Case law

Smith v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

62 O.B.A.J. 481 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1990

In Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security Commission, 697 P.2d 533 (Okl.1985), the Court adopted the definition of “misconduct” in Tynes v. … See also Arkle v. Independent School Dist.

Taylor v. Payne

65 O.B.A.J. 1370 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1994

Trett v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co., 775 P.2d 275 (Okla.1989). … See Wooten v. Hall, 442 P.2d 334 (Okla.1968).

Overholt v. Independent School District No. 2, Tulsa County

64 O.B.A.J. 1771 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1993

In Matthewson v. … In Maloy v.

State ex rel. Pate v. Independent School District No. 67

789 P.2d 251 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1989

There was no conflict of interest between Members, Board and Pebsworth, as all were aligned together in opposition to Appellant’s claim. Cf. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. … See, e.g., McKee v. Producers and Refiners Corp., 170 Okl. 559 , 41 P.2d 466 (1946) (fact that parties were not in antagonistic position in former lawsuit does not rob prior judgment of its validity.)

Oklahoma City Public Schools, Own Risk v. Strunk

63 O.B.A.J. 304 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1991

Long v. … Hermetics Switch, Inc. v. Sales, 640 P.2d 963 (Okla.1982).

Chastain v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

51 P.3d 591 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 31, 2002

Bruner v. Sobel, 1998 OK 60, ¶ 9 , 961 P.2d 815, 817 . … State v.

Tsotaddle v. Absentee Shawnee Housing Authority

72 O.B.A.J. 890 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 8, 2000

In Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), the Supreme Court explained that a public employee may acquire a constitutionally protected property right in continued employment. … Joffe, 1993 OK CIV APP 169, ¶ 24 , 873 P.2d at 306 (quoting Brown v. Skaggs-Albertson's Properties, Inc., 563 F.2d 983, 988 (10th Cir.1977), quoting Park v.

Andrews v. Independent School District No. 57

71 O.B.A.J. 2694 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 2000

Vaughn v. Board of Bar Examiners for the Oklahoma Bar Association, 1988 OK 87 , 759 P.2d 1026, 1030 , citing Board of Education of City of Los Amgeles v. … Kelley v. City of Tulsa, 1977 OK 160 , 569 P.2d 455, 457 .

Glenn v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

782 P.2d 150 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1989

Vester v. Board of Review, 697 P.2d 533, 536 (Okla.1985). The reviewing court looks to the entire record, including evidence opposed to the finding, in determining whether an order is supported by substantial evidence. … Banking Board v. Wilkerson, 642 P.2d 1141, 1143 (Okl.1982). Clearly the district court has the power to reverse an administrative decision which is not supported by the evidence. Vester, 697 P.2d at 538-39 .

Arkle v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. ONE

784 P.2d 91 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1989

784 P.2d 91 (1989) Donald Gene ARKLE, Appellee, v. … In Tynes v. Uniroyal Tire Company, 679 P.2d 1310 (Okla.

Copeland v. Admiral Pest Control Co.

933 P.2d 937 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1996

In Abernathy v. … The duty of an innkeeper with respect to brown recluse spiders is not before us. For a general discussion of such duty, see Rodgers v. La Quinta Motor Inn, 316 Ark. 644 , 873 S.W.2d 551 (1994) and Brunelle v.

Jarboe Sales Co. v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission

74 O.B.A.J. 1010 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 2002

By constitutional amendment, in 1984, the ABLE Commission replaced the ABC Board. . Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Milam, 1964 OK 54, 393 P.2d 823 ; Wray v. … Oklahoma Beverage Control Board, 1968 OK 72 , 442 P.2d 309 ; Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Welch, 1968 OK 150 , 446 P.2d 268 ; Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, 1973 OK 45 , 509 P.2d 666 .

Moore v. Moore

74 O.B.A.J. 3342 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 2003

See Brown v. Brown, 822 So.2d 1119 (Miss.App.2002), and Clemmons v. … See Hartman v. Smith, 100 Wash.2d 766 , 674 P.2d 176 (1984); Miller v. Miller, 29 Or.App. 723 , 565 P.2d 382 (1977), Stapel v. Stapel, 4 Kan.App.2d 19 , 601 P.2d 1176 (1979); and Georgia Dept. of Human Resources ex rel.

BRISCO v. GERARD

530 P.3d 75 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 2022

BRISCO v. … Brown v. Patel , 2007 OK 16 157 P.3d 117 or treated him. A. Evidence Dr.

Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.

308 P.3d 175 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 23, 2013

New Orleans Employees' Retirement System, et al. v. … Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, et al. v. McClendon, et al., Case No 110,426.

Reddell v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

71 O.B.A.J. 32 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1999

Tire Co. v. … Sharp v. Tulsa County Election Board, 1994 OK 104 , 890 P.2d 836 .

Washington Ass'n of Classroom Teachers v. Independent School District No. I-05 of McClain County

64 O.B.A.J. 3298 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 10, 1993

It bargains with the Board of Education (Board) as to hours, wages, fringe benefits, and other working conditions. … See Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 (Okl.1982). Appellant’s contention, that the employees’ right to vote has been denied is not well taken.

Vince Allen & Associates, Inc. v. Delhi Gas Pipeline Corp.

788 P.2d 414 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 15, 1989

In Carlisle Trust v. … Dooley v. Cordes, 434 P.2d 289 (Okla.1967), 15 O.S.1961 § 170.

Sharp v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

877 P.2d 629 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 24, 1994

This ease is analogous to Brown v. Usry, 856 P.2d 1018 (Okla.Ct.App.1993), and the disposition reached herein is consistent with the holding of that case. … We agree with the conclusion in Brown that such towing and storage charges are “a necessary incident to ... drug enforcement” and as such are properly paid from the “revolving funds” established for enforcement of the drug

Burton v. Sertoma Handicapped Opportunity

125 P.3d 689 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 2005

. ¶ 1 Mary Burton appeals a District Court order which dismissed her appeal of a decision by the Board of Review of the OMahoma Employment Security Commission (Board) which denied her claim for unemployment compensation. … Earls, the plaintiff in OESC v. Carter, had also failed to name the Commission as a co-defendant in the petition for review.