Case law

Kitchens v. State

576 P.2d 775 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1978

All of these items were identified by Brown as being items taken in the burglary of the Southwestern Bell building on December 27. … In Harrell v.

Kitchens v. State

513 P.2d 1300 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 17, 1973

Tom Chaplin, Clerk of the Fanshawe School Board, identified State’s Exhibit 9 as the blank form used by the Board to pay Board obligations. Chaplin identified State’s Exhibit 2. … See Goodwin v. State, Okl.Cr., 506 P.2d 571 .

Harrell v. State

359 P.2d 610 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1961

In the later Texas case of Backues v. … State of North Carolina v.

Lamer v. State

508 P.2d 665 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1973

. *668 For ■ this contention, defendant relies mainly on Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 481 P. 2d 475 (1971). … The defendant also cites Osburn v.

Williams v. State

450 P.2d 232 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1969

The police records of the City of Ardmore do not indicate that Petitioner was held as a parole violator or under an order of the Pardon and Parole Board. In Wiley v. … In Ingram v. Page, Okl.Cr.App., 446 P.2d 616 , the Petitioner who was on parole from the penitentiary was arrested and taken into custody on a traffic charge and for parole violation.

Ex Parte Robinson

56 Okla. Crim. 404 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1935

Cr. 634 , 185 Pac. 831 ; Browning v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 373 , 239 Pac. 272 ; Ables v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 26 , 247 Pac. 423 ; Neff v. State, 39 Okla. Cr. 133 , 264 Pac. 649 . … Wines v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 450 , 124 Pac. 466 ; Robbins v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 294 , 155 Pac. 491 ; Browning v. State, supra; Stamper v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 324 , 220 Pac. 67 .

Bayless v. State

350 P.2d 520 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1960

In considering this contention the court is bound by the rule heretofore adopted by this Court which is well stated in the case of Hubbard v. … This court is bound by the rule laid down in the case of Bundy v.

Jones v. State

492 P.2d 1104 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 29, 1971

SIMMS, Judge (specially concurring) : Careful study of the record in the instant case indicates it to be clearly distinguishable on a factual basis from the cases of Riggs v. … State, Okl.Cr., 486 P.2d 643 (1971), and Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 481 P.2d 475 (1971).

Dale v. State

449 P.2d 921 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1969

The early case of Lee v. State, 28 Okl.Cr. 397 , 231 P. 324 , while not dealing specifically with this issue, sheds some light on it. In Lee v. … In the light of Lee v.

Goodbarry v. State

50 Okla. Crim. 185 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1931

In Ricketts v. State, 23 Okla. … In Magee v.

Shilkett v. State

29 Okla. Crim. 17 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1925

Barmore v. Robertson, 302 Ill. 422 , 134 N. E. 815 , 22 A. L. R. 835. … The statute, by inference at least, gives the state board of health power to make and enforce reasonable regulations ; but there is no allegation in the information that the board of health promulgated any rules relative

Smith v. State of Oklahoma

452 P.2d 819 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1969

Smith’s brother, whose name was Brown. Then Sorg took the defendant, defendant’s wife, and Brown, first to the Planet Motel, which was full, then to the Holiday Inn. … This Court repeats its finding in Williams v.

Cantrell v. State

12 Okla. Crim. 534 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1916

In Kirk et al. v. The State, 11 Okla. … Knode v. Williamson, 17 Wall. 586 , 21 L. ED. 670.

Battle v. State

515 P.2d 269 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1973

Brown, and requested an additional twenty-four (24) hours within which to plead. … With regard to detention for some two days before being brought before a magistrate, defendant did not allege prejudice arising therefrom as required under Grimes v. State, Okl.Cr., 512 P.2d 231 (1973) and Brown v.

Wallace v. State

620 P.2d 410 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1980

He took a small brown paper bag containing jewelry and fled from the house. Prosecutrix immediately contacted the police and gave a description of her attacker. … See Morgan v. State, Okl.Cr., 569 P.2d 474 (1977).

Dyle v. State

664 P.2d 1047 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 24, 1983

United States v. Saldana, 453 F.2d 352 (10th Cir.1972); Mason v. State, 603 P.2d 1146 (Okl.Cr.1979); Prock v. State, 542 P.2d 522 (Okl.Cr.1975). … . *1050 Davis v. State, supra; Reynolds v. State, 511 P.2d 1145 (Okl.Cr.1973).

Miles v. State

41 Okla. Crim. 283 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 24, 1928

Cr. 369 , 177 P. 122 ; Love v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 1 , 150 P. 913 . … Roddie v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 63 , 198 P. 342 .

Doyle v. State

759 P.2d 223 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 11, 1988

Miller , at 202; Sturgeon v. State, 483 P.2d 335, 338 (Okla.Crim.App.1971); Brown v. State, 481 P.2d 475, 477-78 (Okla.Crim.App.1971). Guilty knowledge and control cannot be presumed. … Hishaw v. State, 568 P.2d 643, 645 (Okla.Crim.App.1977); Brown , at 477-78.

Miller v. State

579 P.2d 200 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 18, 1978

Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 481 P.2d 475 (1971). … Brown v. State, supra. Rather, there must be other facts shown from which it can be fairly inferred that the defendant had dominion and control over the seized substance.

Gibson v. State

45 Okla. Crim. 412 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1929

In Blanck v. State, 14 Okla. … Brown v. State, 42 Okla. Cr. 11 , 273 Pac. 1018 . The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The instructions were fair to this defendant and substantially stated the law.