Case law

Bowman v. State

585 P.2d 1373 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1978

In Broadway v. … In Harris v.

Yarbrough v. State

291 P.2d 369 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1955

Defendant and Nor-val Brown had lived in the same town and had come to Oklahoma City together. … Thompson v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 253 , 261 P.2d 900 ; McNutt v. State, Okl.Cr., 288 P.2d 418 . However, the court properly refused to give the requested instruction.

Griffin v. State

490 P.2d 1387 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1971

In Harris v. … Grant v. State, Okl.Cr., 385 P.2d 925 (1963).

Chaney v. State

612 P.2d 269 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 15, 1980

Brown is still pending. In his first and seventeenth assignments of error, the defendant complains that a prospective juror was excused for cause in violation of Witherspoon v. … Brown’s body were introduced.

Wofford v. State

646 P.2d 1300 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1982

See Williams v. State, 628 P.2d 369 (Okl.Cr.1981). … Severn v. State, 72 Okl.Cr. 141 , 114 P.2d 181 (1941).

Flores v. State

71 O.B.A.J. 137 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 29, 1999

Holbird v. State, 1982 OK CR 130, ¶ 24 , 650 P.2d 66, 70 . In this case there are sufficient intervening factors to purge any taint originating from the actions of officer Goree. See Brown v. … See Le v.

Wood v. State

514 P.2d 671 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1973

Turner v. State, Okl.Cr., 479 P.2d 631 . The final proposition contends that the punishment is excessive. We are of the opinion that this proposition is well taken. … In Ellison v.

Sledge v. State

40 Okla. Crim. 421 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1928

Irwin v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 301 , 146 P. 453 . In the case of Smith v. State, 19 Okla. … State v. Rule, 11 Okla. Cr. 237 , 144 P. 807 ; Herndon v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 586 , 185 P. 701 ; Austin v. State, 28 Okla. Cr. 73 , 228 P. 1113 .

Thompson v. State

724 P.2d 780 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 29, 1986

Brown telephoned the sheriff, but the men left soon after they realized the Browns were home and witnessing the fray. It was too dark for the Browns to identify any of the men. … Finally, appellant, relying on Ake v.

Ruhm v. State

496 P.2d 809 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1972

The lone authority cited is Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 481 P.2d 475 (1971). … Both Brown, supra, and the case relied upon by the state, Hulsey v. State, Okl.Cr., 307 P.2d 553 (1957) stand for the proposition that fact situations are fact questions for the jury.

In Re the Habeas Corpus of Wells

335 P.2d 358 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1959

See also State v. Nealy, 50 Okl.Cr. 63 , 296 P. 510 , and see from this court Brown v. … Co. v. Cupp, 177 Okl. 102 , 57 P.2d 852 . And see Board of Water Engineers of State of Texas v. City of San Antonio, 155 Tex. 111 , 283 S.W.2d 722 ; Ex parte Masters, 126 Okl. 80 , 258 P. 861 ; Pottawatomie County v.

Osburn v. State

497 P.2d 471 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 10, 1972

Defendant also asserts that the trial court should have sustained his demurrer to the evidence. *474 In the companion case, Brown v. … See: Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 481 P.2d 475 (1971); and Reser v. State, Okl.Cr., 488 P.2d 929 (1971).

Muldrow v. State

16 Okla. Crim. 549 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1919

Williams v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 373 , 118 Pac. 1006 . In our judgment the preliminary complaint in this case was insufficient to charge an offense. … Williams v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 373 , 118 Pac. 1006 .

Clasby v. State

78 Okla. Crim. 45 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1943

That it was on the drain board of the sink. … Cr. 203 , 93 P.2d 549 ; Nott v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 432 , 107 P.2d 366 ; Mitchell v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 184 , 119 P.2d 99 ; Sims v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 321 , 121 P.2d 317 ; Brown v. State, 74 Okla.

Grayson v. State

12 Okla. Crim. 226 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1916

Colbert v. The State, 4th Okla. Cr. 500, 113 Pac. 588 ; Starr v. The State, 9th Okla. Cr. 210, 131 Pac. 542 . … Holmes v. State, 6th Okla. Cr. 541, 119 Pac. 430 , 120 Pac. 300 ; Wishard v. The State, 5th Okla. Cr. 610, 115 Pac. 796 ; And see State v. Pratt, 121 Mo. 566 , 26 S. W. 556 ; Scott v. State, 30 Ala. 503 .

Roebuck v. State

14 Okla. Crim. 241 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1918

In Tucker v. State, 8 Okla. … think that it was never contemplated that the information should charge the crime in the same language,, or word for word as charged in the preliminary complaint filed before the committing magistrate,” *249 In Ponosky v.

Forester v. State

36 Okla. Crim. 111 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1927

Horton v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 294 , 136 P. 177 . In Elkins v. State, 29 Okla. … Muldrow v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 549 , 185 P. 332 . In Brown v. State, 9 Okla.

James v. State

736 P.2d 541 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1987

Cooper v. State, 584 P.2d 234 (Okl.Cr.1978). The appellant cites Murray v. … See Banks v. State, supra; Robison v. State, 677 P.2d 1080 (Okl.Cr.1984); Dutton v. State, 674 P.2d 1134 (Okl.Cr.1984); Stafford v. State, 669 P.2d 285 (Okl.Cr.1983); Coleman v.

Bayouth v. State

294 P.2d 856 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1956

Co. v. Rose, 196 Old. 592, 166 P.2d 1011, 1014 ; Atchley v. Board of Barber Examiners of State, 208 Old. 453, 257 P.2d 302 ; Ex parte Haley, 202 Old. 101, 210 P.2d 653 , 12 A.L.R.2d 416 and note; Brown v. … In Brown v. State, supra, [ 266 P.2d 990 ], in the body of the opinion we said: “And of course where the body is broader than the title, then the Act is unconstitutional as to such provisions.

Ex Parte Swain

88 Okla. Crim. 235 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1949

Wilbur Brown and J. F. Wolf. … statute, then said statute would certainly be unconstitutional as attempting to confer on courts of record a power which is vested exclusively in the Chief Executive subject to the recommendation of the pardon and parole board