Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

3,434 results

1.76s

  • Scott v. State

    349 P.2d 47 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1960

    In the case of Gaines v. … James v. State, 1938, 64 Okl.Cr. 174 , 78 P.2d 708 ; Wheatley v. State, 77 Okl.Cr. 122 , 139 P.2d 809 ; Chambless v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 423 , 214 P.2d 947 ; Strickland v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lambert v. State

    353 P.2d 150 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1960

    His testimony, as the same appears in this record, constituted prima facie proof (Reed v. … Strickland v. State, 46 Okl.Cr. 437 , 287 P. 822 ; Holland v. State, Okl.Cr., 274 P.2d 792 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Best v. State

    391 P.2d 822 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1964

    Tartar v. Burford, 93 Okl.Cr. 281 , 227 P.2d 422 ; In re Application of Brown, Okl.Cr., 297 P.2d 575 . The petition is not verified. … It has many times been held by this Court that a writ of habeas corpus will not be issued upon an unverified petition. 12 O.S.A.1961 § 1332; Horton v. Waters, 95 Okl.Cr. 112 , 240 P.2d 1129 ; Arles v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dimsdle v. State

    456 P.2d 621 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1969

    Though this Court frowns upon any delay in taking defendant before a magistrate, we are committed to the rule as related in Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 384 P.2d 54 . … Also see, Fry v. State, 78 Okl.Cr. 299 , 147 P.2d 803 ; Hendrickson v. State, 93 Okl.Cr. 379 , 229 P.2d 196 ; and, Pickens v. State, Okl.Cr., 450 P.2d 837 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Camp v. State

    70 Okla. Crim. 68 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1940

    It is stated in Hargus v. State, 58 Okla. … Pickett v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 60 , 248 P. 352 ; Clemmer v. State, 56 Okla. Cr. 354 , 40 P. 2d 37 ; Goodnight v. State, 62 Okla.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Sheller v. State

    58 Okla. Crim. 204 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1935

    Wines v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 150 , 121 Pac. 168 ; Robbins v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 291 , 155 Pac. 191 ; Browning v. State [ 31 Okla. Cr. 373 , 239 Pac. 272 ], supra; Stamper v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 321 , 220 Pac. 67 . … See, also, Quinton v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 520 , 139 Pac. 705 ; Robbins v. State, supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. State

    90 Okla. Crim. 137 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1949

    See, also, Brown v. State, 89 Okla. Cr. 389 , 208 P. 2d 1143 , announcing the same rule. … Cruse v. State, 86 Okla.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cleary v. State

    491 P.2d 782 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1971

    See Stone v. State, Okl.Cr., 442 P.2d 519 . … Tilford v. State, Okl.Cr., 437 P.2d 261 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Poindexter v. State

    585 P.2d 360 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1978

    See Brooks v. State, Okl.Cr., 484 P.2d 1333 (1971). Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 494 P.2d 344 (1972) and Knight v. State, Okl.Cr., 506 P.2d 927 (1973). … See Carson v. State, Okl.Cr., 493 P.2d 1397 (1972). The Order Revoking defendant’s Suspended Sentence is AFFIRMED. CORNISH and BRETT, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Childress v. State

    572 P.2d 989 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1977

    In Cheeves v. … Furthermore, we stated in Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 404 P.2d 78, 80 (1965), that: *991 “ . . .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. State

    62 O.B.A.J. 2238 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1991

    Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). We addressed this double jeopardy in Carter v. State, 764 P.2d 206 (Okl.Cr.1988). … See Enriquez v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. State

    3 Okla. Crim. 618 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1909

    if, in their judgment, said board finds that the public interest requires the appointment of such clerk. … Bailey v. United Stastes, ante, p. 175, 104 Pac. 917 . In the case at bar, however, we find there has been no neglect or omission on the part of the trial court, and that the appeal has been properly perfected.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. State

    448 P.2d 295 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1968

    This Court has repeatedly held as it did in Farris v. … Also see Williams v. State, Okl.Cr., 392 P.2d 65 (1964); Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 423 P.2d 743 (1967).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Glidewell v. State

    663 P.2d 738 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 4, 1983

    See, Shorney v. State, 524 P.2d 69 (Okl.Cr.1974); compare, Kelly v. State, 607 P.2d 706 (Okl.Cr.1980). This assignment is without merit. V. … See, Bufford v. State, 382 So.2d 1162 (Ala.Cr. App.1980); and State v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Vaughn v. State

    538 P.2d 1124 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1975

    Defendant contends that the following rule promulgated by the Oklahoma Board of Chemical Tests for Alcoholic Influence was not followed in the instant case, citing Westerman v. … In the case of Samples v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. State

    288 P.2d 429 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1955

    Scott v. … Blevins v. W. A. Graham Co., 72 Okl. 308 , 182 P. 247 .” To the same effect is Landrum v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 356 , 255 P.2d 525 ; Pierro v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 425 , 247 P.2d 291 . In Brown v. State Election.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Reily

    60 Okla. Crim. 217 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1936

    Cas. 1916A, 719; Pryor v. State, 48 Okla. Cr. 91 , 290 Pac. 345 . The denial of this right goes to the jurisdiction to assess punishment. … Ex parte Sullivan, supra; Ex parte Brown, 43 Okla. Cr. 339 , 278 Pac. 671 . There is a further reason why petitioner should be discharged.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. State

    483 P.2d 737 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1971

    Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 481 P.2d 475 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State

    47 Okla. Crim. 184 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1930

    Rea, County Clerk, v. State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners, Lincoln County, 29 Okla. 708 , 119 Pac. 235 ; State ex rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, 22 Okla. 712 , 98 Pac. 964 ; Dunlap v. … Board County Commissioners, Carter County, 85 Okla. 295 , 205 Pac. 1109 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Gillespie v. State

    355 P.2d 451 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1960

    And in O’Toole v. … Also see People v. Donovan, 376 Ill. 602 , 35 N.E.2d 54 ; State of Idaho v. Mitchell, 77 Idaho 115 , 289 P.2d 315 . In the case of State v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Hill v. State, 1972 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 601 (1972)Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.