Case law

Ross v. State

32 Okla. Crim. 433 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1925

“No warrant shall be issued to search a private residence, occupied as such, unless it, or some part of it, is used as a store, shop, hotel, boarding house, or place for storage, or unless such residence is a place of public … S. 1921. v These provisions safeguard the citizen, in his person, his home, and his property against unreasonable and unlawful search and seizure.

Cox v. City of Oklahoma City

671 P.2d 67 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1983

Green v. State, 611 P.2d 262 (Okl.Cr.1980). The rules of the Police Department which expanded the requirements of the ordinance could not be used to define criminal conduct. … See Wray v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 442 P.2d 309 (Okl.Cr.1968).

Scheidt v. Rakestraw

548 P.2d 677 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1976

The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court shall extend to a general superintendent control over all inferior courts and all Agencies, Commissions and Boards created by law. … An inferior court has been judicially defined, and properly so, by the Supreme Court of New Mexico in State ex rel. *679 Harvey v.

Strong v. State

547 P.2d 383 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1976

[O.R. 67] As set forth in the fourth paragraph of the Syllabus in Brown v. … See, Ausmus v. State, 43 Okl.Cr. 66 , 277 P. 259 (1928), and Garrett v. State, Okl.Cr., 525 P.2d 1238 (1974).

STATE ex rel. PRUITT v. STEIDLEY

349 P.3d 554 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 22, 2015

As set forth in State v. … To appear at the request of the Governor, the Legislature, or either branch thereof, and prosecute and defend in any court or before any commission, board or officers any cause or proceeding, civil or criminal, in which the

Barnoskie v. State

26 Okla. Crim. 19 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1924

Ernst v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 282 , 187 Pac. 930 ; Brown v. State, 16 Okla. 505 , 184 Pac. 912 ; Ballew v. *21 State, 15 Okla. Cr. 645 , 179 Pac. 945 . It follows that the motion to dismiss the appeal is well founded.

Evans v. State

541 P.2d 269 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1975

In Anthamatten v. State, Okl.Cr., 506 P.2d 959 , this Court citing Bridgeman v. … Brown, 456 F.2d 18 (10th Cir. 1972) in *272 which 10 O.S.Supp.1969, § 1101(A) was declared unconstitutional and Radcliff v.

Moore v. State

672 P.2d 1175 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1983

He relies on Reeves v. … Regardless, we held in Brown v. State, 563 P.2d 1182 (Okl.Cr.1977), that ordinarily improper remarks made by the prosecutor provoked by and in response to argument of defense counsel will not be grounds for reversal.

Pickens v. State

72 O.B.A.J. 388 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 2001

Appellant said the store clerk reached under the counter to get the change and put the money in a brown paper (candy) sack; both the change box and the small *876 brown sacks were located directly beneath the register. … See Brown v. State, 1973 OK CR 109 , T10, 506 P.2d 1396, 1399 . " .

Walker v. State

65 O.B.A.J. 3261 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1994

See Smallwood v. State, 763 P.2d 142, 144 (Okl.Cr.1988). See also Brown v. … See McCarty v. State, 765 P.2d 1215, 1221 (Okl.Cr.1988). 116 . Id. 117 . Id. at 561-62. 118 . See Pickens, 850 P.2d at 342 ; Brown, 753 P.2d at 913 . 119 .

OLIVER v. STATE

516 P.3d 699 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 11, 2022

Bench v. … Taylor v. State , 2011 OK CR 8 248 P.3d 362 Browning v.

Rogers v. State

488 P.2d 366 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1971

The informant returned to where the officers were and delivered to them a capsule containing a brown powder substance (which a field test later proved to be of an opiate derivative). … And, Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct. 1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963).

Ray v. State

40 Okla. Crim. 413 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1928

S.) 673; Johnson v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 1 , 112 P. 760 ; Spencer v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 7 , 113 P. 224 ; Hast v. Ty., 5 Okla. Cr. 162 , 114 P. 261 ; Ryan v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 623 , 129 P. 685 ; Simpson v. State, 16 Okla. … Thomas v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 550 , 190 P. 711 ; Sherman v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 269 , 200 P. 262 ; Brown v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 217 , 242 P. 1065 .

State v. Barnett

60 Okla. Crim. 355 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1936

Citing Czarra v. Board of Medical Sup’rs of District of Columbia, 25 App. D. C. 443; State v. Keasley, 50 La. Ann. 761 , 23 So. 900 ; State v. Lawrence, 9 Okla. Cr. 16 , 130 Pac. 508 ; Stewart v. State, 4 Okla. … In the case of Bynum v.

Ex Parte Birchfield

90 Okla. Crim. 197 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1949

In Killian v. … Foot v. District Court, 77 Mont. 290 , 250 P. 973 , 49 A. L. A. 398; 31 Am. Jur. 793 ; Richardson v. Browning, 57 App. D. C. 186, 18 F. 2d 1008 . Petitioners cite Ex parte Lewis, 3 Cal.

Mahorney v. State

664 P.2d 1042 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 24, 1983

Supreme Court decision of Michael M. v. … Hill v. State, 589 P.2d 1073 (Okl.Cr.1979). A person has a clear constitutional right to remain silent from the moment he becomes a suspect. Brown v. State, 541 P.2d 242 (Okl.Cr.1975).

Stroud v. State

57 Okla. Crim. 273 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1935

Griffith v. State, 36 Okla. Cr. 322 , 254 Pac. 112 ; State ex rel. Davis v. Bayless, District Judge, 38 Okla. Cr. 129 , 259 Pac. 606 . … Pickett v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 60 , 248 Pac. 352 ; Campbell v. State, 23 Okla. Cr. 250 , 214 Pac. 738 .

Zeigler v. State

62 O.B.A.J. 691 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1991

See Brown v. State, 677 P.2d 1089, 1091 (Okl.Cr.1984). Appellant next contends that the trial court erred in failing to give him a jury trial. … Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752 , 100 S.Ct. 2455 , 65 L.Ed.2d 488 (1980).

Hudson v. State

78 Okla. Crim. 160 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1944

The Oklahoma State Reformatory shall be under the general charge and management of the said board of control.” 57 O. … Pittman v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 58 , 126 P. 696 ; Almerigi v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 458 , 188 P. 1094 ; Littrell v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 466 , 208 P. 1048 ; Quinn v. State, 52 Okla. Cr. 81 , 2 P. 2d 970 . In Quinn v.

Woodruff v. State

63 O.B.A.J. 540 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1992

He saw a brown Mercury Cougar backed into a parking space at the apartment complex where he, Thompson, and Irvin lived. … Murray v. State, 528 P.2d 739 (Okl.Cr.1974).