife, a notebook, various papers, and a brown … search him terminated and the warrantless search of the contents of the bottle was unlawful, since the search of the bottle was not “an intrusion reasonably designed to discover instruments of assault” as required by Terry v.

Luck v. State

38 Okla. Crim. 322 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1927

met him in Winter’s real estate office, and Slagle again wanted to buy some whisky; that he did not think that he could get him any whisky, but would try, and he went out and picked up a bottle in the alley and went into Brown … And see Phelps v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 380 , 244 P. 453 ; Gabler v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 317 , 243 P. 981 ; Prochneau v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 210 , 240 P. 1090 .

Jones v. State

321 P.2d 432 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1958

As to the sale on October 1, 1956, witness said that when Ford came out he handed him a 16 ounce brown bottle, with plastic cap, that contained a brown solution. … See Warren v. State, 1926, 35 Okl.Cr. 430 , 251 P. 101 ; Rider v. State, 1932, 53 Okl.Cr. 393 , 12 P.2d 552 ; Lee v. State, 1939, 66 Okl.Cr. 399 , 92 P.2d 621 ; Finley v.

Watson v. State

73 Okla. Crim. 58 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1941

Smith v. State, 56 Okla. Cr. 103 , 34 P. 2d 280 ; Pickens v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 301 , 106 P. 2d 127 ; Pickens v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 167 , 110 P. 2d 319 ; Mitchell v. State, 43 Okla. Cr. 63 , 277 P. 260 ; Weisband v. … Loveless v. State, 43 Okla. Cr. 146 , 277 P. 672 ; Duncan v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 217 , 144 P. 629 ; Bayne v. State, 42 Okla. Cr. 81 , 274 P. 694 ; Foster v. State, 27 Okla. Cr. 270 , 226 P. 602 ; Hyatt v.

WASHINGTON v. STATE

541 P.3d 852 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 2023

McDaniel v. Brown , 558 U.S. 120, 130-31 (2010). … The logical answer is no. ¶3 The court's opinion relies on the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v.

Jones v. State

69 Okla. Crim. 244 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1940

The record herein discloses that many hundreds of requisition claims were being issued by the county welfare board of Oklahoma county; to expedite the handling of these requisitions, the welfare board adopted the policy of … Carter v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 282 , 118 P. 264 ; Baldwin v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 228 , 144 P. 634 ; Jackson v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 338 , 211 P. 1066, 1072 ; Gore v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 214 , 219 P. 153 ; Ross v.

Henson v. State

522 P.2d 299 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 8, 1974

In S ande fur v. State, Okl. … See: Collins v. State, Okl.Cr., 407 P.2d 609 .”

Williams v. Page

430 P.2d 345 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1967

. * * * ” And see Riopella v. … Waters v. Lackey, 97 Okl.Cr. 41 , 257 P.2d 849 .

Ex Parte Gilbert

71 Okla. Crim. 268 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1941

“The boards of insanity are special boards created by law for a special purpose. … W. 56 ; Allen v. State, 16 Tex. App. 237; State v. Olds, 106 Iowa, 110 , 76 N. W. 644 ; State v. Sackett, 39 Minn. 69 , 38 N. W. 773 ; State v. Polson, 29 Iowa, 133 ; People v. Murray, 52 Mich. 288 , 17 N.

Ellis v. State

65 O.B.A.J. 475 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1994

Citing Batson v. … Brown, 817 F.2d 674 (10th Cir.1987); Garrett v. Morris, 815 F.2d 509 (8th Cir.1987); and United States v. Chalan, 812 F.2d 1302 (10th Cir.1987).

Hall v. State

650 P.2d 893 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 1, 1982

In view of Harris v. Oklahoma, 433 U.S. 682 , 97 S.Ct. 2912 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1977); and Brown v. Ohio, 431 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977), we find that the double jeopardy clause was violated. … In Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137 , 97 S.Ct. 2207 , 53 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977) (plurality opinion), the Supreme Court enunciated exceptions to the rule established in the Brown decision.

Cherry v. State

33 Okla. Crim. 37 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1925

Frazier v. U. S., 2 Okla. Cr. 657 , 103 P. 373 ; Green v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 194 , 122 P. 1108 ; Brown v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 P. 359 ; Marston v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 275 , 131 P. 716 ; Choate v. State, 12 Okla. … A. 1917A, 1287; Francis v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 543 , 185 P. 126 ; Henry v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 189 , 169 P. 658 ; Boyle v. State, 27 Okla. Cr. 196 , 226 P. 389 .

Roberts v. State

564 P.2d 246 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 9, 1977

[Tr. 171] Belinda Sue Brown testified that she went to the Edmond Liquor Store on the evening in question, arriving at approximately 9:30 p.m. … This issue was determined by this Court in Riggs v. Branch, Okl.Cr., 554 P.2d 823 (1976). We therein held that the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Woodson v.

Denton v. State

58 Okla. Crim. 275 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1935

Under this assignment, objection was also made to juror Brown. This juror was drawn from the box as a member of the regular panel; the objection is that he was not a taxpayer, citing State v. … The case of ¡State v. Willis, supra, is not in point for the reason the law of that state requires á juror shall be a taxpayer. The juror Brown was qualified.

Winter v. State

368 P.2d 514 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1962

Also see Brown v. State, 81 Okl. … Very similar cases to support this theory may be found in Phenis v. State, 76 Okl.Cr. 156 , 135 P.2d 62 , and Brown v. State, 81 Okl.Cr. 303 , 164 P.2d 249 , 166 P.2d 1021 .

Harvell v. State

395 P.2d 331 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1964

Brown v. State, 9 Okl.Cr. 382 , 132 P. 359 ; Hughes v. State, 7 Okl.Cr. 117 , 122 P. 554 . There is no contention here that the defendant was not granted a preliminary examination. … In Bingham v.