Case law

Wright v. State

12 Okla. Crim. 443 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1916

Gentry v. State, 11th Okla. Cr. 355, 146 Pac. 719 ; Sayers v. State, 10th Okla. Cr. 233, 135 Pac. 1073 ; Watson v. State, 9th Okla. Cr. 1, 130 Pac. 816 ; Edwards v. State, 9th Okla. Cr. 306, 131 Pac. 956 , 44 L. R. A. … One Harve Brown, in support of the motion for a new trial, made an affidavit that he heard two of the jurors discuss the case before it was finally submitted to the jury, and that they agreed that if J. E.

Micco v. State

450 P.2d 237 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1969

See Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 424 P.2d 1003 . This Court has carefully examined the record and reviewed the testimony in the instant case and finds no fundamental error.

Davenport v. State

71 Okla. Crim. 91 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1940

The police officers went to the parking lot and looked through the glass windows and into' the car of the defendant and saw a great number of packages wrapped in brown paper, and which the officers recognized as being packages … Cr. 65 , 82 P. 2d 1006 ; Coburn v. State, 70 Okla. Cr......., 106 P. 2d 533 ; Arnold v. State, 70 Okla. Cr......., 105 P. 2d 556 ; Morris v. State, 66 Okla. Cr. 384 , 92 P. 2d 609 ; Morris v. State, 66 Okla.

Taylor v. State

646 P.2d 615 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1982

Detective Alvey testified that when Taylor was arrested he had on a brown leather coat. … In Holmes v. State, 568 P.2d 317 (Okl.Cr.1977), we ad *616 dressed this issue.

Sanders v. State

266 P.2d 491 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1954

Mitchell v. State, 73 Okl.Cr. 184 , 119 P.2d 99 ; Griffin v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 90 , 210 P.2d 671 ; Staley v. State, Okl.Cr., 256 P.2d 822 . … Blair v. State, 75 Okl.Cr. 265 , 130 P.2d 545 ; King v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 389 , 223 P.2d 773 ; and for comprehensive treatment of entire subject see Brinegar v. State, Okl.Cr., 262 P.2d 464 .

Stouffer v. State

62 O.B.A.J. 3014 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1991

See Parks v. Brown, 860 F.2d 1545 (10th Cir.1988). However, for the reasons stated in Fox v. … Parks v. Brown, 860 F.2d 1545 (10th Cir.1988), reversed on other grounds, sub nom., Saffle v. Parks, 494 U.S. 484 , 110 S.Ct. 1257 , 108 L.Ed.2d 415 (1990). Therefore, I find no error.

Skinner v. Page

450 P.2d 222 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1969

In United States v. … Sisson v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 426 P.2d 379 (1967). Likewise we find Petitioner’s final contention that his punishment was excessive, and is thus cruel and unusual punishment, without merit. In Brown v.

Reed v. State

50 Okla. Crim. 287 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1931

Brown v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 678 , 126 Pac. 263 ; Reed v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 141 , 210 Pac. 311 . … Cohn v. State, 120 Tenn. 61 , 109 S. W. 1149 , 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 451, 15 Ann. Cas. 1201; Boyd v. U. S., 116 U. S. 619 , 6 S. St. 524, 29 L. Ed. 746 ; Adams v. New York, 192 U. S. 586 , 24 S. Ct. 372 , 48 L. Ed. 577 .

MARTINEZ v. STATE

442 P.3d 154 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 9, 2019

Brown v. … STATE Discussed 1997 OK CR 1, 933 P.2d 316, Brown v. State Discussed oscn EMAIL: webmaster@oscn.net Oklahoma Judicial Center 2100 N Lincoln Blvd.

Prince v. State

620 P.2d 431 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1980

Both parties rely on Burroughs v. State, Okl.Cr., 528 P.2d 714 (1974), in which the defendant was advised of his right to remain silent and chose to do so. … Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 541 P.2d 242 (1975).

Roberts v. State

571 P.2d 129 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1977

Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 456 P.2d 604 (1969). … State, Okl.Cr., 507 P.2d 1330 (1973), and Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 518 P.2d 898 (1974), statements by an accomplice may be corroborated by circumstantial evidence. In Barrett v.

Sawyer v. State

73 Okla. Crim. 186 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1941

Nowakowski v. Lockridge, 6 Okla. Cr. 216 , 118 P. 152, 154 , 45 L.R.A., N.S., 525, Ann. … State v. Rule, 11 Okla. Cr. 237 , 144 P. 807 ; Reniff v. State, 53 Okla. Cr. 448 , 13 P. 2d 592 ; Boyer v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 220 , 97 P. 2d 779 ; L. Jones v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 244 , 101 P. 2d 860 ; Burns v.

Hilyard v. State

90 Okla. Crim. 435 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1950

This court held in the case of Brown v. State, 13 Okla. … See McCurdy v. State, 39 Okla.

Riggs v. State

373 P.2d 843 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1962

White v. State, Okl.Cr., 372 P.2d 236 ; Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 370 P.2d 41 ; Hulsey v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 332 , 169 P.2d 771 ; Epps v. State, 69 Okl.Cr. 460 , 104 P.2d 262 ; Riner v.

Surrell v. State

43 Okla. Crim. 94 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 4, 1929

Maxwell, who testified to finding the property described in the return on the premises of Surrell and Brown, the defendants; that a well-traveled path led from the house to the still; that the still was hidden in the top … In the case of Koontz v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 553 , in the body of the opinion at page 559, 139 Pac. 842, 844 (Ann.

Nelson v. State

288 P.2d 429 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1955

Scott v. … Blevins v. W. A. Graham Co., 72 Okl. 308 , 182 P. 247 .” To the same effect is Landrum v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 356 , 255 P.2d 525 ; Pierro v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 425 , 247 P.2d 291 . In Brown v. State Election.

Johns v. Hess

546 P.2d 652 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1976

See, 20 O.S.1971, §§ 40 and 41; Hurst v. Pitman, 90 Okl.Cr. 329 , 213 P.2d 877 ; Ex parte McCollum, 90 Okl.Cr. 153 , 212 P.2d 161 . … An order directed to a State Board or an officer is the exercise of original jurisdiction. State v. Cole, 4 Okl.Cr. 25, 109 P. 736 .

Tilford v. State

39 O.B.A.J. 379 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1968

Buie v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 368 P.2d 663 . *267 , In Denney v. … In the case of Cherry v.

King v. State

518 P.2d 889 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1974

The State argues that non-age is an affirmative defense which must be proven by the defendant at trial, citing numerous Oklahoma cases including the following: Penn v. State, 13 Okl.Cr. 367 , 164 P. 992 ; Williams v. … State, 17 Okl.Cr. 452 , 190 P. 892 ; Brasel v. State, 48 Okl.Cr. 403 , 291 P. 807 ; McComas v. State, 75 Okl.Cr. 321 , 131 P.2d 488 ; and Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 435 P.2d 173 .

Meehan v. State

56 Okla. Crim. 198 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1934

half-gallon jar containing some kind of a fluid; one of the officers got out of the car with a drawn pistol and approached the defendants, and they claim the car which the defendants were in was then searched, and on the running board … It is urged by the defendants that the testimony introduced by the state was secured by an illegal search and seizure, and therefore not admissible, citing Hamner v. State, 44 Okla. Cr. 209 , 280 Pac. 475 ; Welch v.