Case law

Butler v. State

545 P.2d 1298 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1976

See, Williams v. State, Okl.Cr., 373 P.2d 91 (1962). Defendant’s second assignment of error asserts the punishment is excessive. … See, Roberts v. State, Okl.Cr., 473 P.2d 264 (1970).

White v. State

372 P.2d 236 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1962

The plaintiff in error has not filed a brief in the cause, and under these conditions, we follow the well established rule set forth in Brown v. … Hulsey v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 332 , 169 P.2d 771 .

Matthews v. State

45 P.3d 907 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2002

Spears v. … Carter v.

Logan v. State

493 P.2d 842 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1972

The defendant does not allege anything other than the passage of time insofar as prejudice to his rights and this Court feels Brown v. … Jones v.

Parks v. State

24 Okla. Crim. 272 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1923

The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained upon authority of the following cases: Odom v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 540 , 129 Pac. 445 ; Ernst v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 282 , 187 Pac. 930 ; Brown v. State, 16 Okla.

Miller v. State

313 P.3d 934 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 2013

Harmon, 2011 OK CR 6 ¶ 21 , 248 P.3d at 930 (quoting Littlejohn v. State, 2004 OK CR 6, ¶ 49 , 85 P.3d 287, 301-02 ) (emphasis added). 15 In Brown v. … Uttecht v.

Coppler v. State

52 Okla. Crim. 275 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1931

It may be shown by others having knowledge of the facts.” 1 McClain on Criminal Law, p. 558.’ ” See, also, Brown v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 Pac. 359 ; Frye et al. v State, 25 Okla. … Ev. 201; Reg. v. Burton, Dears, Cr. Cas. 282; Rex v. Burdett, 4 Barn. & Ald. 122; McCulloch v. State, 48 Ind. 112 ; Brown v. State, 1 Tex. App. 155; Roberts v. State, 61 Ala. 401 ; State v. Ah Chuey, 14 Nev. 92 , 33 Am.

Dickerson v. State

74 Okla. Crim. 229 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1942

Brown Company.” And he says this was an attempt “to enlarge section 2125, O. … Brown Company. “In my opinion the effect of all this was to enlarge section 2125, O.

Box v. State

506 P.2d 969 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1973

After the defendant was jailed, Brown removed paint scrapings from the bumper of the pickup which was parked on a public street near the court house. *972 In the case of Cooper v. … In the case of People v.

Castor v. State

499 P.2d 948 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1972

Brown Store, and had been for approximately four years. … In Hagan v.

Cox v. State

89 Okla. Crim. 256 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 25, 1949

In Sheldon v. Green, 182 Okla. 208 , 77 P. 2d 114, 115 , it was said: “In Layne v. State, 23 Okla. … In the body of the opinion the Supreme Court cited the case of Privett v. Board of Education of Slab Fork School District, 104 W. Va. 35 , 138 S.

Luellen v. State

64 Okla. Crim. 382 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1938

Cr. 287 , 10 P. 2d 731 ; Harragara v. State, 52 Okla. Cr. 41 , 3 P. 2d 749 ; Lee v. State, 49 Okla. Cr. 258 , 293 P. 1114 ; Davis v. State, 48 Okla. Cr. 186 , 290 P. 347 ; Brown v. State, 48 Okla. … Cr. 251 , 290 P. 416 ; Ware v. State, 47 Okla. Cr. 434 , 288 P. 374 ; Brown v. State, 47 Okla. Cr. 169 , 286 P. 911 ; Bruce v. State, 46 Okla. Cr. 214 , 287 P. 809 ; Ryan v. State, 46 Okla. Cr. 5 , 283 P. 809 ; Welch v.

Alverson v. State

70 O.B.A.J. 1566 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 6, 1999

The codefendants were Michael Lee Wilson, Darwin Demond Brown and Richard Harjo. Wilson and Brown were tried conjointly and sentenced to death. Their appeals were affirmed in Wilson v. … Brown v.

Stanley v. State

512 P.2d 829 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1973

Ryans v. State, Okl.Cr., 420 P.2d 556 (1966). We therefore find this proposition to be without merit. … Wofford v. State, Okl.Cr., 494 P.2d 672 (1972).

George v. State

56 Okla. Crim. 370 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1935

Brown v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 11 , 23 Pac. (2d) 719 ; Austin v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 278 , 28 Pac. (2d) 1113 .

Prescott v. State

56 Okla. Crim. 259 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1934

Cole v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 430 , 195 Pac. 901 ; Smith v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 519 , 196 Pac. 734 ; Adeaholt v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 122 , 198 Pac. 351 ; Campbell v. State, 23 Okla. Cr. 259 , 214 Pac. 738 ; Mayse v. … In Hall v. State, 11 Okla.

Cadwell v. State

56 Okla. Crim. 369 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1935

Brown v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 11 , 23 Pac. (2d) 719 ; Austin v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 278 , 28 Pac. (2d) 1113 .

Ex Parte Terrill

47 Okla. Crim. 92 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1930

C.) 46 F. 477 ; Com. v. Francies, 250 Pa. 350 , 95 A. 798 ; Weems v. U. S., 217 U. S. 349 , 30 S. Ct. 544 , 54 L. Ed. 793 , 19 Ann. Cas. 705; In re Medley, 134 U. S. 160 , 10 S. Ct. 384 , 33 L. Ed. 835 . … Tucker v. Davis, 9 Okla. Cr. 94 , 130 Pac. 962 , 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1083. This case was followed and approved in Ex parte Rider, 50 Cal. App. 797 , 195 Pac. 965 .

Williams v. State

62 O.B.A.J. 814 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1991

The board used to inflict Mr. Curlee’s fatal injuries was left by T.C. in an adjoining yard under some debris. … In the present case, appellant wilfully accompanied T.C., who was armed with a board, into the victim’s home. When Mr. Curlee awoke and became startled by the assailants’ presence, T.C. hit him with the board.

Bird v. State

507 P.2d 545 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1973

Watt v. State, supra. In Lawson v. … In State v.