Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,434 results
0.65s
63 O.B.A.J. 3659 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1992
See Cupp v. … Brown, 860 F.2d 1545 (10th Cir.1988). Since appellant filed his brief, the United States Supreme Court has reversed the holding in Parks v. Brown on this issue in Saffle v.
Cited 39 timesPublished56 Okla. Crim. 454 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1935
In Cherry v. State, 33 Okla. … In Horton v. State, 10 Okla.
Cited 11 timesPublished71 O.B.A.J. 1304 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 16, 2000
Omalza v. … Bryson v.
Cited 103 timesPublished544 P.2d 545 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1975
State v. Frisbee [sic], 8 Okl.Cr. 406 , 127 P. 1091 ; State v. Rule, 11 Okl.Cr. 237 , 144 P. 807 ; State v. Vaughn, 15 Okl.Cr. 187 , 175 P. 731 ; State v. Tibbetts, 21 Okl.Cr. 168 , 205 P. 776 ; State v. … State v. Clifton, 2 Okl.Cr. 189 , 100 P. 1124 (1909) ; State v. Pollock, 5 Okl.Cr. 26 , 113 P. 207 (1911) ; State v. Brown, 8 Okl.Cr. 40 , 126 P. 245 (1912) ; State v.
Overruled by State v. Young, 65 O.B.A.J. 1571 (1994)Cited 23 timesPublished94 Okla. Crim. 391 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1951
See, also, Bohot v. State, 89 Okla. Cr. 454 , 210 P. 2d 379 ; Scott v. State, 80 Okla. Cr. 259 , 158 P. 2d 728 ; Albrecht v. State, 72 Okla. Cr. 270 , 115 P. 2d 274 ; Ashcraft v. State, 68 Okla. … Cr. 308 , 98 P. 2d 60 ; Odom v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 117 , 95 P. 2d 916 ; Bayouth v. State, 40 Okla. Cr. 160 , 267 P. 687 .
Cited 3 timesPublished558 P.2d 1179 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1977
In Samples v. … In Cooper v.
Cited 9 timesPublished734 P.2d 820 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1987
V. … Smith v. State, 695 P.2d 1360 (Okl.Cr.1985); and Brown v. State, 578 P.2d 364 (Okl.Cr.1978). The other facts and circumstances, however, may be simply that the defendant has a somewhat unusual name. Louder v.
Cited 11 timesPublished360 P.3d 1194 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 2015
See Board of Trustees of State University of N.Y. v. … NAACP v.
Cited 11 timesPublished297 P.2d 585 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 16, 1956
Griffin v. State, supra; Addington v. State, supra. … Then came Hannan v.
Cited 8 timesPublished63 O.B.A.J. 1946 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1992
As was the case in Ross v. … Id. quoting Brown v. State, 743 P.2d 133, 136 (Okl.Cr. 1987).
Cited 7 timesPublished11 Okla. Crim. 270 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1915
made a memorandum of the woman’s age, maiden name, number of children, and place and date of birth; the woman gave her name as Harris; maiden name as Eva Baker; age 26 years; that the memorandum is on file at the state board … In Kitchens v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 603 , 140 Pac. 619 , it is said: “In a prosecution for adultery, positive evidence of the direct fact is not required.
Cited 2 timesPublished341 P.2d 284 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1959
Short v. … Zimmerman v. State, 130 Neb. 269 , 264 N.W. 668 ; Wilson v. State, 130 Neb. 752 , 266 N.W. 614 ; In re Aipperspach, 63 N.D. 358 , 248 N.W. 488 ; cases involving the identical question. See also Manning v.
Cited 6 timesPublished25 Okla. Crim. 330 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1923
It appears that one bullet passed through the second board from the top of the gate. It entered from the outside and ranged down. … State, 31 Ind. 418 ; Board v. O’Conner, 137 Ind. 622 ; State v. Boyd, 38 La. Ann. 374 ; Davis v. State, 38 Md. 15 ; People v. Rector, 19 Wend. (N. Y.) 583; Isler v. Demy, 71 N. C. 14 ; Burrell v.
Cited 18 timesPublished690 P.2d 463 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1984
Chaney v. State, 612 P.2d 269 (Okl.Cr.1980), modified on other grounds, sub. nom., Chaney v. Brown, 730 F.2d 1334 (10th Cir.1984). This assignment of error is without merit. VIII. … State, 617 P.2d 223 (Okl.Cr.1980); and, Chaney v. State, 612 P.2d 269 (Okl.Cr.1980), modified on other grounds, sub. nom., Chaney v. Brown, 730 F.2d 1334 (10th Cir.1984). . Tobler v.
Cited 47 timesPublished146 P.3d 1149 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 2006
Seq, eg., Brown v. State, 1998 OK CR 77, ¶10 , 989 P.2d 918 , 921 (issue decided in extraordinary writ appeal before trial would not be reviewed on direct appeal based on collateral estoppel); Wilson v. … Brown v. Sanders, 546 U.S. 212 , 126 S.Ct. 884, 892 , 163 L.Ed.2d 723 (2006).
Cited 39 timesPublished3 Okla. Crim. 159 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1909
State v. Campbell, 59 Kan. 246 , 52 Pac. 455 ; Laycock v. State, 136 Ind. 217 , 36 N. E. 137 . … Ex parte Lyda Howland, ante, p. 142, 104 Pac. 927 ; Ex parte Curlee, 30 Okla. 192 , 95 Pac. 414 ; Higgins v. Brown, 20 Okla. 355 ( 1 Okla. Cr. 33 ), 94 Pac. 703 ; Packer v.
Cited 8 timesPublished3 Okla. Crim. 621 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1909
Herler v. State, 7 Tex. 70 ; Davidson v. State, 33 Tex. 248 ; Dansly v. State, 34 Tex. 393 . Gibbs v. State, 1 Tex. App. 12-19; Hauck v. State, 1 Tex. App. 357-360; Thompson v. State, 2 Tex. App. 289; Terry v. … App. 236-239; Higginbotham v. State, 3 Tex. App. 447-450; Love v. State, 3 Tex. App. 501; Boothe v. State, 4 Tex. App. 202; Watson v. State, 5 Tex. App. 11-29; Tooney v. State, 5 Tex. App. 163-185; Brown v.
Cited 11 timesPublished97 Okla. Crim. 255 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1953
Powell v. State, 94 Okla. Cr. 1 , 229 P. 2d 230 ; Smith v. State, 90 Okla. … VI, § 10, Oklahoma Constitution, gives the Governor power on recommendation of the majority of the Pardon and Parole Board to grant commutations. We have no such power. In Hancock v. State, 90 Okla.
Cited 5 timesPublished560 P.2d 1019 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 24, 1977
Defendant cites as authority Buchanan v. State, Okl.Cr., 523 P.2d 1134 (1974) and Brown v. … In Miles v.
Cited 3 timesPublished539 P.2d 1380 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1975
In support of this assertion, the defendant cites Spencer v. … See, Allen v. State, Okl.Cr., 507 P.2d 606 (1973). We find no such abuse of discretion in the instant case.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna