Case law

National American Ins. Co. v. OKEMAH MANAGEMENT CO., LLC

189 P.3d 1223 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 2008

Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp., 2007 OK 38, 111 , 160 P.3d 959, 963 . … Haworth v. Jantzen, 2006 OK 35, 113 , 172 P.3d 193, 196 . And issues of law, of course, are reviewed de novo. Kluver *1224 v. Weatherford Hosp. Authority, 1993 OK 85 , 1 14, 859 P.2d 1081, 1084 . 2 .

Robertson v. City of Jones

63 O.B.A.J. 2164 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 24, 1991

In Robinson v. … City of Bartlesville Board of Education, 700 P.2d 1013 (Okla.1985), the Court described the difference between a discretionary act and an act which once begun is required to be maintained to avoid liability by the political

OKLA. QUARTER HORSE RACING ASSOC. v. OKLA. HORSE RACING COMMISSION

2020 OK CIV APP 32 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 2020

BOARD OF OKLAHOMA POLYGRAPH EXAMINERS Discussed at Length Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 1992 OK 63 , 841 P.2d 573 , 63 OBJ 1359, Prettyman v. Halliburton Co. … Public Employees Relations Board Discussed at Length 1998 OK 113 , 980 P.2d 109 , 69 OBJ 4068, Polymer Fabricating, Inc. v. Employers Workers' Compensation Association Discussed Title 75.

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DAVIS

2022 OK CIV APP 30 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 2022

Brown v. Alliance Real Estate Group , , ¶7, . We review the evidence de novo , in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment. Vance v. Federal Natl. Mortg. … See Murg v. Barnsdall Nursing Home , , ¶20, . Such a person is classified as an "interested party." Id. ; .

Tulsa Order of Police Lodge No. 93 v. City of Tulsa

73 O.B.A.J. 195 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 2001

Neil Acquisition v. Wingrod Inv. … See also City of Muskogee v.

Scott-Kinnear, Inc. v. Eberly & Meade, Inc.

65 O.B.A.J. 2732 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1994

Bettis v. Brown, 819 P.2d 1381, 1382 (Okl.App.1991). The parties, co-tenants in oil and gas leases, were involved in a different lawsuit (the Apache) where Appellees were the Plaintiffs and Appellant was Defendant. … FDIC v. Sumner, 820 P.2d 1357, 1359 (Okl.App.1991) (cert. den.), citing White v. Wensauer, 702 P.2d 15, 18 (Okl.1985). The lis pendens continues through the time in which an action for review may be taken. Hart v.

WHITEHEAD v. CORNERSTONE RX, LLC and HUENERGARDT

2026 OK CIV APP 16 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 7, 2026

Board of County Comm'rs v. Assoc. of County Commissioners of Okla. Self-Insured Group , 2021 OK 15, ¶ 9 , 485 P.3d 234 . … See also Board of Cnty.

Smith v. Teel

175 P.3d 960 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 2007

Brown v. Alliance Real Estate Group, 1999 OK 7 , 976 P.2d 1043, 1045 . Summary judgment is not proper where reasonable minds could draw different inferences or conclusions from the undisputed facts. Id. … Brown v. Oklahoma State Bank & Trust Co. of Vinita, 1993 OK 117 , 860 P.2d 230 . 6 .

Beers v. Hillory

241 P.3d 285 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 2010

Brown v. Patel, 2007 OK 16, ¶ 11 , 157 P.3d 117, 122 (footnotes omitted). … Brown v. Patel, 2007 OK 16, ¶ 9 , 157 P.3d 117 (citing Christian v. American Home Assurance Co., 1977 OK 141 , 577 P.2d 899 ).

Crisis Pregnancy Outreach, Inc. v. Gottfried

191 P.3d 633 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 2008

Tulsa County Budget Board v. Tulsa County Excise Board, 2003 OK 103 , 81 P.3d 662 . … Anschutz Corporation v.

