Case law

Shaw v. State

303 P.2d 986 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1956

Proctor v. Territory, 18 Okl. 378 , 92 P. 389 ; Brown v. State, 5 Okl.Cr. 41 , 113 P. 219 ; Johnson v. State, 10 Okl.Cr. 597 , 140 P. 622 ; Drake v. State, 91 Okl.Cr. 142 , 217 P.2d 191 . … While the crime of gambling may be proven as any other crime by circumstantial evidence, McCarty v. State, 21 Okl.Cr. 365 , 207 P. 1069 ; Rush v. State, 22 Okl. Cr. 126, 210 P. 316 ; Crosby v.

OLVERA v. STATE

2024 OK CR 28 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 2024

Wong Sun v. United States , 371 U.S. 471, 486 (1963). See also Matthews v. State , 1998 OK CR 3 953 P.2d 336 Brown v. Illinois , 422 U.S. 590, 599 (1975). The U.S. … State , 2006 OK CR 34 142 P.3d 437 Mason v. State , 2018 OK CR 37 433 P.3d 1264 Mitchell v. State , 2018 OK CR 24 424 P.3d 677 McDaniel v. Brown , 558 U.S. 120, 130-31 (2010).

Leach v. State

95 Okla. Crim. 237 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1952

In this connection see Brown v. State, 89 Okla. Okla. … Brown v. State, supra; Sparks v. State, 72 Okla. Cr. 283 , 115 P. 2d 277 . Here we find the information sufficient and unchallenged by demurrer.

Smith v. State

368 P.2d 246 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1962

He identified Benny Brown as one of the men he took up. … In Plemons v.

Braught v. State

17 Okla. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1919

Co. v. … In Brown v. State, 9 Okla.

MUSONDA v. STATE

435 P.3d 694 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 2019

State , 2010 OK CR 7, ¶ 41, 231 P.3d 1156, 1169-70 (claim is waived for failure to cite the applicable portion of the record); Stouffer v. State, 2006 OK CR 46, ¶ 126, 147 P.3d 245, 270-71 (same); Brown v. … STATE Discussed 1997 OK CR 1, 933 P.2d 316, Brown v. State Discussed at Length Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 1985 OK 35, 702 P.2d 360, 56 OBJ 1032, Ellison v. Gray Discussed Title 20.

Marr v. State

558 P.2d 1176 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1977

Brown. . . . ” [Tr. 17] Under such circumstances we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s Motion for a Change of Venue. See Sam v. State, Okl. Cr., 510 P.2d 978 (1973). … See Gonzales v. State, Okl.Cr., 480 P.2d 930 (1972). We, therefore, find this assignment of error to be without merit.

Bailey v. State

494 P.2d 1252 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1972

At the revocation hearing, Lozier Brown testified that he was employed as an officer of the Department of Corrections and that the defendant was assigned to him on May 4, 1970. … On May 7, 1970, the defendant appeared at Brown’s office and they went over the rules and regulations of probation. On June 4, 1970, defendant made the May report; on July 14, he made the June report.

Fogle v. State

67 Okla. Crim. 146 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1939

Brown, “His Attorneys.” On September 28th the motion to dismiss was submitted. … Hancock v. State, 57 Okla. Cr. 329 , 48 P. 2d 348 ; McDessey v. State, 61 Okla. Cr. 345 , 68 P. 2d 113 .

Johnson v. State

550 P.2d 984 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1976

In the case of Pickens v. … This Court stated in Anderson v.

State v. MAL

765 P.2d 787 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1988

Brown then called the Sand Springs Police Department, and Sergeant Harold arrived at the school later that day. Sergeant Harold sat in Mr. Brown's office while Mr. … Lee v. State, 561 P.2d 566, 569 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977).This is true because confessions by juveniles are more suspect than those of adults. J.D. and D.R.D. v. State, 558 P.2d 402, 405 (Okla. Crim. App. 1976).

Wald v. State

513 P.2d 330 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 1, 1973

Washington v. State, Okl.Cr., 426 P.2d 372 (1967). … Therefore we find this case falls within the rule set forth in Holt v.

Nelson v. State

755 P.2d 684 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1988

Based on this information, the police obtained a warrant and arrested Brown. In exchange for a suspended sentence, Matthews testified against Brown and appellant at trial. … Freeman v. State, 721 P.2d 1331 (Okl.Cr.1986); Scott v. State, 674 P.2d 54 (Okl.Cr.1984).

State v. Sandfer

93 Okla. Crim. 228 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1951

the board. … In Davis v.

Ex Parte Jackson

45 Okla. Crim. 448 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1930

Brown, in which he claims to be the owner of certain lands in Seminole county, and contracts with said Wilder and Brown to *450 secure evidence for and to establish his title. … See Egan v. Knewel (D. C.) 298 F. 784 ; Ex parte Brinkman, 93 W. Va. 351 , 116 S. E. 757 ; Scott and Roe, Habeas Corpus, 290.

Carmickle v. State

45 Okla. Crim. 370 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1929

Browning v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 373 , 239 Pac. 272 ; Wilson v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 139 , 240 Pac. 155 ; Shields v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 344 , 240 Pac. 661 . … In the case of Hubbard v.

Crabtree v. State

18 Okla. Crim. 125 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1920

In Wilcox et al. v. U. S., 7 Ind. T. 86 , 103 S. … Brown v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 Pac. 359 .

Wilson v. State

38 Okla. Crim. 409 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1928

Wingfield v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 342 , 244 P. 53 . … Smith v. State, 34 Okla. Cr. 434 , 246 P. 1109 ; Hancock v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 96 , 248 P. 1115 ; Whitford v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 187 , 249 P. 430 ; Shockley v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 437 , 251 P. 514 ; Jones v.

STATE v. HODGES

2020 OK CR 2 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 2020

In this proposition, the State also appears to argue that Section 759 and the Board of Test rules conflict with the rules of evidence regarding expert testimony under 12 O.S.2011, § 2702 and Taylor v. … STATE Discussed 1974 OK CR 151, 525 P.2d 1359, WESTERMAN v. STATE Discussed 2014 OK CR 14, 334 P.3d 953, STATE v. TERRY Discussed 2016 OK CR 26, 387 P.3d 951, STATE v.

Dupree v. State

514 P.2d 425 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1973

Lorraine Brown’s testimony did not differ substantially from that of her husband’s. … Well, let’s don’t hold it against them too much for committing perjury . . . ” (Tr. 191) In dealing with a similar proposition in the recent case of Ray v.