Case law

R & R Engineering Co. v. Board of Review OESC, Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

322 P.3d 471 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 2014

Vester v. Board of Review of Okla. Employment Sec. Comm’n, 1985 OK 21, ¶ 10 , 697 P.2d 533 . … Quality v. Dep’t of Cent. Servs., 2008 OK CIV APP 30, ¶ 13 , 180 P.3d l.

WARD & LEE, P.L.C. v. CITY OF CLAREMORE

316 P.3d 225 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 31, 2013

OSCN Found Document:WARD & LEE, P.L.C. v. … OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY BOARD Discussed Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 2003 OK 65, 73 P.3d 871, CITIZENS AGAINST TAXPAYER ABUSE, INC. v.

Morgan v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

65 O.B.A.J. 3364 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1993

Lone Star Helicopters, Inc. v. … In Browning v. State ex rel. DPS, 812 P.2d 1372 (Okl.App.1991), the relevant rules and regulations were not produced at trial. .

Board of County Commissioners v. Creek County Rural Water District No. 2

66 O.B.A.J. 111 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1994

The appeal concerns questions of statutory construction of dueling legislation and a 20 year old resolution of the Creek County Board of County Commissioners. … Eason Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission, 535 P.2d 283 (Okla.1975). Consistent with our rules of statutory construction, we will not dissect each of the above enactments to determine its isolated intent.

City of Oklahoma City v. Public Employees Relations Board of the State

68 O.B.A.J. 2358 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1997

Dicks v. Clarence L. Boyd Co., 205 Okla. 383 , 238 P.2d 315, 317 (1951). … Tulsa Area Hospital Council v. Oral Roberts University, 626 P.2d 316 (Okla.1981). Our review of administrative rulings does not include weighing the evidence on appeal. See, Samson Resources Co. v.

Fairres v. State, ex rel. Department of Public Safety

65 O.B.A.J. 1366 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1994

The trial court took judicial notice of Board’s rules and regulations without objection by Fairres. 6 The trial court also had before it a copy of Board’s rules and regulations in controversy. See, Browning v. … We find the report of maintenance results using % w/v is in substantial compliance with *946 Board’s rules and regulations.

Haddan v. The Coves Master Association, Inc.

2025 OK CIV APP 12 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2025

Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. Fleming Co. , 1999 OK 3 975 P.2d 907 Michelson v. Duncan , 407 A.2d 211, 218-20 (Del. 1979)). See also Johnson v. Brown , 2024 OK CIV APP 18 Hernandez v. … FOOTNOTES See 18 O.S.2021 § 1004.1 Johnson v. Brown, 2024 OK CIV APP 18 554 P.3d 781 McKee v. Rodgers , 156 A. 191, 193 (Del. Ch. 1931).

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Pioneer Area Vocational-Technical School, Vo-Tech District No. 13

64 O.B.A.J. 1603 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1993

It cites Torres v. … Conner v.

Strong v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.

66 O.B.A.J. 2577 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1995

In Brown v. Tallahassee Democrat, Inc., 440 So.2d 588 (Fla.App.1983), the court reversed dismissal of the plaintiffs action for defamation. … Monitor Patriot Co. v.

Kating v. City of Pryor Ex Rel. Municipal Utility Board of Pryor

70 O.B.A.J. 1271 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1998

Partnership v. … Kating v.

Cust-O-Fab v. Bohon

65 O.B.A.J. 2171 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1994

Boveri v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Burkett, 755 P.2d 650, 651 (Okl.1988); Beall v. Altus Public School District, 632 P.2d 400, 401 (Okl.1981).

State ex rel. Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision v. Litchfield

76 O.B.A.J. 51 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 2004

what misconduct is sufficient to trigger a proceeding resulting in sanctions. 137 The Board, citing Bottles v. … Perez v.

Nida v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System Board of Trustees

75 O.B.A.J. 3058 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 2004

Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7 , 85 P.3d 841 . 114 The determination of Legislative intent controls statutory construction. Independent Finance Institute v. Clark, 1999 OK 43 , 990 P.2d 845 . … See also, Hopkins v.

Pruitt v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission, Board of Review

918 P.2d 80 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1996

It is well settled that judicial review of a decision of the Board of Review is a “special proceeding,” not a civil action. Edmondson v. Siegfried Ins. Agency, Inc., 577 P.2d 72 (Okla.1978). … General provisions of civil procedure do not apply to the special proceeding for district court review of decisions by the Board of Review. See District Ct. for Seventeenth Jud. Dist. v.

International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 2284 v. Public Employees Relations Board

358 P.3d 941 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 2015

See City of Tulsa v. State ex rel. Pub. Em *944 ployees Relations Bd., 1998 OK 92 , 1 12, 967 P.2d 1214 . … See Traders Compress Co. v. Bd. of Review, Okla. Employment Sec.

Independent School District No. 4 v. Energy Conservation Engineering, Inc.

745 P.2d 1200 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 19, 1987

of such information prepared for and submitted to the Rogers County Excise Board September 28, 1984. … Brown’s testimony — as distinguished from the documents— was admissible. We hold it was. The complained of testimony of Mr. Brown was not hearsay.

Nordam v. Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

63 O.B.A.J. 719 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1992

The sole issue presented is whether an order of the Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission remanding a claim to the Commission’s Appeal Tribunal for further evidence is a final order subject to judicial … Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 695 P.2d 498, 501-02 (Okla.1984).

Inverness Village v. Enlow

328 P.3d 1248 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 2014

Brown v. Patel, 2007 OK 16, ¶ 10 , 157 P.3d 117, 121 . (Citation omitted.) As the trial court noted: . … McMullan v.

City of Guymon, Texas Cty. v. Buford

585 P.2d 395 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1978

Ionic Petroleum Company, 391 P.2d 792 , wherein the Supreme Court at p. 795 set out the following: *398 Again, in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. … See Oklahoma City v. State ex rel. Williamson, 185 Okl. 219 , 90 P.2d 1064 . It will be noted that the syllabus quoted supra from the case of Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v.

MANN v. STATE

2022 OK CIV APP 6 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 2022

Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶8 , 85 P.3d 841, 845 (internal citation omitted). ¶8 A deferred sentence in Oklahoma does not end criminal proceedings. … BROWN Discussed 2015 OK 24 , 348 P.3d 1080 , BABY F. v. OKLAHOMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Discussed 1950 OK 274 , 224 P.2d 268 , 203 Okla. 564 , TRADERS COMPRESS CO. v. BOARD OF REVIEW Discussed Title 22.