WHITE v. 918 CONSTRUCTION

524 P.3d 502 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 2022

Brown v. Claims Mgmt. Res. Inc. , 2017 OK 13 85A O.S. §1 et seq . Title 85A O.S. Supp. 2019 §78 1. In violation of constitutional provisions; 2. In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the Commission; 3. … Kohler v. Chambers , 2019 OK 2 435 P.3d 109 ¶6 In McClish v. Woodarts Inc. , 2014 OK CIV APP 41 324 P.3d 409 Id. at ¶17, quoting Key Energy Servs., Inc. v.

Griffith Realty Co. v. City of Oklahoma City

744 P.2d 227 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1987

See, e.g., Garrett v. City of Oklahoma City, 594 P.2d 764 (Okl.1979); City of the Village v. McCown, 446 P.2d 380 (Okl.1968); Preston v. City of Stillwater, 428 P.2d 215 (Okl.1967); City of Tulsa v. … Nichols, 385 P.2d 816 (Okl.1963); Oklahoma City v. Barclay, 359 P.2d 237 (Okl. 1961); City of Tulsa v. Swanson, supra; City of Tulsa v. Mobley, supra.

AUTUMN WOOD FARMS, LLC v. BYNUM

361 P.3d 540 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 2015

Johnson v. … Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶ 8 ; 85 P.3d 841, 845 (citations omitted). 2 . '"Appreciable" is defined as "capable of being perceived or measured." Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary 92 (1986).

Smoot v. B & J Restoration Services, Inc.

279 P.3d 805 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 16, 2012

Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7 , 1 17, 85 P.3d 841, 847 (allegation that shareholders operated corporation to defeat public policy of protecting nursing home resident from injury sufficient to state a claim for relief). … Tate v. Browning-Ferris Inc., 1992 OK 72 , n. 12, 833 P.2d 1218 .

Bradshaw v. Bradshaw

578 P.2d 762 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1978

Co. v. Brown, Okl., 519 P.2d 491 (1974). … Key v. Key, Okl., 388 P.2d 505 (1964); Brasier v. Brasier, 200 Okl. 689 , 200 P.2d 427 (1948); Burton v. Burton, 176 Okl. 494 , 56 P.2d 385 (1936); Mann v. Mann, 135 Okl. 211 , 275 P. 348 (1929); Wooden v.

Skinner v. Gilcrease Hills Development Corp.

548 P.2d 679 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1976

The court cited the Todd holding with approval in City of Yale v. Noble, supra, and in Penix v. City of Stillwater, supra. Later, the Todd principle was restated in Oklahoma City v. … Siegenthaler v. Newton, 174 Okl. 216 , SO P.2d 192 (1935); Barnes v. Clark, Okl., 364 P.2d 693 (1961).

State v. Boylan

362 P.3d 1153 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 2015

Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶ 18 , 85 P.3d 841, 845 (citation omitted). … (quoting Barks v. Young, 1977 OK 81, ¶ 7 , 564 P.2d 228, 229 ). «18 Section 7508-2.3 sets forth numerous requirements that must be included in a permanent relinquishment. Its provisions are 'mandatory. Fuller v.

Ledford v. Wheeler

620 P.2d 903 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1980

In Russell v. … Public Service Co. of Okla. v. Home Builders Ass’n of Realtors, Inc., Okl., 554 P.2d 1181 (1976); Brown v. Lambdin, Okl., 531 P.2d 1386 (1974); and Boughan v. Herington, Okl., 472 P.2d 434 (1970).

Springer v. Richardson Law Firm

239 P.3d 473 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 2010

Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶4 , 85 P.3d 841, 844 . When reviewing a motion to dismiss, we must take as true all of the pleading's allegations together with all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from them. Id. … Co. v.

State Ex Rel. MacY v. One (1) Pioneer CD-ROM Changer, Mdl. DRM-600-A, Ser. ML8515021

66 O.B.A.J. 884 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1994

In Moore v. … Roney v. State, 819 P.2d 286 (Okla.Cr.1991). After Horton v.