Case law

Hallmark v. State

36 Okla. Crim. 236 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1927

V. Brown, George Brigman, Reese Gallion, W. A. Parker, Mrs. Cash, and John Heep to that place on the 21st day of November, 1924. I have been to that place frequently. We found three pints and a half pint of whisky. … In Terry et al. v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 91 , 237 P. 465 , this court considered the identical question involved in this case, and held that a police judge was without authority to issue a search warrant.

Application of Russell

354 P.2d 485 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1960

Brown, Okl.Cr., 305 P.2d 593 , 595 we said: “From the record it clearly appears that the defendant waived his right to the aid of counsel, which he may do. Foster v.

State v. Kunis

718 P.2d 1356 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 12, 1986

The majority correctly cites State v. … Brown v. State, 314 P.2d 362, 365 (Okl.Cr.1957).

Wallace v. State

529 P.2d 548 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1974

. § 443, but is a separate and distinct offense which is the correct charging statute in situations such as found in Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 449 P.2d 274 . … See Sweden v. State, 83 Okl.Cr. 1 , 172 P.2d 432 and Dalton v. State, Okl.Cr., *550 388 P.2d 875 .

Grimes v. State

512 P.2d 231 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1973

Harrell v. State, Okl.Cr., 493 P.2d 461 (1972). Appellant’s second complaint alleges denial of access to a telephone upon his arrest. … As we said in Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 384 P.2d 54 (1963): “. . . The burden is on the defendant to establish prejudice by reason of the delay.” We therefore hold this complaint without merit.

STATE v. TERRY

2014 OK CR 14 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 2014

Id. ( quoting Morrissey v. … The Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board promulgates the rules and regulations for the supervision of parolees. See 57 O.S.2011, § 355.

State v. Holden

344 P.2d 595 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1959

In Moore v. … In Holder v.

Lenhart v. State

503 P.2d 918 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1972

In Kite v. … OLIVER: Comes now the defendant and objects to the defendant being dressed in brown khaki clothes which is indicative of prison clothes.”

Woodruff v. State

64 O.B.A.J. 166 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1993

Brown’s murder at the time that evidence was used at the trial for Ms. Ashmore’s murder. … Appellant argues that this *1147 particular aggravating circumstance must fall pursuant to our decision in Brown v.

Lewis v. State

335 P.2d 654 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1959

The testimony was clearly competent.” *656 In the case of Beach v. … Also see People v. Brown, 72 Cal.App.2d 717 , 165 P.2d 707 ; Boyer v. State, 68 Okl.Cr. 220 , 97 P.2d 779 ; Vanderslice v. State, 59 Okl.Cr. 192 , 57 P.2d 267 .

Bryan v. State

700 P.2d 202 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1985

Another director was absent from the board meeting at which the vote was taken, and appellant was ineligible to vote since he was the interested director. … See Dennis v. State, 561 P.2d 88 (Okl.Cr.1977). It is the opinion of this Court that the Judgment and Sentence herein should be, and hereby is, AFFIRMED. PARKS, P.J., concurs. BUSSEY, J., specially concurring.

SH v. State

555 P.2d 1050 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1976

See also D.G.B. v. State, Okl.Cr., 549 P.2d 94 (1976); Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 550 P.2d 963 (1976). [1] In the instant case, it is evident that the juvenile court did not make both of these ultimate findings. … Price v. Georgia, 398 U.S. 323 , 90 S.Ct. 1757 , 26 L.Ed.2d 300 (1970); Patty v. State, Okl.Cr., 497 P.2d 478 (1972).

MITCHELL v. STATE

387 P.3d 934 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 2016

There was also a two-by-four board in the ear. Mitchell told Parker to put the board in the pharmacy door when they went in so it wouldn’t lock behind them. … shows Parker blocking the door open with a board, and there was a board by the door after the crime, (d) Parker was wearing a mask, a white shirt on top of another shirt, OU sweatpants over another pair of pants, and a backpack

Lynch v. State

68 Okla. Crim. 303 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 29, 1939

Foster v. State, 27 Okla. Cr. 270 , 226 P. 602 ; Coatney v. State, 30 Okla. Cr. 270 , 235 P. 942 ; Kolander v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 31 , 241 P. 837 . … In Mason v. State, 60 Okla.

Baum v. State

95 Okla. Crim. 41 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1951

Arnold v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 166 , 110 P. 2d 309 . … As stated in Bisanar v. State, 93 Okla.

Bogard v. State

40 Okla. Crim. 12 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1928

Brown v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 509 , 196 P. 967 ; Aycock v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 302 , 240 P. 1081 ; Jones v. State, 39 Okla. Cr. 195 , 264 P. 638 .

Ex Parte George

63 Okla. Crim. 115 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1937

Gottschalk v. Brown, 207 App. Div. 695 , 201 N. Y. S. 862, cited by petitioner, supports his contention, but the decision was reversed in 237 N. Y. 483 , 143 N. E. 653 , 32 A. L. R. 1164, supra. … “We believe the decision in People v. Brown, 237 N. Y. 483 , 143 N. E. 653 , 32 A. L.

Bewley v. State

695 P.2d 1357 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1985

Appellant also asserts the trial judge, or a member of her family, was a board member of a bank that appellant was suing civily. Without support, this contention is without merit. Ferguson v. … See Ozbun v. State, 659 P.2d 954 (Okl.Cr.1983). We find this allegation meritless.

King v. State

44 Okla. Crim. 311 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1929

In Garnett Roebuck v. State, 14 Okla. … Browning v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 373 , 239 Pac. 272 ; Wilson v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 139 , 240 Pac. 155 ; Shields v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 344 , 240 Pac. 661 ; Tennison v. State, 32 Okla.

Glass v. State

36 Okla. Crim. 279 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1927

In Wilder v. State, 34 Okla. Cr. 291 , 246 Pac. 660 , we said: “The gist of the offense charged is the conveyance from one place to another ‘place.’ The word ‘place’ has a variable meaning. … In Brown v. State, 18 Okla.