Case law

Gransbury v. State

64 Okla. Crim. 408 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1938

Cr. 316 , 127 P. 707 ; Brown v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 343 , *416 156 P. 1150 . … Heusack, 189 Mo. 295 , 88 S.W. 21 ; State v. Sharpless, 212 Mo. 176 , 111 S.W. 69 ; Brown v. State, 74 Tex. Cr. R. 356 , 169 S.W. 437 ; Porch v. State, 50 Tex. Cr. R. 335 , 99 S.W. 102 .

Loveless Et Ux. v. State

43 Okla. Crim. 146 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 18, 1929

In Duncan v. State, 11 Okla. … In Duncan v.

Uhles v. State

94 Okla. Crim. 167 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 29, 1951

The card-board boxes were ordinary whisky boxes. … See, also, Farmer v. State, 86 Okla. Cr. 308 , 192 P. 2d 716 ; Franklin v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 115 , 109 P. 2d 239 , and Griffin v. State, Okla. Cr. 210 P. 2d 671 .

Valdez v. State

18 Okla. Crim. 204 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1921

Crenshaw, in rebuttal, testified that Peter Crus began boarding with him in August and continued until he was arrested; that the brown hat offered in evidence was similar to the one worn by Peter Crus when he went to work … Holmes v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 542 , 119 Pac. 430 . “The least degree of concert of action or collusion makes the act of one conspirator the act of all.” Ex parte Hayes, 6 Okla. Cr. 321 , 118 Pac. 609 .

Ex Parte Barber

87 Okla. Crim. 201 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1948

See, also, Higgins v. Brown [ 1 Okla. Cr. 33 , 94 P. 703 ], and authorities therein cited. … See to the same effect, Higgins v. Brown, 1 Okla.

Campbell v. State

651 P.2d 696 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1982

Campbell and Brown had planned their activities prior to the actions by the police. … The unnamed items seized were laboratory equipment, chemistry books and chemistry formula notes all taken from Brown’s residence. Marron v.

In re the Habeas Corpus of Hibbs

322 P.2d 654 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1958

This is, of course, a long sentence, but the Legislature of this state in 1943, 1945 and 1947 created a pardon and parole board, and one of the duties of this board is to make recommendations to the Governor of the State … Cr., 284 P.2d 755 ; In re Brown, Okl.Cr.,, 305 P.2d 593 ; In re Boyd, Okl.Cr., 302 P.2d 494 . The writ is therefore denied.

Ex Parte Broyles

84 Okla. Crim. 47 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1947

Broyles v. State, 83 Okla. Cr. 83 , 173 P. 2d 235 . … Roscoe Brown was called as a witness by counsel for petitioner.

State v. Ockershauser

67 O.B.A.J. 2588 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 1996

See Courange v. State, 510 P.2d 961, 962 (Okl.Cr.1973); 74 O.S.1971, § 360.13. … In Brown v.

Griffin v. State

90 Okla. Crim. 90 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1949

He further testified that he did not see any whisky bottles, that the card-board box was sealed, and that after the arrest they found a second card-board box of liquor in the defendant’s car. … In Farmer v. State, 86 Okla.

Williams v. State

648 P.2d 843 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1982

She also stated that the suspect was wearing sunglasses, a brown hat and a brown leather coat. The only apparent discrepancy was that Williams actually had a beard. … Further, in Brown v. State, 384 P.2d 54 (Okl.Cr.1963), we stated that the ultimate test of admissibility of confessions is a test of voluntariness.

Kennedy v. State

640 P.2d 971 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1982

He is a diplómate of the American Board of Oral Pathology. Dr. … As Brown was walking toward his own room, he saw the man and girl enter Room 207, which was almost directly across from Brown’s room.

Boswell v. State

36 Okla. Crim. 265 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1927

Brown claim to have gone to the home and, acting under the authority of the search warrant, claim to have searched the house of the de *267 fendant and found therein a small quantity of whisky, between a half gallon and a … Reinhart et al. v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 109 , 240 P. 1’9; Terry et al. v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 91 , 237 P. 465 ; Hallmark v. State, 36 Okla. Cr. 236 , 253 P. 513 .

Gilreath v. State

627 P.2d 443 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1981

In Carroll v. … Brown v. State, 481 P.2d 475 (Okl.Cr.1971). The aforementioned independent factors sufficiently establish that the appellant exercised dominion and control over the contraband.

Savage v. State

304 P.2d 344 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1956

See cases cited in Beasley v. State, Okl.Cr., 282 P.2d 249, 251 ; and generally see 86 A.L.R. pp. 264, 269; 15 Am.Jur. p. 24, § 335; Warren v. State, 1926, 35 Okl.Cr. 430 , 251 P. 101 ; Rider v. … Landon v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 336 , 166 P.2d 781 ; Ratcliff v. State, Okl.Cr., 289 P.2d 152 ; Coats v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 217 , 212 P.2d 141 , 214 P.2d 455 .

Wright v. State

617 P.2d 1354 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1979

Brown v. State, 52 Okl.Cr. 307 , 4 P.2d 129 (1931). In closing argument, reasonable inferences may be drawn. … In Haughey v.

Smith v. State

489 P.2d 1086 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1971

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge: Albert Brown Smith, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried, and convicted in the District Court of Oklahoma County for the offense of Carrying a Pistol, After Former Conviction of … Jones v. State, Okl.Cr., 468 P.2d 805 (1970). The final proposition contends that the punishment is excessive.

Ex Parte Woodruff

90 Okla. Crim. 59 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1949

See, also, Rush v. Brown, 187 Okla. 97 , 101 P. 2d 262 ; Bailey v. State Board of Public Affairs et al., 194 Okla. 495 , 153 P. 2d 235 ; and Gibbons v. Missouri K. & T. R. Co. et al., 142 Okla. 146 , 285 P. 1040 . … W. 891 , and particularly in a late Ohio case involving the public health, and being Weber v. Board of Health, Butler County, et al., 1947, 148 Ohio St. 389 , 74 N.

Ex Parte Ridley

3 Okla. Crim. 350 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1910

People v. Brown, 54 Mich. 15 , 19 N. W. 571 ; People v. Moore, 62 Mich. 496 , 29 N. W. 80 ; *356 People v. Cummings, 88 Mich. 249 , 50 N. W. 310 , 14 L. R. A. 285; U. S. v. Wilson, 7 Pet. 150 , 8 L. … S. v.

State v. Patton

63 O.B.A.J. 2512 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1992

Quinn v. City of Tulsa, 111 P.2d 1331, 1339 (Okl.1989). … Switzer v. City of Tulsa, 598 P.2d 247, 248 (Okl.Cr.1979).