Case law

Stone v. State

24 Okla. Crim. 264 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1923

The motion to dismiss the appeal as to Stone is sustained upon authority of the following cases: Odom v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 540 , 129 Pac. 445 ; Ernst v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 282 , 187 Pac. 930 ; Brown v. State, 16 Okla.

Noland v. State

495 P.2d 416 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1972

Within thirty (30) days from the date this request is made by the court, or within such extended time as the court may allow, the Pardon and Parole Board shall make a written report to the court, a copy of such report to … (emphasis added) See, also, this Court’s decision in Jones v. State, Okl.Cr., 477 P.2d 85 (1970) which deals with a similar fact situation.

Miles v. State

554 P.2d 1200 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1976

Brown v. State, Okl. Cr., 456 P.2d 604, 605 (1969). Further, in Colvard v. … Roberts v. State, Okl.Cr., 473 P.2d 264, 268 (1970), Young v. State, Okl.Cr., 531 P.2d 1403, 1407 (1975).

Edwards v. State

307 P.2d 872 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 20, 1957

See also McGaugh v. State, 12 Okl.Cr. 96 , 152 P. 140 ; Bryson v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 49 , 248 P.2d 253 ; Ex parte Brown, 77 Okl. Cr. 96, 139 P.2d 196 ; Chandler v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 344 , 255 P.2d 299 . … And see particularly Halbouer v. Cuenin, 45 Colo. 507 , 101 P. 763 ; and Caffee v. State, 11 Okl.Cr. 263 , 145 P. 499 ; Vahlberg v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 102, 110, 111 , 249 P.2d 736 .

State v. Johnsey

46 Okla. Crim. 233 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 20, 1930

Lim. pp. 556-575; Wagner v. Milwaukee County, 112 Wis. 601 , 88 N. W. 577 ; Nichols v. Walter, *237 37 Minn. 264 , 33 N. W. 800 ; Sutton v. State, 96 Tenn. 696 , 36 S. W. 697 , 33 L. R. A. 589; Murray v. … Board of Com’rs of Ramsey County, 81 Minn. 359 , 84 N. W. 103 , 51 L. R. A. 828,. 83 Am. St. Rep. page 379.

Jones v. State

789 P.2d 245 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1990

In Bickerstaff v. … Faubion v. State, 569 P.2d 1022, 1025 (Okl.Cr.1977).

McClintoc v. State

24 Okla. Crim. 442 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1923

Ernst v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 282 , 187 Pac. 930 ; Brown v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 505 , 184 Pac. 912 ; Alexander v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 200 , 153 Pac. 619 .

Boyd v. State

97 Okla. Crim. 331 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1953

Under the record the time for making and serving the case-made expired 15 dáys thereafter or on the 21st of March 1952, Title 22, § 1059, and Title 12, § 958, O.S. 1951; Brown v. State, 89 Okla. … “In David v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 535 , 179 P. 48 , and in Tinney v. State, 19 Okla.

Bowdry v. State

60 Okla. Crim. 46 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1936

S. v. Kelih (D. C.) 272 F. 484 , the court in the first paragraph of its syllabus said: “A search warrant was void, if issued without an oath or affirmation, as required by Const. Amend. 4.” In Morris v. State, 2 Tex. … S. 1931, is as follows: “No warrant shall be issued to search a private residence, occupied as such, unless it, or some part of, is used as a store, shop, hotel, boarding house, or place for *49 storage, or unless such residence

State v. Young

20 Okla. Crim. 397 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1922

Young et al. v. State, decided at this term, 20 Okla. Cr. 383 , 203 Pac. 484 , 490. … And see State ex rel. v. Russell, 33 Okla. 141 , 124 Pac. 1092 .

Bray v. State

450 P.2d 512 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1969

The one on the right, identified as the defendant, got out, climbed up on the left running board of the truck with a pistol and after a few words, demanded that Ledford descend. … See, Fields v. State, 77 Okl.Cr. 1 , 138 P.2d 124 ; Nemecek v. State, 72 Okl.Cr. 195 , 114 P.2d 492 , 135 A.L.R. 1149 ; and, White v. State, 36 Okl.Cr. 57 , 252 P. 455 .

Mitchell v. State

884 P.2d 1186 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1994

See, e.g., Brown v. State, 871 P.2d 56, 63 (Okl.Cr.1994); Ellis v. State, 867 P.2d 1289, 1294 (Okl.Cr.1994); Robedeaux v. … Pickens, 850 P.2d at 339-340 ; Revilla, 877 P.2d at 1153-54 ; Brown v. State, 871 P.2d at 74; Williamson v.

Scott v. State

510 P.2d 1008 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 30, 1973

See 21 O.S.1971 § 51; Walker v. State, Okl.Cr., 485 P.2d 761 (1971); and Moore v. State, Okl.Cr., 491 P.2d 359 (1971). Lamb v. … See Roberts v. State, Okl.Cr., 473 P.2d 264 (1970); Turnbow v. State, Okl.Cr., 451 P. 2d 387 (1969); and Fields v. State, Okl.Cr., 501 P.2d 1390 (1972).

Jefferson v. State

675 P.2d 443 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1984

Hanna v. … See, Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977).

Herndon v. State

552 P.2d 707 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1976

And, in the case of Bacon v. … (Citations omitted) Also see, State v. Brown, 360 Mo. 104 , 227 S.W.2d 646 (1950); State v. Frese, 256 Iowa 289, 127 N.W.2d 83 (1964); Tucker v. State, Tex.Cr., 461 S.W.2d 630 (1971); State v.

Riddle v. State

288 P.2d 761 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1955

See Rosser v. State, 55 Okl.Cr. 185 , 26 P.2d 769 ; Wheat v. State, 34 Okl.Cr. 82 , 244 P. 821 , and Cotts v. State, 34 Okl.Cr. 59 , 244 P. 817 . … Brown v. State, 9 Okl.Cr. 382 , 132 P. 359 ; Bingham v.

Coddington v. State

259 P.3d 833 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 23, 2011

v. … Browning v. State, 2006 OK CR 37, ¶ 4 , 144 P.3d 155, 157 .

Champeau v. State

678 P.2d 1192 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1984

Brown v. State, 481 P.2d 475 (Okl.Cr.1971), Syllabus 3. We find sufficient additional factors beyond appellant’s mere presence on the premises to indicate his knowledge and at least joint control of the contraband. … In Martin v.

Boyd v. State

839 P.2d 1363 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1992

Brown, 860 F.2d 1545 (10th Cir.1988), reversed on other grounds, sub nom., Saffle v. Parks, 494 U.S. 484 , 110 S.Ct. 1257 , 108 L.Ed.2d 415 (1990), we find no such error in this case. … Appellant alleges that the instruction is violative of Mills for the reasons set forth in Parks v. Brown, supra. The relevant instructions given in the instant case are identical to those given in Fox v.

Brooks v. State

533 P.2d 639 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1975

In Thomas v. … See Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 487 P.2d 963 (1971).