Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

3,434 results

1.43s

  • Irvin v. State

    617 P.2d 588 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 29, 1980

    It would not be proper for you to consider what the Pardon and Parole Board may or may not do with any person convicted of a crime. … The jury was merely informed that parole was not a matter for their concern, but was for the parole board to determine. The trial court’s answer is in compliance with 22 O.S.1971, § 894, and is not error. See Hair v.

    Cited 84 timesPublished
  • BOSSE v. STATE

    2015 OK CR 14 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 2015

    STATE Discussed 2006 OK CR 8, 134 P.3d 816, BROWNING v. STATE Discussed at Length 2006 OK CR 19, 139 P.3d 907, HOGAN v. STATE Discussed at Length 2006 OK CR 20, 136 P.3d 671, MITCHELL v. … STATE Discussed 2008 OK CR 3, 177 P.3d 577, BROWN v. STATE Discussed 2008 OK CR 19, 188 P.3d 208, WILLIAMS v. STATE Discussed 2009 OK CR 12, 206 P.3d 607, FISHER v. STATE Cited 2009 OK CR 13, 206 P.3d 1020, HANSON v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cavaness v. State

    581 P.2d 475 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1978

    In Brown v. … Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 506 P.2d 1396 (1973). Because of the nature of the appellant’s assertions, we find that the requisite necessity has not been demonstrated.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In Re Simmons

    4 Okla. Crim. 662 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1911

    Law, 145; Mayor, etc., v. Allaire, 14 Ala. 400 ; Hamilton v. State, 3 Tex. App. 643; Shafer v. Mumma, 17 Md. 331 ; State v. Sly, 4 Or. 277 ; Johnson v. State, 59 Miss. 543 ; Wragg v. Penn. Tp. 94 Ill. 11 ; McLaughlin v. … Emerick v. Harris, 1 Binn. 416 ; Murphy v. People, 2 Cros. 815; Jackson v. Wood, 2 Conn. 819; Beers v. Beers, 4 Conn. 535; Sullivan v. Adams, 3 Gray, 477 .

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Jeremiah v. State

    504 P.2d 442 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1972

    Baker v. State, Okl.Cr., 433 P.2d 853 (1967). … See Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 494 P.2d 344 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bradshaw v. State

    16 Okla. Crim. 624 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1919

    That the said Compton was a competent witness against the defendant and on behalf of the state is the holding of this court in the following cases: Brown v. State,. 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 Pac. 359 ; Montgomery v. … Stockton et al. v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 310 , 114 Pac. 626 ; Hawkins v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 385 , 123 Pac. 1024 ; Bigfeather v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 364 , 123 Pac. 1026 ; Grayson v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 226 , 154 Pac. 334 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Shoultz

    564 P.2d 257 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 16, 1977

    In dealing with a similar question in Cory v. State, Okl.Cr., 543 P.2d 565 (1975), we stated: “Davenport v. State . . . … In Ohio in State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Baker v. State

    3 Okla. Crim. 265 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1909

    In the ease of Faggard v. … This court *268 held, in the eases of Sharp v. State, ante, p. 24, 104 Pac. 71, and Faggard v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Vining v. State

    675 P.2d 469 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1984

    Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d at 122 . … Browning v. State, 648 P.2d 1261 (Okl.Cr.1982).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Engst v. State

    474 P.2d 966 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1970

    Cole told him that a white male, 21 years of age, 6 feet tall, wearing a checked shirt and a light brown coat, who used a rifle or shotgun, robbed her; that said officer also talked to Mr. Gene Marshall and Mr. … Syllabus # 6, Puckett v. State, Okl.Cr., 363 P.2d 953 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fitzgerald v. State

    80 Okla. Crim. 43 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1945

    Floor boards had been cut so as to make a door or lid for the plant, and a hole had been bored in one board so that a finger could be inserted and the lid raised. … Simons v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 265 , 101 P. 2d 852 ; Tripp v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 69 , 118 P. 2d 273 ; Golden v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 121 , 129 P. 2d 202 ; Barfield v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 455 , 99 P. 2d 544 . Mrs.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ross v. State

    42 Okla. Crim. 227 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1929

    In Phillips v. State, 20 Okla. … In Baldwin v. State, 11 Okla.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Littlechief

    573 P.2d 263 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1978

    Browning Pipestem and Mr. William Douglas Giessmann on behalf of United Indian Tribes of Western Oklahoma and Kansas as amicus curiae. … United States v. Ramsey, 271 U.S. 467 , 46 S.Ct. 559 , 70 L.Ed. 1039 (1926). In DeCoteau v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Landrum v. State

    486 P.2d 757 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1971

    In Phelps v. … However, even considering that defendant’s contentions were correct, we observe for guidance the decision of the Oklahoma State Supreme Court in Brown v.

    Overruled in part by Golden v. State, 2006 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 2 (2006)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Sims v. State

    744 P.2d 193 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1987

    Both deputies identified the baggies as the ones taken from the pickup driven by the appellant by noting their initials on a sealed brown envelope. … See Horn v. State, 671 P.2d 1163,1165 (Okla.Crim.App.1983).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Woods v. State

    92 Okla. Crim. 53 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1950

    See Whitlow v. State, 85 Okla. Cr. 2 , 184 P. 2d 253 ; Long v. State, 84 Okla. Cr. 445 , 184 P. 2d 119 ; Parks v. State, 83 Okla. Cr. 70 , 173 P. 2d 234 . We shall consider the sufficiency of the evidence. … Aston out of the gas but that it strangled him so that he could not get him out and that witness ran and called for help, and that Sergeant Brown, Mr. Edge and Mr.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Blake v. State

    12 Okla. Crim. 549 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1916

    See also State v. Hunnicutt, 34 Ark. 562 ; State v. O’Keen, 35 La. Ann. 901 ; State v. Flourney, 46 La. Ann. 1519 , 16 So. 454 ; State v. Smith, 16 So. 938 ; State v. Pellerin, 43 So. 161 ; People v. … In the case of State v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Robison v. State

    62 O.B.A.J. 3130 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1991

    In Coleman v. … Brown, 860 F.2d 1545 (10th Cir.1988), concerning the effect of the “anti-sympathy” instruction on a particular jury.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • CRB v. State

    575 P.2d 636 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1978

    As we stated in State v. Brown, 8 Okl.Cr. 40 , 126 P. 245 , Ann.Cas. 1914C, 394 (1912), both the State and the accused are entitled to a hearing before an impartial judge. … Compare, Easterling v. State, Okl.Cr., 284 P.2d 741 (1955), and Wininegar v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 64 , 257 P.2d 526 (1953).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Russell v. State

    763 P.2d 1180 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1988

    Supp. 1982, § 2-405, which was declared unconstitutional in Cole v. State, 511 P.2d 593 (Okla.Crim.App.1973). We agree. … See Hammonds v. State, 739 P.2d 525, 527 (Okla.Crim.App.1987); Brown v. State, 481 P.2d 475, 477 (Okla.Crim.App.1971). This assignment of error is without merit.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.