Case law

Dale v. State

449 P.2d 921 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1969

The early case of Lee v. State, 28 Okl.Cr. 397 , 231 P. 324 , while not dealing specifically with this issue, sheds some light on it. In Lee v. … In the light of Lee v.

Ellis v. State

76 P.3d 1131 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 2003

Bauman asked Appellant's stepmother, Valencia Brown, when Appellant had come home the night before. Mrs. Brown said she did not remember. Mrs. Brown then spoke to her husband on the phone, and Bauman overheard Mrs. … Rainey v.

Goodbarry v. State

50 Okla. Crim. 185 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1931

In Ricketts v. State, 23 Okla. … In Magee v.

Cryan v. State

583 P.2d 1122 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 24, 1978

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Board of Governors of Reg. Dentists of Okl. v. Burk, Okl., 551 P.2d 1122, 1124 (1976), held: “. . . … Thrasher v. Board of Governors, supra; Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth., Okl., 355 P.2d 1028 (1960). Our function is limited to the determination of the validity or invalidity of the Act.

Young v. State

29 Okla. Crim. 60 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1925

Zeke stood on the running board of the car. … O’Neal v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 386 , 188 P. 1092 ; Arnold v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 519 , 178 P. 897 ; Litchfield v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 173 , 126 P. 707 , 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 153; Gritts v. State, 6 Okla.

Richards v. State

569 P.2d 461 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 31, 1977

The Best Evidence Rule is stated in Hayes v. … Contu v. State, Okl.Cr., 533 P.2d 1000 (1975). Trantham v.

CRB v. State

638 P.2d 1130 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1982

Cooper v. State, 584 P.2d 234 (Okl.Cr. 1978). II. … Brown v. State, 518 P.2d 898 (Okl.Cr. 1974).

Davis v. State

916 P.2d 251 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1996

In Hanf v. … Valdez v. State, 900 P.2d 363, 389, n. 79 (Okl.Cr.1995); Hyatt v. State, 779 P.2d 993, 995 (Okl.Cr.1989); Holt v. State, 774 P.2d 476, 478 (Okl.Cr.1989); Jones v. State, 772 P.2d 922, 924-25 (Okl.Cr.1989); Drew v.

Bowen v. State

586 P.2d 67 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1978

In Brown v. … We note that the State in its brief relies on the following language from Draper v. State, Okl.Cr., 562 P.2d 155 (1977) and Branch v.

Harvey v. State

676 P.2d 865 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1984

The residence is composed of white colored wood with brown wood trim. The roof of the residence is light in color. The front of the residence faces East. … McCormick v. State, 388 P.2d 873 (Okl.Cr.1964).

Jones v. State

555 P.2d 63 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1976

Using the dicta from Robinson v. State, supra, as a foundation, a concurring opinion (on rehearing) in Brown v. State, 81 Okl.Cr. 303 , 166 P.2d 1021 (1946) cited Robinson v. … In Winter v. State, Okl.Cr., 368 P.2d 514 (1962), this Court cited the concurring opinion in Brown v.

Dunagan v. State

755 P.2d 102 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1988

Two men, in ski masks, were present at the scene, along with a brown, four-door Ford sedan. … See Driskell v. State, 659 P.2d 343 (Okl.Cr.1983); Blades v. State, 619 P.2d 875 (Okl.Cr.1980).

Miller v. State

579 P.2d 200 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 18, 1978

Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 481 P.2d 475 (1971). … Brown v. State, supra. Rather, there must be other facts shown from which it can be fairly inferred that the defendant had dominion and control over the seized substance.

Ex Parte Bailey

1 Okla. Crim. 115 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1908

Wilson v. People, 3 Colo. 325 ; Packer v. People, *119 8 Colo. 362 , 8 Pac. 564 ; State v. Carrington, 15 Utah 488 , 50 Pac. 526 : Higgins v. Brown et al., supra. … In Re Inerarity, Adm’r v.

Van Woudenberg v. State

68 O.B.A.J. 2343 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1997

VanWoundenberg v. … Brown v. State, 753 P.2d 908, 911 (Okl.Cr.1988), quoting United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 109-110, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2400 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976).

Ex Parte Burns

88 Okla. Crim. 270 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1949

Cr. 224 , 118 P. 155 ; School District No. 7 of Johnston County v. Cunningham, 51 Okla. 261 , 151 P. 633 ; James v. Board of County Commissioners of McCurtain County, 103 Okla. 141 , 229 P. 554 . … Wimpfheimer, 69 N.H. 166 , 38 A. 786 ; Commonwealth v. McNamara, 93 Pa. Super. 267 ; Jessee v. De Shong (Tex. Civ. App.) 105 S.W. 1011 ; State v. Prouty, 115 Iowa, 657 , 84 N.W. 670 ; Pratt v.

Harrell v. State

359 P.2d 610 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1961

In the later Texas case of Backues v. … State of North Carolina v.

State v. Madden

562 P.2d 1177 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1977

Brown, sitting without a jury on the 10th day of March, 1976. All evidence was presented at that time. … Judge Brown in his court minute of June 14th, 1976, reasoned as follows: “. . .

Gibson v. State

45 Okla. Crim. 412 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1929

In Blanck v. State, 14 Okla. … Brown v. State, 42 Okla. Cr. 11 , 273 Pac. 1018 . The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The instructions were fair to this defendant and substantially stated the law.

Lambert v. State

374 P.2d 783 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1962

In support of defendant’s first assignment of error, that the statute under which he stands convicted is void, the defendant relies upon Proctor v. … See Signs v. State, 35 Okl.Cr. 340 , 250 P. 938 .