Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,434 results
1.43s
617 P.2d 588 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 29, 1980
It would not be proper for you to consider what the Pardon and Parole Board may or may not do with any person convicted of a crime. … The jury was merely informed that parole was not a matter for their concern, but was for the parole board to determine. The trial court’s answer is in compliance with 22 O.S.1971, § 894, and is not error. See Hair v.
Cited 84 timesPublished2015 OK CR 14 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 2015
STATE Discussed 2006 OK CR 8, 134 P.3d 816, BROWNING v. STATE Discussed at Length 2006 OK CR 19, 139 P.3d 907, HOGAN v. STATE Discussed at Length 2006 OK CR 20, 136 P.3d 671, MITCHELL v. … STATE Discussed 2008 OK CR 3, 177 P.3d 577, BROWN v. STATE Discussed 2008 OK CR 19, 188 P.3d 208, WILLIAMS v. STATE Discussed 2009 OK CR 12, 206 P.3d 607, FISHER v. STATE Cited 2009 OK CR 13, 206 P.3d 1020, HANSON v.
Cited 0 timesPublished581 P.2d 475 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1978
In Brown v. … Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 506 P.2d 1396 (1973). Because of the nature of the appellant’s assertions, we find that the requisite necessity has not been demonstrated.
Cited 10 timesPublished4 Okla. Crim. 662 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1911
Law, 145; Mayor, etc., v. Allaire, 14 Ala. 400 ; Hamilton v. State, 3 Tex. App. 643; Shafer v. Mumma, 17 Md. 331 ; State v. Sly, 4 Or. 277 ; Johnson v. State, 59 Miss. 543 ; Wragg v. Penn. Tp. 94 Ill. 11 ; McLaughlin v. … Emerick v. Harris, 1 Binn. 416 ; Murphy v. People, 2 Cros. 815; Jackson v. Wood, 2 Conn. 819; Beers v. Beers, 4 Conn. 535; Sullivan v. Adams, 3 Gray, 477 .
Cited 32 timesPublished504 P.2d 442 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1972
Baker v. State, Okl.Cr., 433 P.2d 853 (1967). … See Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 494 P.2d 344 .
Cited 1 timesPublished16 Okla. Crim. 624 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1919
That the said Compton was a competent witness against the defendant and on behalf of the state is the holding of this court in the following cases: Brown v. State,. 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 Pac. 359 ; Montgomery v. … Stockton et al. v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 310 , 114 Pac. 626 ; Hawkins v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 385 , 123 Pac. 1024 ; Bigfeather v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 364 , 123 Pac. 1026 ; Grayson v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 226 , 154 Pac. 334 .
Cited 16 timesPublished564 P.2d 257 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 16, 1977
In dealing with a similar question in Cory v. State, Okl.Cr., 543 P.2d 565 (1975), we stated: “Davenport v. State . . . … In Ohio in State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished3 Okla. Crim. 265 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1909
In the ease of Faggard v. … This court *268 held, in the eases of Sharp v. State, ante, p. 24, 104 Pac. 71, and Faggard v.
Cited 4 timesPublished675 P.2d 469 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1984
Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d at 122 . … Browning v. State, 648 P.2d 1261 (Okl.Cr.1982).
Cited 3 timesPublished474 P.2d 966 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1970
Cole told him that a white male, 21 years of age, 6 feet tall, wearing a checked shirt and a light brown coat, who used a rifle or shotgun, robbed her; that said officer also talked to Mr. Gene Marshall and Mr. … Syllabus # 6, Puckett v. State, Okl.Cr., 363 P.2d 953 .
Cited 2 timesPublished80 Okla. Crim. 43 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1945
Floor boards had been cut so as to make a door or lid for the plant, and a hole had been bored in one board so that a finger could be inserted and the lid raised. … Simons v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 265 , 101 P. 2d 852 ; Tripp v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 69 , 118 P. 2d 273 ; Golden v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 121 , 129 P. 2d 202 ; Barfield v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 455 , 99 P. 2d 544 . Mrs.
Cited 3 timesPublished42 Okla. Crim. 227 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1929
In Phillips v. State, 20 Okla. … In Baldwin v. State, 11 Okla.
Cited 1 timesPublished573 P.2d 263 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1978
Browning Pipestem and Mr. William Douglas Giessmann on behalf of United Indian Tribes of Western Oklahoma and Kansas as amicus curiae. … United States v. Ramsey, 271 U.S. 467 , 46 S.Ct. 559 , 70 L.Ed. 1039 (1926). In DeCoteau v.
Cited 12 timesPublished486 P.2d 757 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1971
In Phelps v. … However, even considering that defendant’s contentions were correct, we observe for guidance the decision of the Oklahoma State Supreme Court in Brown v.
Overruled in part by Golden v. State, 2006 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 2 (2006)Cited 8 timesPublished744 P.2d 193 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1987
Both deputies identified the baggies as the ones taken from the pickup driven by the appellant by noting their initials on a sealed brown envelope. … See Horn v. State, 671 P.2d 1163,1165 (Okla.Crim.App.1983).
Cited 1 timesPublished92 Okla. Crim. 53 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1950
See Whitlow v. State, 85 Okla. Cr. 2 , 184 P. 2d 253 ; Long v. State, 84 Okla. Cr. 445 , 184 P. 2d 119 ; Parks v. State, 83 Okla. Cr. 70 , 173 P. 2d 234 . We shall consider the sufficiency of the evidence. … Aston out of the gas but that it strangled him so that he could not get him out and that witness ran and called for help, and that Sergeant Brown, Mr. Edge and Mr.
Cited 15 timesPublished12 Okla. Crim. 549 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1916
See also State v. Hunnicutt, 34 Ark. 562 ; State v. O’Keen, 35 La. Ann. 901 ; State v. Flourney, 46 La. Ann. 1519 , 16 So. 454 ; State v. Smith, 16 So. 938 ; State v. Pellerin, 43 So. 161 ; People v. … In the case of State v.
Cited 14 timesPublished62 O.B.A.J. 3130 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1991
In Coleman v. … Brown, 860 F.2d 1545 (10th Cir.1988), concerning the effect of the “anti-sympathy” instruction on a particular jury.
Cited 10 timesPublished575 P.2d 636 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1978
As we stated in State v. Brown, 8 Okl.Cr. 40 , 126 P. 245 , Ann.Cas. 1914C, 394 (1912), both the State and the accused are entitled to a hearing before an impartial judge. … Compare, Easterling v. State, Okl.Cr., 284 P.2d 741 (1955), and Wininegar v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 64 , 257 P.2d 526 (1953).
Cited 0 timesPublished763 P.2d 1180 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1988
Supp. 1982, § 2-405, which was declared unconstitutional in Cole v. State, 511 P.2d 593 (Okla.Crim.App.1973). We agree. … See Hammonds v. State, 739 P.2d 525, 527 (Okla.Crim.App.1987); Brown v. State, 481 P.2d 475, 477 (Okla.Crim.App.1971). This assignment of error is without merit.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna