Case law

Massie v. State

553 P.2d 186 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 5, 1976

Jewell v. Territory, supra. See also Gibson v. State, Okl.Cr., 476 P.2d 362 (1971), and State v. Mitchell, 29 Wash.2d 468 , 188 P.2d 88 (1947). … Again in Jewell v.

Edwards v. State

46 Okla. Crim. 77 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1930

Brown v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 Pac. 359 ; Hildebrandt v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 30 , 197 Pac. 852 . … In Mays v. State, 19 Okla.

Velasco v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections

253 P.3d 964 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2011

McDonnell, 418 U.S. at 564-66 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 (citing Morrissey v. … Waldon v. Evans, 1993 OK CR 46 , 861 P.2d 311 .

Williams v. State

524 P.2d 57 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1974

In McLeroy v. … In Morris v.

Johnston v. State

673 P.2d 844 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1983

He had dark brown hair, hazel eyes, was clean shaven, and was about 26 or 27 years old. … In Gautt v.

Porter v. State

666 P.2d 784 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1983

Neal v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). In Manson v. … See, 22 O.S.1981, § 831(3), and Brown v. State, 50 Okl.Cr. 103 , 297 P. 303 (1931). In addition, no accumulation of error exists in this case requiring modification or reversal. 1 .

Rowden v. State

397 P.2d 515 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1964

The evidence further establishes that from and after June 15, 1963, until the time of the trial, the defendant was ■ employed by Co-op Grain Elevator, Perry, Oklahoma, Donald Brown and C. Ray Smith. … State, 85 Okl.Cr. 159 , 186 P.2d 844 (1947) ; Williams v. State, 62 Okl.Cr. 298 , 71 P.2d *517 496 (1937); Ballard v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 420 , 223 P.2d 782 (1950).

Hudson v. State

20 Okla. Crim. 435 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1922

Brown v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 64 , 175 Pac. 66 . In addition, it is clearly disclosed by the record that the testimony of Bertha Hudson, the absent witness, was purely cumulative. … Rose v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 294 , 127 Pac. 873 ; Litchfield v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 164 , 126 Pac. 707 ; Petty v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 438 , 147 Pac. 782 ; Cope v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 437 , 177 Pac. 920 .

Cudjo v. State

521 P.2d 1393 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1974

Jackson v. State, Okl.Cr., 494 P.2d 358 (1972). The defendant’s second proposition asserts that the punishment is excessive. We find this proposition to be wholly without merit. … See Akins v. Texas, 325 U.S. 398 , 65 S.Ct. 1276 , 89 L.Ed.2d 1692 .

In re Habeas Corpus of Keith

482 P.2d 942 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1971

Title 57 O.S. § 332 through § 355, provides the statutory authority governing the Pardon and Parole Board concerning the granting of reprieves, commutations, paroles and pardons. … See: Hunter v. Facchine, 10 Cir., 195 F.2d 1007 (1952).

Limbird v. State

340 P.2d 946 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1959

Criminal Law § 830; Gorum v. State, 60 Okl.Cr. 248 , 63 P.2d 765 ; Young v. State, 56 Okl.Cr. 375 , 40 P.2d 686 ; Bridwell v. State, 52 Okl.Cr. 353 , 5 P.2d 403 ; Isaacs v. … Cardwell, 90 Kan. 606 , 135 P. 597 , L.R.A.1916B, 745; Brown v.

Price v. State

53 Okla. Crim. 353 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 28, 1932

Cr. 623 , 129 Pac. 685 ; Simpson v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 533 , 185 Pac. 116 ; Thomas v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 550 , 190 Pac. 711 ; Sherman v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 269 , 200 Pac. 262 ; Brown v. State, 33 Okla. … Montgomery v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 224 , 199 Pac. 222 ; Davenport v. State, 20 Okla. Cr. 253 , 202 Pac. 18 ; Womble v. State, 50 Okla. Cr. 108 , 296 Pac. 515 ; Robnett v. State, 51 Okla. Cr. 33 , 299 Pac. 241 .

In Re Pruitt

11 Okla. Crim. 695 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 20, 1915

Brown, supra, and since the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Pitket v. U. S., 216 U. S. 456 , 54 L. Ed. 566 , the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in the case of Coyle v. … Smith, 28 Okla. 121 , 113 Pac. 944 , has held that the Pickett case was not in conflict with the decision in Higgins v. Brown.

Ex Parte Johnson

13 Okla. Crim. 30 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1917

Co. v. Fisher, 166 U. S. 467 , 17 Sup. Ct. 618, 41 L. Ed. 1079 ; Thompson v. Utah, 170 U. S. 343 , 18 Sup. Ct. 620, 42 L. Ed. 1061 ; Capital Traction Co, v. Hof, 174 U. S. 5 , 19 Sup. Ct. 580, 43 L. Ed. 873 ; Black v. … Ed. 801 ; Rassmussen v. United States, 197 U. S. 516 , 25 Sup. Ct. 514, 49 L. Ed. 862 . *39 In the case of Callan v.

In Re the Habeas Corpus of Langley

325 P.2d 1094 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 21, 1958

A municipal or corporate board acts as a board, and no agent can bind it unless he acts within the scope of his authority. The Board did not act until January 13, 1953 when petitioner’s parole was revoked. … Westbrook v.

Fowler v. State

80 Okla. Crim. 86 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1945

They stopped his .car, searched it, and found one pint of whisky hidden in a secret built-in compartment up under the dash board. No evidence was offered on behalf of the defendant. … Gee v. State, 53 Okla. Cr. 383 , 12 P. 2d 547 ; Robinson v. State, 44 Okla. Cr. 189 , 280 P. 1112 .

Jones v. State

542 P.2d 1316 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1975

See, Lowden v. Washita County Excise Board, 188 Okl. 698 , 113 P.2d 370 (1941), and Ex parte Lee, 88 Okl.Cr. 386 , 203 P.2d 720 (1949). … Fulton v. State Election Board, 168 Okl. 446 , 33 P.2d 800 (1934), and Brooks v. State, 152 Okl. 119 , 3 P.2d 814 (1931).

Ex Parte Strauch

80 Okla. Crim. 89 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1945

Hinebaugh v. James, supra; Johnson v. Board of Com’rs of Reno County, supra; Pellicer v. Sweat, Sheriff, supra; People v. Lewis, supra. … See, also, Johnson v. Board of County Commissioners, Kan., supra, and Pellicer v. Sweat, Sheriff, Fla., supra. In 12 Am.

McKinnon v. State

651 P.2d 1066 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1982

In Brown v. … In Harris v.

Ex Parte Harkins

7 Okla. Crim. 464 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1912

Brown, judge of the Second judicial district, and for some reason, which is unexplained, he did not pass upon the merits of the case, and the petition was withdrawn, at his request, and then presented to this court.- The … Cr., 114 Pac. 269, 270, Hast v. Territory. Is there any crime which such a man would hesitate to commit, if it suited his purposes?