Case law

Neivar v. State

26 Okla. Crim. 112 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1924

The case of State v. Thomason, 23 Okla. Cr. 104 , 212 Pac. 1026 , is authority to the effect that a prosecution will lie for an attempt to manufacture whisky under section 2297, Compiled Statutes 1921. … State v. Brown, 114 Kan. 699 , 220 Pac. 174 ; Whitten v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 447 , 221 Pac. 115 . The judgment is affirmed. BESSEY and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

McGuire v. Wilkerson

22 Okla. Crim. 36 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1922

State v. Pitney, 79 Wash. 608 , 140 Pac. 918 , Ann. Cas. 1916A, 209; Nolen v. Riechman (D. C.) 225 Fed. 812 ; Ex parte Sullivan, 77 Tex. Cr. R. 72 , 178 S. W. 537 ; Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co., 240 U. S. 342 , 36 Sup. … In Swann et al. v.

Fryar v. State

440 P.2d 204 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1968

See, also, Hurst v. Pitman, 90 Okl.Cr. 329 , 213 P.2d 877 ; Bonsor v. District Court of Cimmarron County, Okl.Cr., 303 P.2d 471 ; White v. Brown, Okl.Cr., 349 P.2d 509 ; Auten v. … State, Okl.Cr., 377 P.2d 61 ; and Dreadfulwater v. State, Okl.Cr., 415 P.2d 493 ; Application of Melton, Okl.Cr., 342 P.2d 571 ; Head v. State, Okl.Cr., 388 P.2d 327 ; and in another recent decision of Angel v.

Ex Parte Bassett

59 Okla. Crim. 329 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1936

The question presented was before the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in the recent case of Whitson v. … Rep. 655 ; Whitson v. City of Ada, 171 Okla. 491 , 44 Pac. (2d) 829 . It is evident from the record that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief prayed for.

Jacobson v. State

684 P.2d 556 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1984

Assadollah v. State, 632 P.2d 1215 (Okl.Cr.1981), citing Oxendine v. State, 335 P.2d 940 (Okl.Cr.1958). … See, Frazier v. State, 654 P.2d 639 (Okl.Cr.1982); and Johnson v. State, 621 P.2d 1162 (Okl.Cr.1981).

Wright v. State

531 P.2d 696 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1975

I reiterate my position with respect to Lamb v. Brown, supra, in that I believe that decision went to the jurisdiction of juvenile matters and therefore I believe it should be construed to be fully retroactive.

Hewitt v. State

53 Okla. Crim. 117 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1931

Moore v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 9 , 130 Pac. 517 . … The search warrant having been directed to him jointly with the other officers named, the holding of this court in the case of Dunn v. State, 40 Okla. Cr. 76 , 267 Pac. 279 , and Key v. State, 43 Okla.

Teague v. State

64 Okla. Crim. 369 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1938

They are: Smith v. State, 109 Ga. 479 , 35 S. E. 59 ; Hill v. Montgomery, 184 Ill. 220 , 56 N. E. 320 ; Troxdale v. State, 9 Humph., Tenn., 411; Adams v. Adams, 17 N. J. Eq. 324. … Anthony *380 v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 260 , 28 P.2d 1115 ; Chandler v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 254 , 105 P. 375 , 107 P. 735 ; Arms v. State, 49 Okla. Cr. 34 , 292 P. 76 , and cases cited therein; Potter v. State, 47 Okla.

Ex Parte Ellis

1 Okla. Crim. 125 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1908

This case is controlled by the decision in the case of Higgins v. … Brown (decided at this term of court and reported in this volume) 94 Pac. 703 , wherein it is held that an offense committed within the jurisdiction of the United States court of the Indian Territory, not of a federal character

Peters v. State

365 P.2d 174 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1961

In Brown v. … See Livingston v. State, Okl.Cr., 275 P.2d 1002 ; State v. Smith, Okl.Cr., 268 P.2d 587 ; State v. Kile, 96 Okl.Cr. 148 , 250 P.2d 233 ; McMichael v. State, 93 Okl.Cr. 341 , 228 P.2d 203 ; Thornton v.

Gilmore v. State

461 P.2d 992 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1969

In the case of Brown v. … In the case of Brown v.

Simpson v. State

707 P.2d 43 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 30, 1985

Harrall v. State, 674 P.2d 581 (Okl.Cr.1984). … The Oklahoma Board of Tests for Alcoholic and Drug Influence Rules and Regulations was *46 formerly entitled “Board of Chemical Tests for Alcoholic Influence.”

J. L. S. v. State

643 P.2d 328 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1982

When they returned they discovered that their home had been burglarized and that the property taken included the following: a .270 Belgium-made Browning gun; a Thompson Center Muzzle Loader, .50 caliber; a .22 Browning; a … Jones v. State, 555 P.2d 1061 (Okl.Cr.1976).” L. E. Y. v. State, (1982), 639 P.2d 1253 .

Butler v. State

60 Okla. Crim. 188 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1936

Newman, without his consent, one dark brown mare mule five years old and one dark brown horse mule four years old, said mules being then and there the property of said E. C. Newman. … In Dickson v. State, 28 Okla.

Nolte v. State

66 O.B.A.J. 47 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 27, 1994

See Howe v. State, 669 P.2d 780 (Okl.Cr.1983). … Appellant cites Harrison v.

McMullen v. State

548 P.2d 652 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1976

He stated that the vehicle was a brown 1960 Buick with a white top, bearing the license number ZN-8742. … See Pickens v. State, Okl.Cr., 450 P.2d 837 (1969); Harvell v. State, Okl.Cr., 395 P.2d 331 (1964).

Plotner v. State

721 P.2d 810 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1986

In Baier v. … . §§ 2241-2254 , the Court cited Carafas v.

Smith v. State

510 P.2d 30 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 2, 1973

He related that in his opinion, the bullet had been fired from the pistol received from Deputy Brown. … In Treadway v. State, Okl.Cr., 346 P.2d 953 , we stated: “* * * [A]n examination has been made of the record herein, and we find no prejudicial error entitling defendant to a reversal of this cause * * * Chambers v.

Kelly v. State

6 Okla. Crim. 175 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1911

Brown v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 442 , 106 Pac. 808 .

Butler v. State

545 P.2d 1298 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1976

See, Williams v. State, Okl.Cr., 373 P.2d 91 (1962). Defendant’s second assignment of error asserts the punishment is excessive. … See, Roberts v. State, Okl.Cr., 473 P.2d 264 (1970).