Case law

Morgan v. Southland Associates

65 O.B.A.J. 3395 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1994

Bettis v. Brown, 819 P.2d 1381 (Okla.App.1991). In Taylor v. … Lay v. Dworman, 732 P.2d 455 (Okla.1986). Herein, Plaintiffs pleaded Defendant’s knowledge of possible harm to them from third parties, thus giving rise to a duty on Defendant’s part.

MANN v. STATE

507 P.3d 1273 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 2022

MANN v. … Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841 ¶8 A deferred sentence in Oklahoma does not end criminal proceedings.

CH Well Servicing, Inc. v. State Insurance Fund

69 O.B.A.J. 521 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1997

Brown & Sons v. Savage, 1953 OK -, 208 Okla. 668 , 258 P.2d 183 , Savage was employed in the company’s feed and grain business in Enid. The company had a second business, oil and gasoline sales, in Oklahoma City. … Brown & Sons, 258 P.2d at 186 . If the Fund accepts premiums, it cannot deny coverage. Alliance Temporary Services, Inc. v. McGehee, 1991 OK CIV APP 129 , 822 P.2d 692 . ¶ 6 Company’s citation to Traveler’s Ins. Co. v.

Pendley v. Pottawatomie County Assessor

126 P.3d 675 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 19, 2005

Johnson v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety, 2000 OK 7, ¶ 14 , 2 P.3d 334, 338 , citing Stonecipher v. Dist. … A particular plaintiff was permitted to maintain an action for mandamus in Adair County Excise Board v.

Dominiak v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

68 O.B.A.J. 836 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1997

In Wren v. … In Smith v. State ex rel.

Anderson v. Oklahoma Temporary Services, Inc.

67 O.B.A.J. 2973 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1996

Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74, 77 (Okla.1986). … Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74, 76 (Okla.1986). 2 . Appellee filed a motion to strike portions of the record.

McCRABB v. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

216 P.3d 312 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 27, 2009

Perry v. Green, 1970 OK 70 , 468 P.2d 483 . An order granting summary relief disposes of legal issues. Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32 , 935 P.2d 319 . … Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 989 P.2d 448 .

In Re Adoption of L.J.S.

216 P.3d 300 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 2009

Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp., 2007 OK 38, ¶ 11 , 160 P.3d 959, 963-964 . (Emphasis original.) (Citations omitted.) … Scott v. Scott, 2001 OK 9 , 19 P.3d 273 . ¶ 15 Reading the provisions of § 5 together, the legislature’s intent is reasonably certain.

Clark v. Miller

631 P.2d 1343 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1981

Shea, 537 P.2d 417 (1975), while "shall" is usually "given its common meaning of 'must' ... implying a command or mandate," Sneed v. Sneed, 585 P.2d 1363 (1978). See also, Oldham v. … Drummond, Board of Education of Independent School Dist. No. 1-85, 542 P.2d 1309 (1975); Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 (1973).

Vincent v. Tri-State Insurance Co.

65 O.B.A.J. 1659 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1994

Brown v. United Services Automobile Association, 684 P.2d 1195 (Okla.1984). … High v. Southwestern Insurance Company, 520 P.2d 662 (Okla.1974). Here Plaintiffs identified the tort-feasor, filed a lawsuit and obtained a settlement of their damages. They were not left stranded.

In Re MB

956 P.2d 171 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1998

Thrash v. Thrash, 1991 OK 32, ¶ 12 , 809 P.2d 665, 668 ; Brown v. … Dodds v.

Williams v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.

67 O.B.A.J. 1996 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1995

Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 679 P.2d 1296 (Okla.1984). … See Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University, 489 U.S. 468 , 109 S.Ct. 1248 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989).

George v. Town of Bearden

700 P.2d 1030 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1985

Fisk Discount Corp. v. Brooklyn Taxicab Trans. Co., 270 A.D. 491 , 60 N.Y.S.2d 453 (1946). … City of Bethany v. District Court, 200 Okla. 49 , 191 P.2d 187 (1948). The Supreme Court of Oklahoma has characterized the conditions precedent to exercise of annexation power as “jurisdictional facts.” Jones v.

Liberty Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City, N.A. v. Perimeter Center Ltd. Partnership

69 O.B.A.J. 1592 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1998

Sooner appealed this interpretation to the Oklahoma City Board of Adjustment (“Board”), and August 1, 1996, the Board upheld City staffs interpretation. … See, 11 O.S.1991 § 44-110; Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State, 75 Okla. 42 , 181 P. 487 (1919).

CORBETT v. COFFMAN

329 P.3d 764 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 9, 2014

Jackson v. … The court then quoted the second syllabus of Salyer v.

Smith v. American Flyers, Inc.

540 P.2d 1212 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1975

Runyon v. Reid, Okl., 510 P.2d 943 . … Adams v. U. S., D.C.Okl., 239 F.Supp. 503 . We do not believe the regulations of the State Board of Health were designed to make him one.

TUCKER v. STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY

2014 OK CIV APP 45 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 2013

Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund , 2001 OK 71, ¶13 , 33 P.3d 302, 307 ; City of Tulsa v. Public Employees Relations Board , 1998 OK 92, ¶14 , 967 P.2d 1214, 1220 . … MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND Discussed 1998 OK 92 , 967 P.2d 1214 , 69 OBJ 3242, City of Tulsa v. State ex rel. Public Employees Relations Board Discussed Title 47.

HOME FIRST v. MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY CO.

510 P.3d 1289 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 2020

HOME FIRST v. … Gunn, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendant/Appellant, Blake Sonne, SONNE LAW FIRM, PLC, Norman, Oklahoma, and Tony Gould, George Brown, BROWN & GOULD, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Barbara G.

Beebe v. Duncan School District No.I-01

70 O.B.A.J. 2239 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1999

Reherman v. … such board shall be final.

Eaves v. Eaves

71 O.B.A.J. 2103 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 2000

Brown v. Founders Bank and Trust Co., 1994 OK 130 , 890 P.2d 855, n. 9 . The purpose of such policy is to afford parties every opportunity to have a hearing on the merits of their claims. … Under Section 2012(G), the trial court is obligated to permit an amendment if the defect may be remedied. 12 O.S.1991, § 2012(G); Brown v. Founders Bank and Trust Co., 1994 OK 130 , 890 P.2d 855 ; Kelly v.