Case law

Ex Parte Garland Brown

6 Okla. Crim. 134 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1911

In the case of Wychoff v. … See, also, Evans v. State, infra, 116 Pac. 356 ; Kester v. State, infra, 116 Pac. 356 ; Meek v. State, infra, 116 Pac. 356 .

Hisel v. State

97 Okla. Crim. 356 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1953

In Thompson v. … State v. Stegall, 96 Okla. Cr. 281 , 253 P. 2d 183 ; Delano v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 258 , 168 P. 2d 659 .

Isom v. State

646 P.2d 1288 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1982

The appellant cites Lovell v. State, 455 P.2d 735 (Okl.Cr.1969) and Harris v. … There is ample evidence to support a finding that the appellant was driving while intoxicated at the time of the accident. *1293 The appellant argues that Brown v. State, 584 P.2d 231 (Okl.Cr.1978) and Winter v.

Phenis v. State

28 Okla. Crim. 142 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1924

Bennett v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 27 , 204 Pac. 462 ; Douglas v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 648 , 179 Pac. 947 ; Williams v. Ter., 13 Ariz. 27 , 108 Pac. 243 , 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1032. … Taylor v. Ter., 2 Okla. Cr. 1 , 99 Pac. 628 ; Fuller v. Ter., 2 Okla. Cr. 86 , 99 Pac. 1098 ; Helsey v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 98 , 193 Pac. 50 , 17 A. L. R. 197; State v. Miller, 47 Or. 562 , 85 Pac. 81 , 6 L. R. A. (N.

Ex Parte Hibbs

86 Okla. Crim. 113 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1948

Kennedy v. State, 66 Okla. Cr. 318 , 92 P. 2d 384 ; Abby v. State, 72 Okla. Cr. 208 , 114 P. 2d 499 , 115 P. 2d 266 ; Kidd v. State, 76 Okla. Cr. 213 , 136 P. 2d 210 ; Murphy v. State, 72 Okla. … Cr. 1 , 112 P. 2d 438 ; Mannon v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 267 , 93 P. 2d 73 ; Cunningham v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 131 , 105 P. 2d 264 ; and Lewis Grayson v. State, 85 Okla. Cr. 266 , 188 P. 2d 696 .

Reddell v. State

14 Okla. Crim. 199 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1918

State v. Lawrence, 9. Okla. Cr. 16, 130 Pac. 508 . The question naturally arises: What was the intent and purpose of the foregoing statutes? … Does that mean just any person related-by affinity or consanguinity within the third degree to the officer *202 or board or commission, where such officer or board appoints said person to any office or employment within his

Petition of Leaser

89 Okla. Crim. 351 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1949

McDaniel v. Turner, Sheriff, 84 Okla. Cr. 247 , 181 P. 2d 296 . … A report of this examination should be made to the Pardon and Parole Board by the Pardon and Parole Officer for consideration by the Board, and recommendation to the Governor.

Sutton v. State

634 P.2d 205 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1981

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). In North Carolina v. … Brown v. Ohio, supra. In Bowen v. State, 586 P.2d 67 (Okl.Cr.1978), this Court was presented with an identical fact situation.

Sleeper v. State

71 Okla. Crim. 136 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1941

Elmer Young v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 112 , 108 P. 2d 1028 ; Nott v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 432 , 107 P. 2d 366 ; Barfield v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 455 , 99 P. 2d 544 ; Matthews v. State, 67 Okla. … Counsel for defendant, in anticipation of the position to be talien by the state in this case, cites the cases of Brown v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 115 , 167 P. 762 ; Price v. State, 1 Okla.

Rogers v. State

85 Okla. Crim. 116 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1947

In Hart v. State, 57 Okla. … In the case of Hopper v. State, 81 Okla.

Winter v. Corporation Commission

660 P.2d 145 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1983

National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166 (Okl.1973); El Paso Natural Gas v. … Association v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, 266 P.2d 633 (Okl.1954); Ward v. Corporation Commission, 470 P.2d 993 (Okl.1970). . Roberts v. Roberts, 357 P.2d 980 (Okl.1961); Martin v. Harrah Ind.

Hines v. State

640 P.2d 1385 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1982

State v. Greenwood, 565 P.2d 701 (Okl.Cr.1977); and Blackburn v. State, 575 P.2d 638 (Okl.Cr.1978). On August 21, 1981, the evidentiary hearing was heard by the district court, and the motion to suppress was denied. … What did you do with this brown sack? A. The brown sack was labeled. I took it in, 1 labeled it. I placed it in the evidence locker that night.

Fulkerson v. State

17 Okla. Crim. 103 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1920

Walker v. State, 117 Ala. 42 , 23 South. 149 ; Weimer v. People, 186 Ill. 503 , 58 N. E. 378 ; Bolen v. State, 51 Neb. 581 , 71 N. W. 444 ; Goodwyn v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 64 S. W. 251 ; State v. … State v. Krug, 12 Wash. 288 , 41 Pac. 126 ; Bartley v. State, 53 Neb. 310 , 73 N. W. 744 ; Bork v. People, 16 Hun (N. Y.) 476; People v. McKinney, 10 Mich. 54 . Contra, Carr v. State, 104 Ala. 43 , 16 South. 155 .

McCluskey v. State

372 P.2d 623 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1962

Wood v. State, Okl.Cr., 321 P.2d 391 , and Tipton v. State, Okl.Cr., 308 P.2d 670 . … In further support of the above assignment of error, the defendant cites Ex parte Cannis, 83 Okl.Cr. 113 , 173 P.2d 586 , and Brown v.

Allen v. State

557 P.2d 1158 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1976

In Yarbrough v. … In Rutherford v.

Edmondson v. State

532 P.2d 81 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1975

Stidham v. State, Okl.Cr., 507 P.2d 1312 . … Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 , 92 S.Ct. 1056 , 31 L.Ed.2d 340 . Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 .

Hilliary v. State

630 P.2d 791 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1981

See Williams v. State, 565 P.2d 46 (Okl.Cr.1977). … LeBlanc, Deputy Clerk (Defendant’s Exhibit 22) Notice: Due to weather conditions the Board of Trustees will not meet on Thursday, January 11th, 1979. V.

Byford v. State

90 Okla. Crim. 230 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1949

Brown, chief of detectives, Oklahoma Police Department. Mr. … A. 1941, and Clark v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 423 , 149 P. 2d 994 ; Tripp v. State, supra; McAfee v. State, supra, and Miles v. State, supra. Thereafter, on trial, neither of the defendants testified.

Hudson v. State

525 P.2d 1380 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 21, 1974

Defendant, in his first proposition, argues the case of Fugett v. … See Ferguson v. State, Okl.Cr., 489 P.2d 523 (1971).

McDoulett v. State

685 P.2d 978 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1984

Following the offense, C.F. described her assailant as a white male of medium build with brown curly hair and a scarred, pockmarked face. … Appellant does have brown curly hair and complexion scars, but he is 5'8" tall and usually weighs between 127 and 130 pounds.