Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklacivapp

1,936 results

0.53s

  • Ator v. UNKNOWN HEIRS AND ASSIGNS OF ATOR

    146 P.3d 821 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 2006

    Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22 , 989 P.2d 448, 455 . Our de novo review is plenary, independent, and non-deferential. See Gladstone v. Bartlesville Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 30, 2008 OK 80, 15 , 66 P.3d 442, 445 . … No. 8C, Dunklin County, 328 S.W.2d 646, 651 (Mo.1959) and Board v. Nevada Sch. Dist., 868 Mo. 828 , 251 S.W.2d 20, 26 (1952) involved land conveyed by determinable fee for use as school sites.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robison v. Maynard

    64 O.B.A.J. 2515 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1992

    TO THE BOARD OF MEDI-COLEGAL INVESTIGATIONS; ... … Furthermore, the court in Allen v. Board of Trustees of Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices and Judges, 769 P.2d 1302, 1305 (Okla.1988), stated: Under the constitutional mandate of Art. 5, § 43, Okl.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • FREJO v. STATE ex rel. DEPT. of PUBLIC SAFETY

    2019 OK CIV APP 63 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 2019

    FREJO v. STATE ex rel. … of Tests for Alcohol and Drug Influence (Board or the Board) rules.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • NIEMI v. CITY OF TULSA

    2016 OK CIV APP 17 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 2016

    Stump v. … Discussed 2007 OK 38, 160 P.3d 959, LOWERY v. ECHOSTAR SATELLITE CORP. Discussed 2007 OK 97, 179 P.3d 606, STUMP v. CHEEK Discussed 2009 OK 90, 227 P.3d 133, STATE ex rel. BOARD OF REGENTS v. McCLOSKEY BROTHERS, INC.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Isle v. Brady

    288 P.3d 259 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 2012

    Gail Brown that were block billed and reduced those charges by the amount of $2,280. … Burk v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hinton v. Labor Source

    69 O.B.A.J. 287 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1997

    See, Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Koval), 109 Pa.Commw. 565, 531 A.2d 826 (1987), overruled on procedural grounds by FMC Corp, v. W.C.A.B. … (Wadatz), 116 Pa.Commw. 527, 542 A.2d 616 (1988); Lukens, Inc., v. Workmen’s Compensation Board (Williams), 130 Pa.Commw. 479, 568 A.2d 981 (1990); Georgia Pacific Corporation v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Mustain v. State ex rel. Dept. of Public Safety

    138 P.3d 565 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 2006

    Polk v. State ex rel. Dept. of Pub. Safety, 1996 OK CIV APP 100, ¶ 4 , 927 P.2d 55, 56 . Accord Smith v. State ex rel. Dept. of Pub. … See also Stonecipher v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McEvers v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Appointing Authority

    615 P.2d 307 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1980

    V E of the Employee Handbook. 10 Was the finding of the Board clearly erroneous in view of the evidence? … IV McEvers places considerable emphasis on the holding in Corporation Comm’n v. Oklahoma State Personnel Bd., 513 P.2d 116 (Okl.1973). Its inapplicability, however, is apparent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ONDOBO v. INTEGRIS BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER

    2024 OK CIV APP 5 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 2, 2023

    Jackson is a physician practicing Obstetrics and Gynecology in Oklahoma City who holds an active board certification with the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology. … REESE Cited 2010 OK 5 , 237 P.3d 134 , ESTATE OF CROWELL v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Discussed 2011 OK 51 , 261 P.3d 1129 , SMITH v. HINES Discussed 2011 OK 82 , 267 P.3d 106 , DEPT. OF SECURITIES ex rel. FAUGHT v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pierce v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

    64 O.B.A.J. 2503 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1993

    It is also uncontested that the Board’s regulations provide that such results be reduced to two digits to the right of the decimal point. … See State v. Acosta, 112 Or.App. 191 , 827 P.2d 1368 (1992). AFFIRMED. BOUDREAU, P.J., and STUBBLEFIELD, J., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Bridgestone-Firestone, Inc.

    66 O.B.A.J. 3201 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1995

    As the court explained in Tice v. … Brown said “that was not, in fact, done” and that after Evans left, “Jeff told the technician working on the car to wash the engine and paint it ... and install it in her car.” In Blackburn v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McAlary v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human Services

    233 P.3d 399 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 2009

    Id.; Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine v. Mohr, 1971 OK 64 , 485 P.2d 235 . *404 T 10 We must accord great weight to the expertise of an administrative agency. City of Hugo v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. … City of Hugo v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Public Employees Relations Board, 1994 OK 134 , 886 P.2d 485 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wilkerson v. City of Pauls Valley

    72 O.B.A.J. 1878 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 2001

    See Ricks Exploration v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 1984 OK 73, ¶ 12 , 695 P.2d 498, 504 ; Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Okla. M.C. … Board of County Commissioners of Comverse Co., 924 P.2d 91 (Wyo.1996). Zoning is concerned with the use of the property and zoning laws control the immediate use of the property. Chili Cooperative Ass'n v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Eapen v. McMillan

    196 P.3d 995 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 2008

    Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7 , 85 P.3d 841, 844 . … Fanning v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Macy v. Items & Money Seized from Flamingo Bingo

    738 P.2d 1384 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1987

    As stated in Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County v. … The court entered a finding that bingo cards are not punch boards as defined by § 966 and granted Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss. The State appeals.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Trice v. Burress

    137 P.3d 1253 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 2006

    See, Hadnot v. Show, 1992 OK 21, ¶ 26 , 826 P.2d 978 , 987 1 ; Guinn v. … The balance we strike favors the religious organization since we recognize that a qualified privilege exists which protects the actions of the Board and the statements made by the Board members during the December 10, 1976

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. State ex rel. Crawford

    69 O.B.A.J. 2530 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1998

    City of Bixby v. State ex rel. Dept. of Labor, 1996 OK CIV APP-, 934 P.2d 364 (cert. denied). … Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • JONES v. CABLER

    529 P.3d 920 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 2022

    JONES v. … Brown v. Claims Mgmt. Resources, Inc. , 2017 OK 13 391 P.3d 111 Id. Likewise, questions of statutory construction are subject to de novo review. Humphries v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Wallace's Fourth Southmoor Addition

    874 P.2d 818 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1994

    PROPPS, INC., Appellant, v. Dorothy J. ROGERS, Trustee of the R.L. Rogers Childrens Trust, and Bessie L. Rogers and Robert L. Rogers, Co-Trustees of the Bessie L. Rogers Revocable Trust Dated June 12, 1992; Luran V. … Jackson v. Williams, 714 P.2d 1017, 1021 (Okl. 1985); Pirtle v. Wade, 593 P.2d 1098, 1100 (Okl.App. 1979) (Cert. denied 1979).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 2359 v. City of Edmond

    619 P.2d 1274 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1980

    Jennings v. St. Elizabeth Hospital, 54 A.D.2d 607 , 387 N.Y.S.2d 327 (Sup.Ct.App.Div.1977) and Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Williamsport Area School District, 370 A.2d 1241 (Pa. … Comm.Ct.1977) rev’d on other grounds Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Williamsport Area School District, 406 A.2d 329 (Pa.1979).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.