Case law

Prescott v. State

56 Okla. Crim. 259 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1934

Cole v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 430 , 195 Pac. 901 ; Smith v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 519 , 196 Pac. 734 ; Adeaholt v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 122 , 198 Pac. 351 ; Campbell v. State, 23 Okla. Cr. 259 , 214 Pac. 738 ; Mayse v. … In Hall v. State, 11 Okla.

In Re Story

80 Okla. Crim. 11 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1945

Story v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 273 , 120 P. 2d 387 . … Barrett v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 414 , 132 P. 2d 657 .

Hensley v. State

493 P.2d 849 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1972

Officer Brundridge’s testimony did not differ substantially from the testimony of Captain Brown. … Ragland v. State, Okl.Cr., 404 P.2d 84 . It is apparent from the Record that this was the first case tried by the Assistant District Attorney.

Abbitt v. State

282 P.2d 246 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1955

See Tit. 22 O.S.1951 § 991; Martin v. State, 67 Okl.Cr. 390 , 94 P.2d 270 ; Ross v. State, 78 Okl.Cr. 293 , 147 P.2d 797 ; Shannon v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 18 , 256 P.2d 475 . … See Tit. 22 O.S.1951 § 1054; Dunn v. State, 18 Okl.Cr. 493 , 196 P. 739 ; Clark v. State, 18 Okl.Cr. 145 , 193 P. 1008 ; Howey v. State, 9 Okl. Cr. 453, 132 P. 499 ; Brown v.

Mendenhall v. United States

6 Okla. Crim. 436 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1911

Higgins v. Brown; 1 Okla. Cr. 33 , 94 Pac. 703 ; Ex parte Ellis, 1 Okla. Cr. 125 , 94 Pac. 556 ; Ex parte Curlee, 1 Okla. Cr. 145 , 95 Pac. 414 . … See, also, Hawkins v. U. S., 3 Okla. Cr. 651, 108 Pac. 561 , and Warren v. State, infra, 115 Pac. 812 .

Application of Degen

359 P.2d 740 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1961

In Freeman v. … he proceeded to trial, the State would have been unable to prove his guilt by competent evidence beyond a reasonable doubt cannot be inquired into in a habeas corpus proceeding under the rule set forth in Application of Brown

Application of Poston

281 P.2d 776 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1955

Magee v. People, 79 Colo. 328, 333 , 245 P. 708 ; Ex parte Mote, 98 Kan. 804 , 160 P. 223 ; State v. Browning, 70 S.C. 466 , 50 S.E. 185 ; People v. … We are impressed by the reasoning of the court in Brown v.

LEE v. STATE

422 P.3d 782 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 31, 2018

The fact that the Pardon and Parole Board has arbitrarily set forty-five (45) years as the number the Board will use to comply with the "Forgotten Man Act", 57 O.S.Supp.2013 § 332.7, does not affect the actual sentence; that … number affects only when the Board will consider the inmate for purposes of parole.

Doser v. State

88 Okla. Crim. 299 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1949

Brown: Objected to incompetent, irrelevant and highly improper. By the Court: Overruled. By Mr. Brown: Exception. Q. … In support of this proposition she cites Crenshaw v. State, 48 Tex. Cr. R. 77 , 85 S.W. 1147 ; Wadkins v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 110 , 124 S.W. 959 ; Campbell v. State, 57 Tex. Cr. R. 301 , 123 S.W. 583 ; Brown v.

Peck v. State

50 Okla. Crim. 213 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1931

In Cokely v. State, 28 Okla. Cr. 431 , 231 Pac. 330 , it is held: “That the evidence of a self-confessed accomplice is insufficient to sustain a conviction.” In Kelley v. State, 31 Okla. … In Stevens v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 247 , 238 Pac. 216 , in the second paragraph of the syllabus, the court said: “Under section 2701, C.

Hill v. State

38 Okla. Crim. 317 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1927

In Klein v. State, 26 Okla. … Crossman v. State, 28 Okla. Cr. 198 , 230 P. 291 ; Combest v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 47 , 239 P. 936 ; Thomas v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 57 , 240 P. 133 .

Young v. State

74 Okla. Crim. 64 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1942

See Brown v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 442 , 119 P. 447 . “In the instant case, there was no attempt to give the notice required by the statute. … Lewis v. Russell, Judge, supra; State ex rel., etc., v. Lockridge, Judge, 6 Okla. Cr. 216 , 118 P. 152 , 45 L.R.A., N.S., 525, Ann. Cas. 1913C, 251; State v. Brown, Judge, 8 Okla. Cr. 40 , 126 P. 245 , Ann.

Hargrove v. State

18 Okla. Crim. 57 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1920

450, and plaintiff in error Brown was sentenced to serve a term of 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $100. … Talkington et al. v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 83 , 175 Pac. 132 ; Odom v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 540 , 129 Pac. 445 .

State v. Lumley

83 Okla. Crim. 430 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1947

Lumley”, and removed to the Mulford home, said property being as follows, to wit: Brown straw hat, felt hat, black lace hat, green hat, navy blue hat, brown silk hat, green plush hat, white straw hat, brown straw hat, dinner … See Luker v. State, 60 Okla. Cr. 151 , 62 P. 2d 255 ; also, Sallee v. State, 54 Okla.

BOSSE v. STATE

400 P.3d 834 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 25, 2017

Bosse’s reliance on Brown v. … Malone v. State, 2013 OK CR 1, ¶ 87 , 293 P.3d 198, 221-22 ; Brown v. Sanders, 546 U.S. 212, 220 , 126 S.Ct. 884, 892 , 163 L.Ed.2d 723 (2006).

Hartsfield v. State

722 P.2d 717 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1986

This Court has held in Pisano v. … In Miskovsky v.

Murray v. State

55 Okla. Crim. 241 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1934

satisfactorily account for this money to his successor in office; that defendant had paid out money on checks against the township funds to various persons without any claim having been filed therefor with the township board … Hogan v. State, 42 Okla. Cr. 188 , 275 Pac. 355 ; State v. Williams, 44 Okla. Cr. 430 , 281 Pac. 321 ; Hutchinson v. State, 45 Okla. Cr. 230 , 282 Pac. 694 .

Curtis v. State

78 Okla. Crim. 282 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1944

Couch v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 223 , 110 P. 2d 613 ; Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608 , 55 S. Ct. 570 , 79 L. Ed. 1086 ; Harris v. State, 41 Okla. Cr. 221 , 271 P. 263 ; Holt v. … Winberry v. Hallihan, 361 Ill. 121 , 197 N. E. 552 ; Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, supra; People v. People’s Stock Yards State Bank, 344 Ill. 462 , 176 N. E. 901 .

Mathis v. City of Tulsa

97 Okla. Crim. 152 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1953

Patterson v. State, 67 Okla. Cr. 98 , 92 P. 2d 1079 ; Crim v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 390 , 99 P. 2d 185 ; Williams v. State,, 95 Okla. Cr. 131 , 240 P. 2d 1132 . … Tit. 22 O.S. 1951 § 1224; Bowdry v. State, 60 Okla. Cr. 46 , 61 P. 2d 31 ; Hensley v. State, 63 Okla. Cr. 22 , 3 P. 2d 211 .

Stephenson v. State

30 Okla. Crim. 286 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 7, 1925

Shires v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 89 , 99 P. 1100 ; Brown v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 P. 359 . Complaint is made of the instructions to the jury.