Case law

Haley v. State

39 Okla. Crim. 186 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1928

In the case of Browning v. State, 31 Okla. … Wilson *190 v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 139 , 240 P. 155 ; Shields v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 344 , 240 P. 661 . There are a number of errors assigned, but in the view we take of this record it is not necessary to consider them.

Morey v. State

6 Okla. Crim. 166 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1911

Sullins, one of the board of county commissioners of Okmulgee county, Oklahoma,, hereto attached and marked 'Exhibit B,’ and 'Exhibit C,’ respectively, and made a part of this motion.” … The question here raised was determined in the case of Tyler v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 179, 104 Pac. 919 , 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 921. See, also, Jacobs v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 648 , 108 Pac. 429 , Tydings v. State, 4 Okla.

Thornton v. State

49 Okla. Crim. 380 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1930

In the case of Brown v. State, 36 Okla. … In the case of Tarkington v. State, 41 Okla.

Windsor v. Turner

428 P.2d 740 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 31, 1967

The most recent Oklahoma case concerning the Interstate Parole Compact is Rider v. … Rider v. McLeod, Okl.Cr., 323 P.2d 741 , considers the Interstate Compact in more detail than is attempted in the instant ease.

Pitman v. State

33 Okla. Crim. 165 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1926

Nelson v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 868 , 114 P. 1124 ; Thompson v. State, 26 Okla. Cr. 121 , 222 P. 568 . … Witness Brown testifies to substantially the same thing. The jury were fully warranted in finding the defendant Pitman guilty. The case is affirmed. BESSEY, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Watson v. State

234 P.3d 111 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 2010

State, 1996 OK CR 56, ¶ 19 , 929 P.2d 988, 994 (defendant escaped before sentencing hearing); Brown v. … In Sonnier v.

Roedl v. State

76 Okla. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1943

Bishop, 155 Okla. 233 , 8 P. 2d 753 ; McNulty v. State, 90 Okla. 267 , 217 P. 467 ; Blanton v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 149 , 259 P. 655 . In the recent case of Miller v. State, 74 Okla. … That there was located therein a baseball board and a ticker tape machine for securing the results of baseball games played in the different leagues.

Braun v. State

66 O.B.A.J. 2675 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 7, 1995

Brown v. State, 871 P.2d 56, 62 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 517 , 130 L.Ed.2d 423 (1994); Shultz v. State, 811 P.2d 1322, 1329-30 (Okl.Cr.1991). … Brown, 871 P.2d at 62 (quoting Wininegar v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 64, 68 , 257 P.2d 526, 531 (1953)).

Hurt v. State

312 P.2d 169 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 29, 1957

Hendricks v. … Mitchell v.

Daniels v. State

558 P.2d 405 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 27, 1976

This fear was expressed in Brown v. United States, 356 F.2d 230, 233 (10th Cir. 1966). The facts in Brown v. United States, were that one of the juror’s brothers had been murdered some years earlier. … Brown v. United States, supra, at 232. Perhaps the most important considerations are that the juror Herndon was examined on voir dire as to any bias he might have and again at the hearing for new trial.

Synnott v. State

515 P.2d 1154 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1973

Compare Cox v. State, Okl.Cr., 395 P.2d 954 (1964) with Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966). … Wolfenbarger v. State, Okl.Cr., 508 P.2d 694 (1973).

Fitzgerald v. State

69 O.B.A.J. 4307 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1998

As we set out in Banks v. … I remain committed to the view expressed in Rogers v. State, 890 P.2d 959, 979 (Okl.Cr.1995) (Lumpkin, J. Concur in results) and Hawkins v.

Woods v. State

713 P.2d 1046 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1986

He said he had nothing peculiar about his face and he was wearing jeans and a brown leather jacket. It is apparent this description would fit a large number of people. … See also Porter v. State, 666 P.2d 784 (Okl.Cr.1983); Manson v. Braithwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct. 2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977). In the present case the pretrial confrontation was very suggestive.

Grigsby v. State

496 P.2d 1188 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 3, 1972

After the explosion Marion Smith, who lived across the street from Miss Shaw’s home, ran out and observed a brown Ford Fairlane 500 driving past the scene. … In the landmark cases of United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967) and Gilbert v.

Yeager v. State

82 Okla. Crim. 326 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 29, 1946

In the case of Raymer v. State, 41 Okla. … In Yeargin v. State, 54 Okla.

Good v. State

21 Okla. Crim. 328 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1922

Brown v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 678 , 126 Pac. 263 ; Geo. Reed v. State, 22 Okla. Cr.-, 210 Pac. 311 .

Boyd v. State

290 P.2d 160 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1955

Wilson v. State, Okl.Cr., 268 P.2d 585 ; Sanders v. State, supra. In the‘case of Stevens v. … In White v.

Ex Parte M.J. Wade

2 Okla. Crim. 100 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1909

Supp. 804, 805 ; Chicago Title & Trust Company v. Brown, 183 Ill. 42 , 55 N. E. 632, 633 , 47 L. R. A. 798; People v. Talmadge, 194 Ill. 67 , 61 N. E. 1049, 1050 ; Ginn v. Rogers, 9 Ill. (4 Gilman) 131, 134; Peak v. … Rep. 843 ; Sigmond v. Bebber, 104 Iowa, 431 , 73 N. W. 1027, 1028 ; Jones v. Brown, 6 N. W. 140 , 54 Iowa, 74, 79 , 37 Am. Rep. 185 ; Freem. Judgm. § 118; Oliver v. Riley, 92 Iowa, *107 23, 60 N.

Ex Parte Bochmann

20 Okla. Crim. 78 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1921

This ordinance was passed as an emergency measure by the board of commissioners on the day preceding the conviction. … Cr. 293 , 164 Pac. 130 ; Ed Franks v. City of Muskogee, 14 Okla. Cr. 391 , 171 Pac. 492 ; City of Blackwell v. Burgett, 14 Okla. Cr. 682 , 166 Pac. 442 ; Miller v. State, 17 Okla.

State v. Sowards

64 Okla. Crim. 430 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 12, 1938

There is no such officer mentioned in any statute, or the Constitution of the state, and no board or commission is authorized or directed to appoint any one to any such office, and no board or commission is authorized or … Newman v.