Case law

Burns v. State

595 P.2d 801 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 23, 1979

Jones v. United States, supra, 362 U.S. at 263 , 80 S.Ct. 725 ; Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 390 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 ; Brown v. … Brown v. United States, supra, 411 U.S. at 229 , 93 S.Ct. at 1569 . This is simply not a proper case for invocation of Jones “automatic standing.”

Hall v. State

498 P.2d 415 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1972

Charles Brown, an employee of the telephone company, testified that prior to November 26, he set a telephone trap on the receiver of Mrs. Thorn’s telephone. … Charles Brown was recalled and testified that he examined the telephone wires behind the defendant’s residence and in his opinion, the wires were freshly cut.

Meek v. State

54 Okla. Crim. 415 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1933

Key v. City of Ardmore, 30 Okla. Cr. 8 , 234 Pac. 793 ; Ex parte *418 Fuller, 31 Okla. Cr. 289 , 238 Pac. 512 ; Brown v. State, 47 Okla. Cr. 169 , 286 Pac. 911 ; Smith v. State, 47 Okla. … In Bryan v.

Hallcy v. State

153 P.3d 66 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 2007

Ball v. … Brown, 460 U.S. at 742 , 103 S.Ct. at 1543 ; Bland v. State, 2000 OK CR 11, ¶ 45 , 4 P.3d 702, 717 .

Minter v. State

765 P.2d 803 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1988

v. … Brown, 677 P.2d at 1092 .

Bloxham v. State

600 P.2d 341 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1979

In Bumper v. … Bumper v. North Carolina, supra; also, Sanders v. State, Okl.Cr., 556 P.2d 611 (1976).

Lay v. State

568 P.2d 295 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 12, 1977

The officers saw “in plain view” (State v. … See, Bennett v. State, Okl.Cr., 507 P.2d 1252 (1973). Defendant, in a separate pro se brief filed with this Court, argues that the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v.

White v. Coleman

475 P.2d 404 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1970

Article 6, § 10, of the Oklahoma Constitution creates the Pardon and Parole Board and sets out its duties regarding commutations, pardons and paroles. … Constitutional Law §§ 98, 99; Wood v. State, 77 Okl.Cr. 305 , 141 P.2d 309 .

Wilson v. State

70 O.B.A.J. 148 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1998

Although he was tried conjointly with codefendant Brown, each defendant had a separate jury deciding their fate. ¶ 11 In Cohee v. … Luna v.

Allen v. State

490 P.2d 778 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1971

The defendant cites a large number of authorities to support this proposition, but relies primarily on the recent case of Moon v. State, Okl.Cr., 475 P.2d 410 (1970) and Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 487 P.2d 963 . … In the recent case of Brown v. State, supra, Judge Nix stated: “The only guise for the questioning about other offenses was impeachment of the witness’s credibility.

Dunford v. State

561 P.2d 579 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1977

In Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 518 P.2d 898 (1974), we dealt with a similar question wherein the admission of the State’s Exhibit No. 3, a hydraulic jack, was in question. … In Whitehead v.

KELLY III v. STATE

541 P.3d 846 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 2023

Brown v. State, 2018 OK CR 3, ¶ 85 , 422 P.3d 155, 172-73 . … STATE Discussed at Length 2016 OK CR 21 , 387 P.3d 934 , MITCHELL v. STATE Discussed at Length 2018 OK CR 3 , 422 P.3d 155 , BROWN v. STATE Discussed at Length 1980 OK CR 75 , 617 P.2d 243 , COLEMAN v.

Steele v. State

357 P.2d 252 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1960

This Court has said in many cases too innumerable to mention and specifically in Hulsey v. … When defendant’s car was stopped, defendant dropped a brown envelope to the ground and kicked it under *254 the car, and the officers recovered the package; that when they got it from ttnder the car it had his wife’s name

Smith v. State

362 P.2d 113 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1961

Brown v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 389 , 208 P.2d 1143, 1144 . The casemade is accordingly stricken. … Patton v. State, 60 Okl.Cr. 409 , 64 P.2d 1245 ; Payne v. State, 84 Okl.Cr. 166 , 180 P.2d 193 ; State v. Smith, Okl.Cr., 268 P.2d 587 .

Thompson v. State

6 Okla. Crim. 50 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1911

In the case of Sturgis v. State, 2 Olcla. Cr. 385, this court said: “In the case of Devore v. … See Byers v. Territory, 1 Okla. Cr. 698 .

King v. State

92 Okla. Crim. 389 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1950

"In Farmer v. State, 86 Okla. … "In Matthews v State, 67 Okla.

Turnage v. State

40 Okla. Crim. 180 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 26, 1928

In Menefee v. State, 30 Okla. … Cummings v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 274 , 240 P. 1078 ; Raymer et al. v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 385 , 241 P. 499 ; Cooley v. State, 34 Okla. Cr. 281 , 246 P. 650 .

Blackwell v. State

54 Okla. Crim. 401 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1933

The court, in Duncan v. … McClure v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 60 , 237 Pac. 145 ; Loveless v. State, 43 Okla. Cr. 146 , 277 Pac. 672 .

Carter v. State

763 P.2d 394 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1988

Nelson v. State, 687 P.2d 744, 746 (Okl.Cr.1984). … Brown v. State, 518 P.2d 898, 901 (Okl.Cr.1973); Hays v. State, 617 P.2d 223, 228 (Okl.Cr.1980). In the case at bar, the chain of custody was admittedly broken when members of appellant’s family entered the vehicle.

Neal v. State

696 P.2d 508 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1985

Officer Harris stated that he was unable to determine the contents of appellant’s jacket so he removed several items from appellant’s coat pocket: a cigarette lighter, a pocket knife, a notebook, various papers, and a brown … search him terminated and the warrantless search of the contents of the bottle was unlawful, since the search of the bottle was not “an intrusion reasonably designed to discover instruments of assault” as required by Terry v.